Muhammad Rafi vs Kishore Kumar

Page

best_guy

@best_guy

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

Better voice: Both have a different voice.

More talented: Both.

More Awards: Kishore Kumar (8)

Classical trained: Muhammad Rafi

Classically singing is different. We are talking about playback singing. We don't really need classical there. Maybe Kishore Kumar sang better than Muhammad Rafi in 1970s. That's why he beat him. Overall he has more filmfare awards too.

I say Kishore Kumar is better.

Quote

Frequent Posters

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 16 years ago

lol

RAFI SAAHEB!!!! 😊

Just the way classical duzn't mean playback singing.. bam chika bam bam or gilli gilli akka doesn't mean either..

and btw who said that rafi couldn't sing filmi songs?

no classical singer can sing aaja aaja...

and the romance of rafi could never be matched by kishore..

and rafi's voice CANT be cloned.. kishores and lata's can..

and 4 of kishores filmfare awards were after rafi saahab death

rafi -6

kishore -4

Hero honda best singer of the millenium - rafi with 70% votes..

with all due respect to kishore da...

rafi was the best.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

333887

Suspended

Posted: 16 years ago

I don't know much about Mr. Rafi but Mr. Kishore Kumar, I have heard about him a lot in the television....so, i guess Mr. Kumar is more popular than Mr. Rafi........

Quote

Summer3

@Summer3

Trailblazer

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

Originally posted by: cal-gal
I don't know much about Mr. Rafi but Mr. Kishore Kumar, I have heard about him a lot in the television....so, i guess Mr. Kumar is more popular than Mr. Rafi........

😆 Both are very popular but KK had more wives than MR. MR was could sing classical as well as popular songs. KK came in as a "new" and modern voice in later years.

Quote

Kishore Kumar

Muhammad Rafi vs Kishore Kumar

Related Topics

Explore Topics