narottam has no claim on property - Page 2

Originally posted by: Newbiesoapfan

Adni - its ok to have your opinion and for others to have their opinion. Its not OK to shout ( use caps ) to stress your opinion... please refrain from such behavior on a public forum. Let's maintain the decorum of the forum.

Originally posted by: DV_LVR

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Illegitimate-children-entitled-to-ancestral-property-Bench/article14674196.ece

The case that changed the rules in India.

Navrottam can put a case court if he wants to. But his mothers intention is not just to get financial wealth, but to take revenge on the family and to get Baldev back on her side and to finally be recognized in society as his wife I guess, so Navrottam will never put a case against them.

Originally posted by: tiny15

i agree wid u.

and thatswhy on oder thread i also said that illegitimate children hav equal rites. bcoz i rembr the debate was going on BV forum also wen DS disowned jagya 4 marrying gauri.many said gauri had no rites nor will her children will etc etc but then i rembr many oder posted that gauri's kid will hav rite on ancestral property if its not earned by DS

Originally posted by: Newbiesoapfan

Here's a clause that may nullify it

"However, one thing must be made clear that the benefit given under the amended Section 16 is available only in cases where there is a marriage but such marriage is void or voidable. In the case of joint family property, such children will be entitled only to a share in their parents' property but they cannot claim it on their own right. Logically, on the partition of an ancestral property, the property falling in the share of the parents of such children is regarded as their self-acquired and absolute property.

We don't know if Sudha and Baldev had a marriage... or only got intimate. So it may be moot . Sudha is clearing wanting baldev ( as a husband ) so I am sure she wasn't married ever to him ( check today's episode).

Originally posted by: Mangothyme

Baldev is not the heir because Narottam could have a claim on Royal Steel then

But Narottam as a son of Baldev has a claim on LM. Ancestral property is 4 generations and LM should be older. He has more of a claim than Avdoot or similar I would think. The fact that he is illegitimate does not matter as long as he is Baldev's son.

Originally posted by: adni143

We can't go by logic
Even pujan has claim
But according to this serial only and only baldev and satrupa son can be made heir
The will is made in such a way that today Vikram even has no potential to change it as power of attorney of will is with satrupa
Otherwise Vikram would have made AVDOOT legal heir very before
Only if you want logic then you can think that Vikram may have asked baldev to sell his part of property and disowned him this baldev has no claim and that's why narottam
If your father sold his share of property then you can't claim

Originally posted by: Mangothyme

If Narottam decides to fight in the courts he could have a claim with LM as it is ancestral property and Vikram cannot write a will for it. Royal Steel belongs to him (self acquired property) so he can do as he wishes.