Fed up with this brat named Anami - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

24

Views

2.7k

Users

11

Likes

87

Frequent Posters

BlueWinterRose thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: DV_LVR


A court would give sudha equal rights on property once DNA test proves novrottam is related. The courts wouldnt throw it out.

Are you implying Sudha is Vikramaditya's daughter. Sudha has zero claim to anything. Narottam has been recognized and included as a family member. At best Narottam can claim inheritance. Sudha has zero groud as the mistress.

Santiago24 thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: DV_LVR


Vatsalya grew up in a family loved and adored by all and also trained right from birth on how to be royalty, anami grew up with a poor pandit family that lives on others rituals and the fact that her own blood didnt want her.

I am very much surprised your expecting poise from anami at this stage 😛


DV.. I didnt mean poise as in grace etc.. I meant poise in the context of being balanced.. a balanced head.. pov etc.. 😊
Mangothyme thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: Santiago24


DV.. I didnt mean poise as in grace etc.. I meant poise in the context of being balanced.. a balanced head.. pov etc.. 😊


Anami is 17 and she was balanced in Benaras because she was constantly corrected, reminded and told stories to give her values . Darthi Pranam karo was something she was constantly reminded. In LM she has lost a lot of those things. Sudha is the one who tells her Darthi Pranam Karo, I don't think she did that to trick Anami into thinking she is good, it could have came out automatically because Sudha has those values.

Anami is drifting in LM with no one to tell her good from bad. If she had cut the tutor's hair in Benaras Madhoo and Murari Pathak would have blasted her. Here Satrupa pays her off. She did not think it is wrong. Anami has lost her balance, she needs to reconnect with the Pathaks to regain it.


emmaringo2 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: Mangothyme

It's the war between nature and nurture I think.

Anami's good qualities and likability was at its highest in Benaras. It was directly due to the daily influence of Murari Pathak and Madhoo. But there too she was arrogant and did her own thing without listening to anyone. She never stopped calling Madhoo, Pagli Panditayen even though she asked her to. She took Ladoo to fight fake sanyasis which Madhoo did not want. She always did what she felt was right, but she was good because the parvarish or nurture was good and most of all she was loved, accepted for who she was and was a valued member of a family without any conditions.
Anami's true nature is coming out in LM without the parvarish or the nurture of the Pathaks. She is not as nice or likable in LM. She is also facing a lot of expectations like how to be a heir and be a member of a royal family without proper training and most of all love or acceptance. The fact that Anami's Tevar is what Satrupa her birth mother found in common with her and not her kindness or sense of justice is nature at its most basic which is not a very nice character trait. It is the trait that made Anami cut off the tutor's hair and Satrupa paid her off and never corrected Anami. Madhoo Pathak would have slapped her. Satrupa has expectations of Anami but does nothing to bond with her. You need to bond with someone to give them a sense of loyalty, of belonging. The LM wasis have failed to give her that except Dadi.

Anami would have got angry at anyone who dared eat from Murari Pathak's plate except Madhoo. She is fiercely loyal and protective of her, she feels nothing for Satrupa. Loyalty and love must be earned. After 17 years of nothing, Satrupa cannot expect that from Anami especially when she threatened her and the Pathaks every time. Anami looks for approval and acceptance from Satrupa, even today in the dining table she was looking at Satrupa. Everyone wants to be needed for themselves. Baldev was about to leave and stopped because Vikram told him he needed him after so many years. The day Satrupa shows her vulnerable side and shows Anami she loves her, not because she LM heir or Vatsalya replacement but because she is Anami, she will get her loyalty. That day Anami herself will throw Sudha out.


So even after all these years of good "parvarish" from her adoptive parents, the values still haven't been instilled in her? She still need to be reminded on a daily basis what is good behavior and what is not? She needs to constantly be on Pagli Panditayan's leash in order to behave? What is she a horse? Even dogs behave properly if they are given that many years of training.

Anami is just a rude, obnoxious brat and even the Pandit's upbringing couldn't do a good job on her.
emmaringo2 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: DV_LVR


Vatsalya grew up in a family loved and adored by all and also trained right from birth on how to be royalty, anami grew up with a poor pandit family that lives on others rituals and the fact that her own blood didnt want her.

