Originally posted by: ...Deeksha...
@ MiraThis comment I have posted in other post to buy I find it apt here for your last para pages here. Same as your view but a slight difference
For me Satrupa is no less then Kunthi when it comes to twins birth. She need to keep one child that to boy and sacrifice the girl. Here Satrupa has taken correct step by choosing a boy over girl. Because if she kept boy and have girl away. Then her family may force her for boy child and if not it is indirectly the heritage goes to avdoot. As much as we feel sick this the society where girl on throne is still discriminated. Then what has changed, then the answer is trust. Trust that family has on Satrupa, that she will take every step soch samajkey. If the same happened 17 years back then Balraj would be made to marry other girl.
I was only suspecting that Satrupa had a very solid reason for her action. She could very well be Kunti too.. A mother who thought of her own social standings and situation ... she was not wrong. But she did wrong her child...
She is Kunti and Krishna ... Kunti wouldnt have played this game of thrones (although one version of MB written by M.T, which will soon be made into movie shows her as a manipulative powerful person as Satrupa is in our story. But this is just one persons POV novel)
So I am attributing some facets of Krishna to Satrupa ... Her end game is justice and she will use any means to reach their ... but she is not Krishna ... and unlike Krishna, she doesnt know that fine line ...