What reason did Kunal have to cross the line - Page 4

Whatever Kunal does has no explanation since he isn't shown to be someone who can be analyzed.

Originally posted by: IDO20

Both wanted to experience sex with each other why blame kunal or N both enjoyed and that is it . Is is neccwsary to find a reason for having sex though the CVs may waned to but failed

Adultery is crime .with 5 yrs prison its not consensual act without legal consequences as simple as that

Originally posted by: IDO20

Both wanted to experience sex with each other why blame kunal or N both enjoyed and that is it . Is is neccwsary to find a reason for having sex though the CVs may waned to but failed

Originally posted by: Snow_Angel

Nandini never forced kunal and here we are talking about manipulation..Nandini never even asked kunal for anything..The night that disgusting thing happened nandini never asked kunal to even follow her to her house or even calle d him for help..first she was scared to even acknowledge him and when she did she was not ready to leave him bcs She was scared Rajdeep can come anytime back no where she asked kunal to do what he initiated..next kunal was guilty and want to leave... nandini just let him go not for once she asked him to stay back..She is in troma and happy whatever little love she is getting from kunal..her expections were never so high next day in park when she felt he is guilty she did not think twice before leaving him even in future if kunal dump her which I feel he will do she will not even going to ask why..I feel No she will just walkout from his life ..Is it good ?No..is it justify her cheating? No but it defiantly show she is anything but manipulative..I really want her to see another side of kunal then only she will come out from her blind worshipping kunal mode..and about redemption..we human do mistakes sometimes big sometimes small but everyone can redeem herself or himself if they want to I feel nandini will do that too..Nandini is better off kunal and don't want her to end with him either but after all the cheating is mauli deserve kunal ? If knowing everything she still try to stay in touch with any one among kunal or nandini she will be the biggest dumb character of T.V. history..And about kunal his love and lust have no difference...

I agree with u nish and nandini stopped kunal for not sex she stopped coz she scared and why kunal do this to her i think he stopped himself but he doesnt

Originally posted by: Jiggy7

I felt she was stopping him for whatever followed.. Otherwise she could have spoken up when he came close to her.. He was leaving when she stopped him... Moreover she didn't look scared or confused during the deed.. She seemed content enough.. And was smiling later in the washroom remembering the moments.. So, to say Nandini wasn't interested in anything and was just in trauma and confused and didn't stop Kunal thatswhy would be wrong..

If she would have tried to stop him and he forced then its rape...

If she wasn't sober enough to give consent, it would have been rape..

But since she was sober enough to give her acknowledgement, it shows she was also interested and is as guilty as Kunal in whatever happened..

I no where said it's Rape or happened without consent..I only wanted to say she did not stopped him but she didn't asked for it too..Stopping some one not mean they have to later follow the what they done that night so saying she manipulating kunal is out of the question

Originally posted by: mango_pudding1

it is currently under supreme court hearing and the law may be changing on that. the reason for the PIL (public interest litigation) is not about the ethics of adultery but about privacy and autonomy (decision making)...

see recent article:

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/supreme-court-ipc-section-497-adultery-1303540-2018-08-02

https://thewire.in/law/should-adultery-be-a-crime-at-all

Originally posted by: mango_pudding1

it is currently under supreme court hearing and the law may be changing on that. the reason for the PIL (public interest litigation) is not about the ethics of adultery but about privacy and autonomy (decision making)...

see recent article:

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/supreme-court-ipc-section-497-adultery-1303540-2018-08-02

https://thewire.in/law/should-adultery-be-a-crime-at-all

The law will be changing as it will be more gender neutral, the PIL is based on a the fact that why a man is being punished when woman was involved with her consent, she should be punished too, the law doesn't see women as individuals, it sees women as a commodity of her husband, so if any change is likely that will be including punishment for women because our constitution provides equal rights for men and women, the law won't be scraped because central government is supporting the law