Doubts and Discussions from the Ramayan - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

104.2k

Users

26

Likes

5

Frequent Posters

Vibhishna thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail The Rang- Rasa Cronicles Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 16 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: Chandraketu

My internet connection has been acting up, which is also why I was unable to do much in the Rakshashkul contest either. It looks like it'll be that way for some days before it gets straightened out 😭

In Krittivas Ramayan, there was only the story of Mahiravan: his wife isn't shown, and neither is Makardwaj. He is also described as a son of Ravan, as opposed to a friend, as shown here. The circumstances under which Rama & Lakshman were captured were somewhat different from what's shown, and Hanuman assumed a miniature form and went, and did not encounter so many demonic obstacles as he did here. Also, as we discussed, it was he who beheaded Mahiravan, and there was no battle between Rama & Mahiravan - it was purely Hanuman's doing. Also, the Mahiravan episode happened after the death of Indrajit & Kumbhakarna, and before Ravan; here, it actually precedes the war.

If you get hold of the ACK Mahiravan, that gives a good account of the story. I'll probably post the story of Mahiravan sometime, once my internet is back in form, and this forum doesn't seem as slow.

Thank you Chandra ji, that clears it up a bit, though I still have doubts regarding Maharadwaj.
I'll get hold of the ACK book - Mahiravan. I have read a full account of it before, but still will be waiting for your post. I might have missed something.
Regarding Maharadwaj - this is one of my completely wild guesses . . .
The Cambodian version of Ramayan - Reamker - says that Hanuman had a son who was part monkey and part fish from a princess (Yes, that is the way it is portrayed and I too was totally shocked when I read it first). The story is almost similar with the Indian versions but with . . . sort of unusual variations.
The story of Maharadwaj - Hanuman, a white monkey general (somtimes a monkey king), flies to Lanka and learns that Sita (Neang Seda in Cambodia), the wife of Ram (Phreah Ream) is held captive there. On his return, he gives orders to his soldiers to build a bridge that connects the mainland to the island. The monkey soldiers start the huge task - it is not easy to fill the belly of the sea with stones. But something strange was happening. Everytime a monkey had left a stone on the surface of the sea and returned with another one to place next to it, the original stone was gone. Hanuman and his soldiers were baffled. Hanuman dives into the sea to investigate (sometimes it is said that Hanuman went to the sea bed with some of his choicest soldiers). There he found mermaids carrying off the stones they had used for the bridge to the depths of the sea. Hanuman tried to catch the mermaids but it was not as easy as jumping from tree to tree. They were in the deep sea waters and the mermais were very very elusive. Hanuman spotted an extrememly beautiful mermaid among them all. He realised that this one was the leader and thought that if he could catch her he might be able to persuade her from doing this. This mermaid was indeed the leader of the group - a princess named Sovann Machha, the daughter of Ravan and a mermaid. Hanuman chased her, but she eluded his every attempt gracefully. But the two fell in love with each other. Hanuman realised that he was drawn to her beauty and charms whereas she was drawn to his strength and determination. Eventually, Sovann and her mermaids help Hanuman to complete the bridge. Hanuman left Sovann with a child - who was born later as part monkey and part fish (He had the body of a monkey and a fish's tail) and was brought up by Ravan and his family. He later fought against his father Hanuman in the war (I don't know what happens to him after that).
The reasons I think Maharadwaj's story comes from here is because he (Maharadwaj) was found in a fish's belly (some say its a crocodile) and then raised by Mahiravan (or Ahiravan) and appointed as the guardian of the gates of Patalpuri.
I stumbled upon this story when I was searching for the origin of the story of Maharadwaj. But could a Cambodian legend find its way into an age old Indian epic? Reamker claims to be a retelling of an Indian Epic Ramayan.
Another story common in South India on how and why Maharadwaj was born:
Lord Shiva, in the Himalayas, kept chanting a mantra continuously. The power of that mantra rippled all over the world and gave a surge of goodness to all. Devi Parvati asked Lord Shiva what mantra that was. Lord Shiva replied that it was the name of the next incarnation of Lord Vishnu - the name that will be the universal mantra till the end of days - RAM. He also told her that he will be taking active part in this avtaar. Devi Parvati asked longingly that she too be allowed to participate in the events. Lord Shiva refused blatantly saying that he will be a brahmachari in this avtaar as Hanuman and he cannot accept any women in that life. Devi Parvati silently swore that she won' t be left out and that she will come down to earth and bear him a son without spoiling his vow of celibacy. And hence she was the crocodile (or fish) who swallowed Hanuman's sweat drops and bore the son Maharadwaj.
That is all the information I have regarding this topic. I do not mean any offece by positng the first story. I am merely sharing the information I've read before.
Vibhishna thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail The Rang- Rasa Cronicles Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 16 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: Mandodari



I googled and in one of the websites I read that the episode where Lakshman gets gyan from Ravan is in Ramcharitmanas. Anyone on the forum a big Ramcharitmanas expert? Please let us know if the random web information is correct or not.

