Why a gurugraph ??!! - Page 2

Originally posted by: lalit1

its better to give all 10s then do the obvious discrimination that adesh and himesh did to debojit and ID giving 6&7 and also ujjaini being given 6 by adesh whilst being given 9 by ID

Giving 10 to all - does it serve the purpose in any case?... We may as well go back to 'bahut achha gaaya, aur koshish karo'! How woould have Musarrat or Aneek felt today, that as per the judges Mauli's performance was same as theirs!!

Originally posted by: *Jaya*

Giving 10 to all - does it serve the purpose in any case?... We may as well go back to 'bahut achha gaaya, aur koshish karo'! How woould have Musarrat or Aneek felt today, that as per the judges Mauli's performance was same as theirs!!

I 100% agree with you.. Even Aneek was not given full 10.. Himesh made others give 10 for him.. Probably as she got in Trishanku and votes became less, they wanted to do this.. who knows 😕

Why a gurugraph?

To give us viewers a "benchmark" to compare the singers. Increase interest in the show?
We had A,B,C in Lil Champs and now gurugraph in C2007.

The scores are hardly consistent. But so are judges comments sometimes (not just in SRGMP but other shows too).

Last Saturday's episode, Sumedha was much better than Mauli but she got a 29 whereas Mauli got a perfect 30? What do the scores mean? Are they giving it based on the song selection, singing/sur, expression/performance, mentors' expectations of a singer? 😕

Originally posted by: sonyaee

Why a gurugraph?

To give us viewers a "benchmark" to compare the singers. Increase interest in the show?
We had A,B,C in Lil Champs and now gurugraph in C2007.

The scores are hardly consistent. But so are judges comments sometimes (not just in SRGMP but other shows too).

Last Saturday's episode, Sumedha was much better than Mauli but she got a 29 whereas Mauli got a perfect 30? What do the scores mean? Are they giving it based on the song selection, singing/sur, expression/performance, mentors' expectations of a singer? 😕

if they are mentors expectations then mauli will definitely get 30 because nobody expects her to sing at all

I believe that the points should be given for the way how each contestant has sang his/her song and not how each contestant has sang better than other and nor it depends on whether the song is easy or difficult. If the judges feel that the singer has done justice to the song he/she is singing, then they do have the right to give full 10 points. It is the individual's performance that evening which matters as far as points are concerned.

Yeah wat's the point of it if ur not gonna be honest with ur points 😳 😳 😳

the gurugraph which is made by gurus obviously doesnt make any sense 🤢 🤢 🤢 if everyone gets 30, then i think thats an insult to the best singer.

If people like mauli are placed at par with other singers -thers has to be something wrong with the mento meter. It looked so stagemanaged- afterall I've seen people getting swayed by the gurugraph. Come on people they are supposed to be experts.

No use of the Gurugraph when Mauli gets better marks than Sumedha 🤢

Sumedha is a million times better than Mauli.

Originally posted by: *Jaya*

The whole point of introducing a gurugraph was to bring in objectivity to the comments given by the mentors!! But that is what seems to have got lost somewhere...!

Every other performance gets a 10, 10, 10 on the gurugraph... How does one differentiate a bad from a mediocre, and a mediocre from a good performance in that case.... Mauli, Raja, Aneek (and actually a few more) got a complete 30 on that meter? Do the judges want to say that they al sang equally well or bad... Aneek was good.. Raja was at best mediocre with the song and Mauli was bad! Then why a 30? And shouldnt a 30 mean that it was a flawless performance?

The mentors just seem to be competing amongst themselves as to who can give higher points for mediocre singing... Looks like they get a commission proportionate to the points given out!

totally agree....

it serves no purpose at all.