Paresh Rawal - the best guest - Page 13

Originally posted by: chatbuster

my position was ""that there was nothing great ..."???😕

here's my statement from pg 1:

"i liked the simple and humble part. but he cld have kept the honesty part out. not that he shld have been dishonest, just that he cld have chosen to look at the positives and be more encouraging...

strange actually to see that we appreciate him for the kind of honesty with others that we wld not want if we were one of the contestants..."

should i express things in hindi now? wld that be clearer?😛

as for nitpicking, yaar, sari katha khatam ho gayee and we are back to it? and we call me someone who insists on debate? u started the track abt the reviewer, didnt u? i said that their obligations are different than the CELEB judge. that's a BIG-TIME differentiation. if 2 people dont have the same obligations, dont expect them to behave the same way. i would be really SURPRISED if u still dont get it- this analogy is a terrible one for this reason alone. obligations/ incentives, these are important drivers. where is the mel when those two categories are different.

are u still saying that the analogy is a good one? if u are, i want to stop right here, take that apart and then move on. dont want the innuendos to somehow continue with nitpicking etc...

as for the transcript part, just hold off on the congratulatory messages. let's not jump. i'll get to it. let's first deal with where we are so far

SHADY, this was the to-and-fro with Punjini. padh le.

do you now amend your "set in stone" answer for 1? LOL

BTW, she could understand what question 1 was about. and you cant? ab itna la-la-land mei rahenge, and i shld deal with some folks?

Here is the recap, according to me

CB feels negative feedback is not acceptable in the public domain, and should be given in private, so as to not hurt the sensitivities of the contestants

We feel negative feedback is acceptable in the public domain - what's more important is honesty.

CB agreed that honesty is good, but Paresh should have been less blunt with his comments

So I pulled up Paresh's comments, verbatum, to stress that he was not blunt - he seemed concerned about the participants' feelings, and none of his comments were overly negative. In fact, he interspersed his comments with positive points as well - each of comments concerned the word 'accha'.

Now the ball is in CB's court. We want to see how Paresh could have been less blunt with his comments and still given his honest opinion. Please modify the comments to your liking.

There - that's a recap. Do you agree with it?

Originally posted by: shadyhtown

Here is the recap, according to me

CB feels negative feedback is not acceptable in the public domain, and should be given in private, so as to not hurt the sensitivities of the contestants

We feel negative feedback is acceptable in the public domain - what's more important is honesty.

CB agreed that honesty is good, but Paresh should have been less blunt with his comments

So I pulled up Paresh's comments, verbatum, to stress that he was not blunt - he seemed concerned about the participants' feelings, and none of his comments were overly negative. In fact, he interspersed his comments with positive points as well - each of comments concerned the word 'accha'.

Now the ball is in CB's court. We want to see how Paresh could have been less blunt with his comments and still given his honest opinion. Please modify the comments to your liking.

There - that's a recap. Do you agree with it?

you saw the exchange with punjini, didnt u? did u see a certain context i had established from the outset - pg. 1? u understand context, dont u?

when u quote someone or provide ur recap, dont mischarecterize by conveniently omitting things.

Originally posted by: chatbuster

SHADY, this was the to-and-fro with Punjini. padh le.

do you now amend your "set in stone" answer for 1? LOL

BTW, she could understand what question 1 was about. and you cant? ab itna la-la-land mei rahenge, and i shld deal with some folks?

See.. I don't know what Punjini ji's opinions are Jadoo ji's opinions are.. they don't have to exactly match my opinions

I have told you my opinions, since the comments question was mine.. and since I was the one who moved on to the bluntness issue, you only need to answer to me on that question.

Originally posted by: chatbuster

you saw the exchange with punjini, didnt u? did u see a certain context i had established from the outset - pg. 1? u understand context, dont u?

when u quote someone, dont mischarecterize by omitting things.

Did I omit something important from Paresh's comments? I'm sorry if I did. Could you tell me what it was and correct it?

Originally posted by: shadyhtown

See.. I don't know what Punjini ji's opinions are Jadoo ji's opinions are.. they don't have to exactly match my opinions

I have told you my opinions, since the comments question was mine.. and since I was the one who moved on to the bluntness issue, you only need to answer to me on that question.

when we quote someone or provide a recap/ summary, we shld not mischaracterize by conveniently omitting things. i dont know abt others but i question a lot of things abt someone when they do that.

Originally posted by: chatbuster

when we quote someone or provide a recap/ summary, we shld not mischaracterize by conveniently omitting things. i dont know abt others but i question a lot of things abt someone when they do that.

Forgive me lord if my mind has forgotten to include something..

See.. I just made 3 points.. and I will recap on those.. as for others I don't know

I said, negative feedback is acceptable and allowed, Paresh was right in being honest when he was asked for an opinion, he was not overly negative or insensitive to the contestants' feelings, and the primary purpose for pulling up Paresh's comments was so you could show me if you could make it significantly less blunter than it is, because it seemed pretty 'un-blunt' to me..

There.. that's all I have to say for recapping my opinions, my lord..

do u agree/ do not agree with the recap provided, together with the context i had established about "humble" and "simple"?

in other words, do you change/ do not change your "set in stone" answers now?

btw, do familarize yourself with posts from other folks. i am not interested in rehashing stuff tat's already been covered

Originally posted by: chatbuster

do u agree/ do not agree with the recap provided, together with the context i had established about "humble" and "simple"?

in other words, do you change/ do not change your "set in stone" answers now?

btw, do familarize yourself with posts from other folks. i am not interested in rehashing stuff tat's already been covered

i had a fairly simple recap. it took all this while to even understand that? we are talking abt being intellectually honest, but find it so hard to agree with things that are out there?

Originally posted by: chatbuster

i had a fairly simple recap. it took all this while to even understand that? we are talking abt being intellectually honest, but find it so hard to agree with things that are out there?

See.. if that recap is for this entire thread from page 1, then I cannot answer this, because I did not follow each and every post..

But I have recapped my own personal opinions from the start, as you can see..