Trp Thursday 😱 - Page 5

Originally posted by: kiranpri

If Shagun had married Shaurya the show would not have gone off air. There would have been the situation of Shaurya having sindoor shaadi with Anokhi and social shaadi with Shagun. TRP would have set a new record, especially if Shagun had started her vampish behaviour towards Anokhi and the latter started crying buckets...

DJs purane show mein yeh kar chuke hai🤣 legal shaadi with negative lead and sindoor shaadi with FL. It still didn't yield them ratings, maybe because audience were sensible back then😛

Originally posted by: kiranpri

Then Monty comes back to jatao his haq as the husband blackmailing Anokhi about her parents and Anokhi having to go back to Monty. The Professor, Bablu, Ahir, Shaan, and Aastha makes all types of plans but Monty and Vineet always manage to thwart their plans.

Shagun comes to haq jatao with Prof and BM and alok start their plans. All are trapped in a big mansion because of pandemic so lots of kitchen politics....

🤣 thank god you guys aren't the writers 🤣

I am imagining that with all sort if Kekta ke background sounds... And my head spinning.

I want to know why are triangle shows so tasteless.Why is the woman who the ML "loves" irrespective of being married always a vamp? Why is she always shown to be either selfish or negative.Why? Is our audience not mature enough for a grey relationship? Why does the wife have to cry and then the family supports her (really?!)..why?! The moment you make the other partner a vamp/selfish/grey(or not so nice) in an affair, you whitewash your ML of the fact that he was a equal party to the relationship. And hence audiences also end up hating the female partner and the ML is shipped with the FL wife. WHY? Don't women have enough problems?

I just don't understand. Why do we even have vamps? I loved the people on this forum who all agreed that Shagun was not required! Why are educated women shown to be stupid?

Rajan Shahi knows to capture the taste of Indian audeinces because the shows have balance according to the Indian taste. But his shows, too ideal..too moralistic and create a picture of a family that does not exist. Anything outside the moralistic ideal of a perfect family/FL is deemed toxic in a very subtle way (which I wish he did not do). But yes, you have to give it to him...he knows the beat of the audience. Anupama is his better creation but not my taste as such, irrespective of that Rupali's acting...wow!

Originally posted by: shahsb_26

DJs purane show mein yeh kar chuke hai🤣 legal shaadi with negative lead and sindoor shaadi with FL. It still didn't yield them ratings, maybe because audience were sensible back then😛

Oh which show was that?

Actually i have been waiting for a mature take on a love triangle...its nt lyk ema dnt exist in reality so there's no point in saying all the serials showing it are regressive

...bt they can think of exploring the thing in a realistic way, i guess alt balaji's kehne ko humsafar hai was kind of on the same lines..didnt watch the series bt i lyked the promos

Originally posted by: roym

Actually i have been waiting for a mature take on a love triangle...its nt lyk ema dnt exist in reality so there's no point in saying all the serials showing it are regressive

...bt they can think of exploring the thing in a realistic way, i guess alt balaji's kehne ko humsafar hai was kind of on the same lines..didnt watch the series bt i lyked the promos

Exactly!

Why show women in a cycle where they are still stuck to their ex's or vice versa. It's traumatic. It's hurtful.

What will happen of we show them both move on in life with different partners who are good people? I am sure there must be one or two shows which must have done this but maybe our audience is not mature enough for this?!

Originally posted by: shahsb_26

@Bold - that's what happens in real life.. That show focused on what should be an ideal thing.

Just wished Kavya /Rakhi were not shown in grey light... They are kind of downplaying importance of educated people,in general.

Even I feel bad about showing educated women like kavya and rakhi as vamp. Even in saakk shagun who is a professor playing a vamp. Like seriously for a guy who is not interested in you, didn't support you when needed you are leaving Cambridge .... Like seriously 🤣🤣

Originally posted by: black.snowflake

Exactly!

Why show women in a cycle where they are still stuck to their ex's or vice versa. It's traumatic. It's hurtful.

What will happen of we show them both move on in life with different partners who are good people? I am sure there must be one or two shows which must have done this but maybe our audience is not mature enough for this?!

Considering the progressive content in our show I expected Shagun to move on and turn out to be a positive character but the makers and writers were stuck somewhere.

Originally posted by: shahsb_26

🤣 thank god you guys aren't the writers 🤣

I am imagining that with all sort if Kekta ke background sounds... And my head spinning.

Now imagine KV and Deba in such stories, they will look so stupid...

Originally posted by: saakkabc

Considering the progressive content in our show I expected Shagun to move on and turn out to be a positive character but the makers and writers were stuck somewhere.

Kitna samjhaya re baba ..par nahi...

Then they turned her into a comic relief with some hidden motive. (What?!)

I would have lovede if she came back...maybe something did not work out (eg parents fell ill so she had to come back and BM met her) and she was hurt emotionally or her ego was hurt so maybe she gets angry and tells anokhi everything( also to protect her because shaurya might do the same to her). That would have made sense and they could have still kept her logically positive and justified her presence as a strong logical woman.

Par nahi...women have to be vampisssshhhh