To tolerate ur humilation is my choice and not compulsion - Page 2

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

Actually guys this is analysis of 2 days.also typing from mobile. So it will be short. For me satrupa stole both days.it showed what kind of a woman she is. Vikram lost it when satrupa came in front of guruji . Why did vikram wanted to kill guruji.why he has to distrust him. Because his words that a girl is the lone heir of an empire could be truth and he cannot accept it.he cannot accept his bahu trying to give power to the girl. His unacceptance of that decision which guruji has blessed. One thing came about satrupa.if ur with her in good and bad u will find her with u.in fact she will stand in front. Brave and courageous lady. But the second day brought her fault lines.She tells tolerating humiliation is her choice. No it is her compulsion which the death of vatsalya made her do.She also told love in her died with vatsalya.What she is doing for anami is only duty. Not sure when she can give mamta to the girl.unless she can evoke mamta or vatsalya for anami she cannot win anami. Another interesting point I noted was guruji telling who will save Lal Mahal from anami. In yesterday episode the ball aimed for the boy hits straight adhiraj. So he will take the blow for which anami will have to say sorry. She will have to bend when her so called fight starts harming unintended people and that will force her to re evaluate her motives and goals and do course correction.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

Yes Bhavi Kanha had to be called Devakinandan to remember Devaki, otherwise his childhood is always remembered with Yasodha, the makhan chor that he was 😃. Infact Devaki mostly doesnt come to picture, it is Yasodha mostly and then the women he loved, married and respected if you look at Krishna's story. Radha, Rukmini, Bhama, Panchali

Also we dont know whose child Sita really was, but she is janak dulari, janaki daughter of Janaka though she was not his blood.

madhoo says it right, more than the bandhan of birth, the bandhan of karma is more. Nothing can replace madhoo's love for Anami. Satrupa at best can be Anami's mentor, a guide and yes they can bring in love, respect and mamta also. But it can never erase Madhoo and Murari from Anami's life.

Coming to your disagreement, these are initial phases, I am also doing guess work. That's why I use is it, seems etc and some points I dont analyze because there is more than one responsibility.

Also one thing we need to see. Satrupa is bahu of the family not beti. A bahu remains with family and also she remains within the maryada of the family. Or rather she will always be in limits. And she was expected to have no secrets from the family. But Satrupa bought Anami as a woman, and I feel this is where Vikram is most hit. Her one of the face is that of the woman. The decision of a woman. I guess you only put that point in one of my other posts. And guruji sided with it. He sided with the decision of a woman than the Vikram's decision of making Avdhoot heir. So I feel it is the clash of decisions and it may not be exactly Anami as a heir.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@JJ you do have a point there. When the kid was given away Vikram was not kept in confidence. Guruji didnt tell him about the grand daughter.