I am very much surprised your expecting poise from anami at this stage 😛

So you are saying that the poor pandits are SO poor that they could not even afford to give Anami proper values or teach her how to behave? Being rich or poor has nothing to do with whether a person's bratty or well-behaved. Usually it is the rich kids who are obnoxious, disrespectful and bratty because they get everything in life easily and have no sense of values. But here the opposite is the case.

And just like Vastalya, Anami also got the love and adoration of everybody in her vicinity. Her adoptive parents love her, her brother loves her, the people love her. So what's her damn excuse for being a totally irresponsible brat? Sorry but your argument fails completely.
bips thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 7 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: DV_LVR


A court would give sudha equal rights on property once DNA test proves novrottam is related. The courts wouldnt throw it out.




Ummm... No... Right on ancestral property is NOT given to a child born outside of marriage... And lal mahal's entire property is ancestral...


An illegitimate child can only claim a share in father's own income outside of ancestral / family property... And baldev has no job and hence no income of his own.. He is living on family money..


Hence nurottum gets a big fat zero...


And sudha as the other woman has even less rights than nurutoom.. She can only claim maintenance for daily living expenses which LM people are already giving her... No property for her too
Edited by bips - 7 years ago
tiny15 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 7 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: bips



Ummm... No... Right on ancestral property is NOT given to a child born outside of marriage... And lal mahal's entire property is ancestral...


An illegitimate child can only claim a share in father's own income outside of ancestral / family property... And baldev has no job and hence no income of his own.. He is living on family money..


Hence nurottum gets a big fat zero...


And sudha as the other woman has even less rights than nurutoom.. She can only claim maintenance for daily living expenses which LM people are already giving her... No property for her too

actually u r wrong.any child whether legitimate or not can claim rites on property & has rites on it esply if its ancestral but not on self earned.so narttam has full rites on LM property but not on RS as its self earned.
now court has made this law that any child from 2nd wife or oder women r entitled 2 get property rites in ancestral property but not on self earned of the father's family.but i agree sudha can't claim rites on property

and i m sure of this.
DV_LVR thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: emmaringo2

So you are saying that the poor pandits are SO poor that they could not even afford to give Anami proper values or teach her how to behave? Being rich or poor has nothing to do with whether a person's bratty or well-behaved. Usually it is the rich kids who are obnoxious, disrespectful and bratty because they get everything in life easily and have no sense of values. But here the opposite is the case.

And just like Vastalya, Anami also got the love and adoration of everybody in her vicinity. Her adoptive parents love her, her brother loves her, the people love her. So what's her damn excuse for being a totally irresponsible brat? Sorry but your argument fails completely.


Anami is well-behaved with everyone except the family in case you have failed to notice..and thats why she is in the soup in the first place... she believes in everyone being good and by experience she has seen only her birth parents being manupilative and calculative not being the typical parents in India are.. Starupa chose to keep her son over her daughter and Baldev treats his son as a slave evyday and acts as if he is non-existant.

And her adoptive mother in the heat of moment did once say she is after all not her blood so what can she expect from her. No matter how well loved you are, the fact that your not their own will always be a feel inside.

Anami sees her own pagli panditayan in sudha bcoz sudha is playing the same card. another kid seperated from their mother coz of satrupa and baldev.

So of course she will support sudha, her situation is closest to what anami is going thru.

I think you are seeing only as a married women and not all angles, which is exactly what the chakravuh part is in the serial ..
DV_LVR thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: Santiago24


DV.. I didnt mean poise as in grace etc.. I meant poise in the context of being balanced.. a balanced head.. pov etc.. 😊


ahh ok ok ..
DV_LVR thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: bips



Ummm... No... Right on ancestral property is NOT given to a child born outside of marriage... And lal mahal's entire property is ancestral...


An illegitimate child can only claim a share in father's own income outside of ancestral / family property... And baldev has no job and hence no income of his own.. He is living on family money..


Hence nurottum gets a big fat zero...


And sudha as the other woman has even less rights than nurutoom.. She can only claim maintenance for daily living expenses which LM people are already giving her... No property for her too


http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Illegitimate-children-entitled-to-ancestral-property-Bench/article14674196.ece

The benchmark case that changed the rules in India..

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".