Unnecessary confusion

Personally, I have admired Sadhna's character. Not just because she has no one with her, but because the strength the woman has shown without any one supporting her.

But, today I am very dissapointed. Till she fell down, to make her sister win is ok. It is really nice to see such sacrifice and love she has for her sis. No way she can be compared with Ragini, who though is good at heart is self-centred and doesnt think beyond her. But, what I dont understand here is after falling purposely and making her sis win the competition, Sadhna can go directly and talk to Ragini to give the money to her so that she can save mamiji's life. Why does she needs to sign the divorce papers? It is height of stupidity. She doesnt need to tell Ragini that she fell on purpose so that Ragini can win. She can just tell her that she is here for the money to save her mamiji. All the misunderstandings would be very clear then. Later she can tell Alekh who bumps to her each and every moment, that she came to the competition to win the money and Vasu wanted her to sign the divorce paper for the money. By doing this Alekh will know the true colors of his mom. And still if Vasu forces her to sign the papers, she can tell her to call Alekh and ask him whether he also wants to sign the papers.

All the misunderstandings will be very clear.

Being self-less and pure is really a noble thought. I am a big fan of Sadhna no doubt about it and I am not a great fan of Ragini. Ragini can be a good wife, can be a good daughter can be a good daughter-in-law, mother, and later mother-in-law ,.......provided things work properly for her. She will not use her brain much. She will believe what she sees. But what is stopping Sadhna asking Ragini for money? It is not Rajvansh's money, it is mamiji's daughter's money and mamiji has full right on it.

Anyhow, I feel it is a very weak argument given by creatives.

They shouldnt show goodness bowing to evil all the time. They should show how goodness fight against evils.