Epi discussion thread (Rerun)-1 - Page 6

Originally posted by: foreign-beauty

It's not in puranas. Just a few local myths.

There are controversies that shani dies or not. it's debated that he is put in eternal sleep or killed because he is weaking havoc on his siblings and his father

Originally posted by: sanghita0000

Well , I don't know about purans much , just know what I heard from local myths and astrologers , but as a writer , I can say that writer of the show degraded every character just to show Shani great...He could have glorified Shani by retaining the greatness of other characters too if he is a good writer...But I don't think he has that skill , so it was easy for him to destroy the characters only to show Shani as the victim and how great he was...Such a weak storytelling!

agreed, this proves his weakness in portraying shani as a character on the show, mentioning one famous quote from mahavarat ,
Parth replied to Pitamaha (bhishma) ,"you can not scare me by presenting how much more powerful my opponent is, my enemy is very strong that does not expose my weakness, rather than it proves me stronger as I have stronger enemies to conquer the world."
the key point to be noted, to prove your lead stronger, you do not essentially need to waken the opponent. The writer who can show his hero powerful against a powerful enemy is great. thus the writer of mahavarat is well known among the best epic writers in the world. The same case applies to the Achilles and Hector in Iliad.
now look at our writer, he one by one destroyed the keynote of all the characters. In fact weakening the opponents makes your lead more unstable; he missed it perhaps. I agree Indraadev is evil, selfish and cunning by nature, but he spoiled the character of Surya, Chandra, mangal, sangya, yama, shukracharya, and even rahu too. he kept tridevs worthless before what was happening.
His stupidity left the high end mythological drama into a typical kitchen politics where some people are showed always creating conspiracies and getting defeated each time. the show became very predictable for him.
At the end, he does not care criticisms and that is his fault. i fear this mentality one day may devastate mahakali as a show

Originally posted by: Kallol012

agreed, this proves his weakness in portraying shani as a character on the show, mentioning one famous quote from mahavarat ,
Parth replied to Pitamaha (bhishma) ,"you can not scare me by presenting how much more powerful my opponent is, my enemy is very strong that does not expose my weakness, rather than it proves me stronger as I have stronger enemies to conquer the world."
the key point to be noted, to prove your lead stronger, you do not essentially need to waken the opponent. The writer who can show his hero powerful against a powerful enemy is great. thus the writer of mahavarat is well known among the best epic writers in the world. The same case applies to the Achilles and Hector in Iliad.
now look at our writer, he one by one destroyed the keynote of all the characters. In fact weakening the opponents makes your lead more unstable; he missed it perhaps. I agree Indraadev is evil, selfish and cunning by nature, but he spoiled the character of Surya, Chandra, mangal, sangya, yama, shukracharya, and even rahu too. he kept tridevs worthless before what was happening.
His stupidity left the high end mythological drama into a typical kitchen politics where some people are showed always creating conspiracies and getting defeated each time. the show became very predictable for him.
At the end, he does not care criticisms and that is his fault. i fear this mentality one day may devastate mahakali as a show

Originally posted by: Kallol012

agreed, this proves his weakness in portraying shani as a character on the show, mentioning one famous quote from mahavarat ,
Parth replied to Pitamaha (bhishma) ,"you can not scare me by presenting how much more powerful my opponent is, my enemy is very strong that does not expose my weakness, rather than it proves me stronger as I have stronger enemies to conquer the world."
the key point to be noted, to prove your lead stronger, you do not essentially need to waken the opponent. The writer who can show his hero powerful against a powerful enemy is great. thus the writer of mahavarat is well known among the best epic writers in the world. The same case applies to the Achilles and Hector in Iliad.
now look at our writer, he one by one destroyed the keynote of all the characters. In fact weakening the opponents makes your lead more unstable; he missed it perhaps. I agree Indraadev is evil, selfish and cunning by nature, but he spoiled the character of Surya, Chandra, mangal, sangya, yama, shukracharya, and even rahu too. he kept tridevs worthless before what was happening.
His stupidity left the high end mythological drama into a typical kitchen politics where some people are showed always creating conspiracies and getting defeated each time. the show became very predictable for him.
At the end, he does not care criticisms and that is his fault. i fear this mentality one day may devastate mahakali as a show

Originally posted by: harshu27

Its alrdy taking a toll on mahakali d trps r d results of d stupid wrtr ka intelligence... nd nw no wondr d chnnl ppl hav targttd mahakali cz alrdy d trps r low so dey will gv similar treatmnt lik shani nd d mahakali shw will go fr abrupt end m fearing fr dt...😕we r blaming d chnnl bt 1 cnt clap wid only 1 hand u need both d hands to clap... d idiot wrtr nd his stupid ideas led to d disastr of sjani nd chnnl taking advntge to replace it wid sadak chaap adult shw...mujhe mile ye wrtr na jooton se maar maarkar bhurta na banao toh dekhlena🤢

if the channel is the one hand, then the second hand is the writers. thinks himself so great that even not sparing the mythologies to convert into conspiracy politics, and specially with such a show that is completely different from all other shows (in the sense that the concept of shani has below 1% connection with love and affairs, the show's key essence is the significance of detachment, the writer even destroyed this too at the end). The writer narrates the story in such a way that all these happens in his family, bloody *-***-*-

Originally posted by: Kallol012

if the channel is the one hand, then the second hand is the writers. thinks himself so great that even not sparing the mythologies to convert into conspiracy politics, and specially with such a show that is completely different from all other shows (in the sense that the concept of shani has below 1% connection with love and affairs, the show's key essence is the significance of detachment, the writer even destroyed this too at the end). The writer narrates the story in such a way that all these happens in his family, bloody *-***-*-

Originally posted by: harshu27

agree shani shw had a v gd concept since aftr ndtv imagine shw dt aired on shanidev we dint gt ny shws on shani xclusively so dis shw hd v gd concept and der was no need of mirch masala...keeping d dignity of other mytho chrctrs equally d shw gd hav bn aired and continued fr more time and would hav bn on top 5 bt dis wrter chose to use his stupid brain dt had kachra ideas to depict d stry and dt led to d disaster...😡hate dis wrter to d core🤢

Originally posted by: sanghita0000

Most hilarious fact shown in Shani is that the writer always showed that every trouble in shani's life starts from Suryalok and ends in Suryalok , as said by Hanuman once...🤣

Shani's journey should have been outside his home...mostly in mrityulok...Then I guess budget cost would have reduced too...But the show turned out to be ghar mein rachi politics , and Indradev was mostly shown in Suryalok rather than in his home...manipulating Suryadev and Yam against Shani as typical Saas...😆

exactly, this is called low class creativity, have a closer look at the antagonists depicted in the show, the writer applied saas bahu logic into mythological characters . Like there is always someone who constantly makes mistakes and gets rectified by some others (surydev), the family breaker who leaves his own family to destroy some others (indradev, i think each and everu conspiracy should be include indradev), one who always becomes the scapegoat (shani or yami) and who always goes against the hero even if there is reason or not (yam).
#shani had enough high weight content for highly sensible viewers but its the writers liability and cheapens that pulled the show down to a much lower class than what it deserved

perhaps it is the attitude that destroyed shani