Crisp Bytes SC - 4th June 13 - Page 5

Originally posted by: vaishali-AR

@ Arshi- They have brought in those terms from the very beginning.. Remember Ilaben telling Saras, '' patni tau sabko milti hai, lekin apna sab kuch jhonk dene wali naseeb se milti hai'' and now Gun and Kumud reiterating the same, only using the a different word.. ''samarpan'' implies total devotion, to completely offer one self.. the parallel you drew with Meera and Krishna is perfect.. that is what you would call samarpan.. where you have a single motto in life, to live and die in the service of the person you worship/love.. How she is able to stay true to her words and herself after marriage, which I am sure is going to happen, will be the real test.. I was just wondering, why samarpan is associated only with Kumud.. whereas,with Saras, the words associated are ''zimmedari'' , ''adhikaar''.. Maybe Samarth or hgg can throw some light on that..

Originally posted by: arshicritic

Vaishali I feel that adhikaar and zimmedari will in some way be what

Will make saras walk away from kumud. The way they talk things out

It wpnt be an MU it seems to be Saras walking away. So may be

Zimmedari and adhikar will be instrumental yhere.
What say smrth and hgg?

Originally posted by: vaishali-AR

Saras will walk away..i know.. the impulsive nature that prompted him to write the letter, and react out of jealousy is gonna play its part.. that time he had a chance to undo his mistake, this time it might be too late before he realizes..I have a feeling that the new character Danny , will be used by Guman to create a rift..

Originally posted by: arshicritic

Hmm now that youve reminded me didnt guman say something

About danny and saras and zimmedari? And how it will pull saras away? It was a few epis ago

Originally posted by: smrth

Vaishali and Arshi,,

I don't question validity of Saras' stand. Not a trace doubt on his sincerity and commitment, as well, spontaneity. A fuss is on a somewhat vain disregard of her side. Ok he pacifies her agitation. And perhaps it's his way to requite her 'practical' concerns with presenting more important aspect -'their wish' as against 'social obligation'. In the end, he fulfils his duty to pacify her nerves (as expected of him) gallantly. Amply warning Gumaan on the matter ( unlike that 'gold digger' taunt)...A bother is his singular stress on his principled stand ( doggedness!😆)...Why would he not see the source of her pain? He says, " do you know how hurt was I?' (and validly so), but why no acknowledgement of 'her pain'?...well Vaishali and arshi, there is some annoying reflection here, I did not want to put initially, but anyways...to alwaysr see our views prevail, a habit of winning arguments with sound logic, is a natural trait...But sometimes when we see other side gladly giving up some of valid part of her stand, accepting total viewpoint, is not very comfortable reflection on hindsight...😕...a secret guilt of assertiveness?!😲 Don't know.😕

I am not coherent perhaps, but...😕

I feel he is going to do something more for her. What, I don't know.😃

Originally posted by: happychappy

Smrth-ji, I'm not sure why this presents a problem for you, of all people?

Saras, typically, comforted Kumud by offering a practical or useful solace/solution to what he perceives as her problem, and standing up to Gumaan is one useful thing he has never done before. The complex emotional background to "her" side of the pain is likely to be out of his depth, in any case...(sorry😃) And he cleverly pointed out her own pyaar-viswaas logic was contradicted by her earlier OTT behaviour. Also he never once mentioned his pain until he saw that she was well over hers! What more can a man do??😆