Originally posted by: _Vrish_
I agree that Preeto was justified in confronting Rajbeer, but what she said to him was plain bakwas. Rajbeer is not the guy who tries to set up relationships w/ certain families - Preeto is!!! That's how it started - she wanted to hook Rajbeer w/ Ishu. Of course, since Dhruv wanted her, she didn't have to push this too hard.
But what Rajbeer said was quite accurate - the Dhillons are all about one thing and one thing only - marriage, even to the extent of wanting it quickly for Bani & Sonu. So they do tend to try and set up relationships, and that's exactly what Ishu & Meeta have been trying to nudge Preeto into as well. Of course, Rajbeer was too drunk to point that out.
Also, Preeto's argument that Rajbeer doesn't know how to respect his elders - not all elders deserve to be respected. When he is sober, even if he apologizes to the Dhillons, he can still make it clear that his parents are not worth respecting, and he doesn't want to hear anything about his relationship w/ them from Preeto or anyone else. Unlike others, I'm not so much in favor of a Rajbeeto jodi if it means his having to compromise w/ the abuse he suffered due to them. He should dump Preeto if that's what it takes to preserve his honor. And Preeto's other statement - that Rajbeer would have no one to care for him - was bakwas as well. Just as he saved Preeto, he saved other people as well - in the start when he was introduced, he saved a couple from a gang. So a lot of people would be happy to help him, w/o getting into bed w/ him.
Rajbeer should also read Dhruv the riot act and tell him not to drag him into the Dhillons due to his own engagement w/ Ishu.