Anami is REALLY annoying!!!!! - Page 3

Originally posted by: tiny15

don't find anami annoying except wen she trust narottam & sudha blindly. i can understand her issues wid satrupa whos really selfish & arrogant 2 the core but shes not even heading wid the advice of adhiraj & daadi also who r thinking 4 her well being. i cna understand all ckts but satrupa is beyond me.

like sum1 said why"ll anami listen 2 her wen she herself said it was her decision 2 abandon anami in favour of vatsyalya.satrupa wudn't'd even thot of anami if guruji'dnt asked him 2 bring her back. so i dont hav an iota of sympathy 4 her.

and ystrday epi made me think satrupa goes in self pitying & self victim mode if sum1 tries 2 blame her ro try 2 remind her her mistakes.the only thing i felt wen she said 2 vikram that she was not told abt baldev's past

Originally posted by: tiny15

@trishakti exactly.i can even understand satrupa's abandoning anami at birth. lets give her BOD or weakness 4 her son but wat she did wid pathak family who so lovingly & nicely brought up anami is not 4giveable.why shud anami feel any sympathy or anything 4 her. just bcoz shes her bio mother.if guruji or sum1else'd asked satrupa 2 abandon anami in favour of son & sort EMB or forced i cud'd 4given that but not just that but wat shes doing rite now wid anami's foster family is not acceptable.just 2 hav her upper hand shes blackmailing anami.actually seeing satrupa's ckt i think she doesn't know how 2 balance business & prsnl relationships. her approach 2wards anami is not riet. she shud go back in BG till anami softens & she shud hav stopped threatening anami abt her foster parents every now & then just bcoz anami is not listening her.she shud let daadi & sum1else handle anami.

tho as a couple i like baldev-satrupa but as a ckt both esply satrupa hasn't gained my sympathy except in case of her mrg wid baldev where she was kept in dark abt his past & accept him despite having a child from oder woman out of wedlock.

Originally posted by: Ssanjinika

Hmmm...

My two cents on Satrupa 'abandoning' Anami when she was a baby.

Abandoning baby technically should leave the baby outside somewhere without caring about what happens to it.

Satrupa did not do that. She and/or Guruji found a family-one that did not have any children- to raise her. They were sure that Pathak and his wife would love and bring her up to the best of their abilities. To me, that is similar to Krishna being given to Yashoda to be brought up.

As to her threatening Pathak's family, Krishna always knew who he was and what his duties were but Anami did not. She did not understand her duties and could not see past her own hurt. Satrupa did not have any choice but to use the only weakness of Anami which was her family.

Yes, her mother gave her up but she gave her to a wonderful family to be raised. She did not leave her in an orphanage or worse, throw her outside in the garbage can. I think it has already been established that Dadaji was the one who was biased against girl children in the family. Maybe that's why Anami and not Vatsalya was given away?

Maybe in the seventeen years, she has stayed away from her daughter, she was taking comfort in the fact that Anami was being looked after lovingly by her adopted family?

Anami has duties apart from being just the daughter of a pandit's family. She has people who will depend on her for their livelihood. She has to prepare herself to take charge and do her duty to the best of her abilities..she cannot afford to be weak. Not when thousands of families will depend on her.

That's what Mahabharata was about. That's what the Chkravuh has shown so far.

The more I see Satrupa, the more I am in awe of her character.

And yeah...I am getting a little tired of Anami's self-righteous anger all the time. She is like the horse with blinders...doesn't bother to see around. Girl with no clue!!

Originally posted by: Ssanjinika

Hmmm...

My two cents on Satrupa 'abandoning' Anami when she was a baby.

Abandoning baby technically should leave the baby outside somewhere without caring about what happens to it.

Satrupa did not do that. She and/or Guruji found a family-one that did not have any children- to raise her. They were sure that Pathak and his wife would love and bring her up to the best of their abilities. To me, that is similar to Krishna being given to Yashoda to be brought up.

