ONE CHANCE GIVEN 2.8
71st National Film Awards (Celebrating 2023)
CID Episode 65 - 2 August
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 02 August 2025 EDT
YRKKH SM updates, BTS and Spoilers Thread #124
Congratulations SRK National Award
Makers mission to prove Navri incompetent in all aspects.
A joke called National award
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 03 August 2025 EDT
🎉 Book Talk Forum July 2025 Reading Challenge Winners👏
Asli Gunehgar
ONE MONTH TIME 3.8
Congratulations National Award Winning Actress Rani Mukerji
Saiyaara Male lead is overrated!!!
Anupamaa 02 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
A very interesting point you made...End justifies the means... But in this I always had a different interpretation ... It was not just Kaurava's, lord Krishna to an extent enforced this idea... the killing of Karna who was defenseless, the trick of solar eclipse or the final implied lie to murder Drona... the end was victory of dharma ...but Krishna's means were not always righteous
I am seeing a Krishna in Satrupa ... There is a point in MB where Karna enters battle field... with his unbeatable weapon Satki. He had kept it for Arjun... and Arjun alone was his aim. But in the larger scheme of things, Krishna wanted Arjun to live ... so he was the one to suggest to make Kadholkacha the pawn. Let lose the half demon son of Bhima on the kuru army ... make it so impossible for Karna to do nothing but to aim the one time usable Shakti astra on him...Was it right? Half demon or not, he was but a child ... a son. What was the justification to this? anything but the end game ... The aim of putting the righteous man on the throne ...
Wasnt Satrupa also doing something same? She sacrificed Anami ... to have Vatsalya alive ... to put him on the thrones that she deemed his birth right. A girl will not be accepted by society ... she will be forced to give a male heir ... with a man she might no longer be in love with... was she right? No... but maybe her aim wasnt all that bad ... we are yett to see that
A very interesting point you made...End justifies the means... But in this I always had a different interpretation ... It was not just Kaurava's, lord Krishna to an extent enforced this idea... the killing of Karna who was defenseless, the trick of solar eclipse or the final implied lie to murder Drona... the end was victory of dharma ...but Krishna's means were not always righteous
I am seeing a Krishna in Satrupa ... There is a point in MB where Karna enters battle field... with his unbeatable weapon Satki. He had kept it for Arjun... and Arjun alone was his aim. But in the larger scheme of things, Krishna wanted Arjun to live ... so he was the one to suggest to make Kadholkacha the pawn. Let lose the half demon son of Bhima on the kuru army ... make it so impossible for Karna to do nothing but to aim the one time usable Shakti astra on him...Was it right? Half demon or not, he was but a child ... a son. What was the justification to this? anything but the end game ... The aim of putting the righteous man on the throne ...
Wasnt Satrupa also doing something same? She sacrificed Anami ... to have Vatsalya alive ... to put him on the thrones that she deemed his birth right. A girl will not be accepted by society ... she will be forced to give a male heir ... with a man she might no longer be in love with... was she right? No... but maybe her aim wasnt all that bad ... we are yett to see that
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@deeksha yes it was an important lesson. Coming to satrupa she had to be intimidate because anami was adamant. @mira didn't Krishna knew what was going to happen to abhimanyu.second Krishna is about justice not revenge. Pandavas also had to pay for what happened to panchali in infamous hall of dice.he couldn't eliminate that karma which pandavas pay with their children. But he reduces the impact by saving parikshit. The message was clear. Disrespect to woman is war and end of lineage. If u look from arjun perspective Krishna does adharma. Takes curse of gandhari too.he is God. For arjun he does adharma. If u stand in arjun position i only told chose the right path from ur end.leave the decision of adharma dharma to him. If ur path is right he stands in defence. And u need to know he is justice. So as per ur karma u will also lose something but he will reduce the impact. Don't try to be Krishna unless u have his knowledge of dharma adharma. Try to be arjun and surrender to him. I always tell don't judge Krishna without knowing arjun.it is like seeing flower without understanding it's fragrance. It is like seeing light without understanding vaccum. If u need to understand Krishna become his arjuna .
Originally posted by: ...Deeksha...
@ MiraThis comment I have posted in other post to buy I find it apt here for your last para pages here. Same as your view but a slight difference
For me Satrupa is no less then Kunthi when it comes to twins birth. She need to keep one child that to boy and sacrifice the girl. Here Satrupa has taken correct step by choosing a boy over girl. Because if she kept boy and have girl away. Then her family may force her for boy child and if not it is indirectly the heritage goes to avdoot. As much as we feel sick this the society where girl on throne is still discriminated. Then what has changed, then the answer is trust. Trust that family has on Satrupa, that she will take every step soch samajkey. If the same happened 17 years back then Balraj would be made to marry other girl.