Originally posted by: Rahm
Glad that I haven't angered you. I don't like hurting people and so I try to stay away from arguments.
Okay baseless rumors, Ali Merchant story holds no importance. If WE give it importance by talking about it then the journalist will see the interest and write more in order to sell his/her stories.
There's no such thing as every rumor being possible. You have to look at the source and the evidence before you make up your mind. Ali and Parul never seem like anything more in any of their interviews nor has Parul given any indication to wanting Ali so that is a baseless silly rumor that you can ignore.
But for Parul and Kinshuk, that's different. They give indication to their fans (even if it is false) so that the fans stay interested. Recently they performed at Boogie Woogie. Watch what Parul says at the end when the judges talked about Parul and Kinshuk's chemistry.. she said "jahan pyaar hota hain wahin pe jagda hota hain". Is that not an indication? What can fans take from that?
Of course work place is work place, but if I go to work and I act like I'm married to my co worker and people like my co worker and my jodi then they will talk about it. They will want to see us happy. Same thing for Parul and Kinshuk. They act like they're married everyday on our tv screen and so we just want them to be happy whether it's together or not. We just prefer it to be together.
Well ... the articles do mention a possibility. And it depends on a well seasoned mind to create those "instances" from dust and shadows ... isnt it? ... They just need to be given birth ... and someone did try to plant such a rumous... be it anyone.
Ignore I may ... but for igorance was it meant? ... I rather say "nay"...
Ragini and Ranvir is not Kinshuk and Parul. As for the fans, the indications are often from Ragini and Ranvir. As for "Jahan pyaar hota hai wahaan jhagra to hota hai..." can be an indication of BROTHERLY LOVE or FRIENDLY LOVE. But I read you clear my friend - its a stunt possibly. A feed.
They dont act like they are married .... my topic was about the PERSON Parul ... not Ragini. On TV we see a certain person named Ragini (daughter of PC Sharma) married to a certain individual named Ranvir (son of IJ Rajvansh). Its a Drama, a play, a tale of two people ... not a tale of Parul and Kinshuk.
So if in an office, a woman and a man work on a project together, where they need to display how a strategy (new) helps working women with families ... then after the presentation, the two project partners are not considered as LINKED ... are they?
Specially when Kinshuk is not single (as per a reputable portal, Indya.com ... owned by Star TV owner). Parul is single ... therefore she remains the target of masala seeking ears n' eyes.
Publicity again comes into the picture ... you have given a good point truely ...
But publicity cannot be beyond the range of ethics and ethical behavior ... it is not beyond in certain countries of the world. The right of the viewer cannot be misused or manipulated so profoundly ....
But I have not witnessed anything so explicit done by either Parul or Kinshuk (as Parul and Kinshuk) which would be too suggestive...
And with Kunshuk being into his own rel. .... either the whole scenario is really unfavorable for Parul ... or the situation is very dense in filmcity and the right of the viewer is ignored rather unethically.
People can have many wishes ... as I suggested with the PARK EXAMPLE ... wishes need to have lines aswell.
Edited by Ice-Thinker - 15 years ago