As to her threatening Pathak's family, Krishna always knew who he was and what his duties were but Anami did not. She did not understand her duties and could not see past her own hurt. Satrupa did not have any choice but to use the only weakness of Anami which was her family.

Yes, her mother gave her up but she gave her to a wonderful family to be raised. She did not leave her in an orphanage or worse, throw her outside in the garbage can. I think it has already been established that Dadaji was the one who was biased against girl children in the family. Maybe that's why Anami and not Vatsalya was given away?

Maybe in the seventeen years, she has stayed away from her daughter, she was taking comfort in the fact that Anami was being looked after lovingly by her adopted family?

Anami has duties apart from being just the daughter of a pandit's family. She has people who will depend on her for their livelihood. She has to prepare herself to take charge and do her duty to the best of her abilities..she cannot afford to be weak. Not when thousands of families will depend on her.

That's what Mahabharata was about. That's what the Chkravuh has shown so far.

The more I see Satrupa, the more I am in awe of her character.

And yeah...I am getting a little tired of Anami's self-righteous anger all the time. She is like the horse with blinders...doesn't bother to see around. Girl with no clue!!

Originally posted by: Ayuzawa

This is what i fail to understand. How can Satrupa be justified in giving up her baby😲

It's true that it was guruji and not satrupa who chose the pathak family for anami. Satrupa during all these 17 years did not even bother to ask guruji where her daughter was and it was only when Vatsalya and guruji reminded her of the daughter that she decided to go bring back her daughter.

She had no idea about her daughter so what if in this 17 years the pathaks after having a child of their own would have thrown her out or would have met with an accident and died.

Now as per the circumstances it's as if Satrupa put out her daughter for adoption and Some good family adopted her. So in that way Satrupa literally has no right on her. Imagine if the real parents of each adopted child came and demanded for their child back.

Not only that Satrupa came anf blamed the family that raised her with love of kidnapping her which not only makes them criminals but also destroys their reputation in the neighborhood.

In case of Krishna, if he was not given up to Nanda he would have been killed but here Satrupa's children simply wouldn't have become the heir. That's not a big deal.

Another thing is, Krishna himself decided to return but here Anami didn't. And why should she. She literally had no connection to RS or LM. Just coz she has the blood of LM she should throw her entire life away and train and head a company which might not even be her career choice. What is she wanted to be a doctor or something. Then why are we even complaining about neopotism.🥱

I personally feel no matter what flaws Anami has her anger on Satrupa is completely justified and Satrupa doesn't deserve forgiveness until and unless she apologizes to both Anami and Pathaks for what she did to them.

Just the way Anami needs to learn and accept her mistakes with regards to her behavior with every one else other than Satrupa, Satrupa too should understand and accept her wrong doings.

Originally posted by: Ssanjinika

I Agree with a lot of the points you say...but all I am saying is that maybe the circumstances were difficult. How do we know that satrupa did not grieve for her daughter? So far, they have just shown her with Vatsalya who was the only one who made her happy. Maybe she worried for her daughter when she was alone? Maybe Guruji told her to forget her daughter and that she was doing well. You forget that she blindly trusted guruji.

I bolded a point you made and thought I would reply to that . Satrupa had already lost two babies...twins that did not survive. When she gave birth to another set of twins, she was told that she had to give up one to keep them alive otherwise she would lose both of them again. So, in her mind, she was saving her babies by giving up one. Who is to say what a mother in her position would do? I have even heard of mothers killing one child in a set of twins in order for at least one of them to survive. Giving up one to a good life doesn't seem bad enough for me.

I agree Satrupa comes across as being selfish, but she doesn't seem to want the money for herself. Vatsalya said Satrupa is the best mother a person could have. Doesn't that deserve a benefit of doubt?

I have no issues with Anami doing everything to spite Satrupa. In fact it is entertaining to watch them thwat each other. But, I cannot stand Anami spouting hatred and harming others to spite her mother. That's downright disgusting. I hated what she did to that poor tutor. Anways, we'll see how this plays out.