I'm not a big expert in Rama Charita Manasa, but I don't remember reading this incident in the translation of the Rama Charita Manasa. The 31 arrows hitting Ravan was from this book, but I don't think Lakshman receiving knowledge from Ravan was from here.
bharat9 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#23
There were 31 arrows that were supposed to hit Ravan's 20 arms, 10 heads and 1 for navel.
It did and when it did so, the 9 extra heads were destroyed and so did his 18 arms. But then what about his 10th head and the last pair of arms. They were also hit but were not destroyed! why?
hope i havnt made my question very confusing. (although it sounds a bit!)


desichica thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#24

Wonderful idea Vibs!!! It helps a lot since i think i have the most questions 😆and queries or what have you!!!!! This way it saves space on RF too!!!!!

Edited by desichica - 16 years ago
desichica thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#25
Well here is my first question rather:
In Regards to todays epi:
When Ravan fell, all he said was Ram....in the Old Ramayan, Ravan upon falling on his demise he utters "Shree Ram"....this is to signify his acceptance of the Lord himself as re-incarnation of Shree Ram!!!!
Do you all remember when he first says to KKuncle and IJ that dont refer to Ram as Shree, b/c he says no1 is superior to Ravan in Tri-Lok???
Well i posted this query in todays update, but i dont think ne1 has noticed it...so wut better way then to ask right at our queries thread!!!
So was it said in today's epi by Ravan as Shree Ram...as i haven't watched the video...i'm basing only on updates and that's all???
Is it a blooper by Sagars, which is understandable???
Was it said in Valmiki/Tulsidas versions of Ramayan by Ravan as acceptance of Shree Ram as the Lord HIMSELF????
I hope some1 can clear my query.....i'm goin 🤪 not knowing if it was said by Ravan or not!!!!
Thanx guys!!!
bharat9 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: desichica

Well here is my first question rather:

In Regards to todays epi:
When Ravan fell, all he said was Ram....in the Old Ramayan, Ravan upon falling on his demise he utters "Shree Ram"....this is to signify his acceptance of the Lord himself as re-incarnation of Shree Ram!!!!
Do you all remember when he first says to KKuncle and IJ that dont refer to Ram as Shree, b/c he says no1 is superior to Ravan in Tri-Lok???
Well i posted this query in todays update, but i dont think ne1 has noticed it...so wut better way then to ask right at our queries thread!!!
So was it said in today's epi by Ravan as Shree Ram...as i haven't watched the video...i'm basing only on updates and that's all???
Is it a blooper by Sagars, which is understandable???
Was it said in Valmiki/Tulsidas versions of Ramayan by Ravan as acceptance of Shree Ram as the Lord HIMSELF????
I hope some1 can clear my query.....i'm goin 🤪 not knowing if it was said by Ravan or not!!!!
Thanx guys!!!



i guess i understand from where your point is coming from.
but, like you, i am also not sure whether Ravan said Shri Ram or Ram!
maybe someone else with better knowledge will answer this question very soon.
mango27 thumbnail
Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail Groupbie Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#27
I have a question too...
In some previous threads about the agni pareeksha, someone explained that Shri Ram never doubted Sitaji but had to show everyone else that Sitaji was pure so he asked her to do the pareeksha (not thinking about the maya Sita version right now)...
Wouldn't it have been better if Shri Ram had asked Sitaji to do the pareeksha in Ayodhya rather than Lanka as in Lanka no one doubted Sitaji, but in Ayodhya ppl did. Or did the ppl of Ayodhya knew about Sitaji giving the pareeksha and still doubted her?
Hope I haven't made it too confusing.
desichica thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: mango27

I have a question too...

In some previous threads about the agni pareeksha, someone explained that Shri Ram never doubted Sitaji but had to show everyone else that Sitaji was pure so he asked her to do the pareeksha (not thinking about the maya Sita version right now)...
Wouldn't it have been better if Shri Ram had asked Sitaji to do the pareeksha in Ayodhya rather than Lanka as in Lanka no one doubted Sitaji, but in Ayodhya ppl did. Or did the ppl of Ayodhya knew about Sitaji giving the pareeksha and still doubted her?
Hope I haven't made it too confusing.

Hey dear,
I think it wud have been better if Ramji did do the pareeksha at Ayodhya, it wud make more sense since the washerman of Ayodhya was the one who put a mar on Sita maya's character.
Second to answer ur question...the REAL reason the Agni Pareeksha was done was to bring back the REAL Sita mata from under the protection of Agni Dev!!!! To further explain this confusion, b4 Sita haraan, Ramji told Sita maya that it was bout time for Ravan to send Mareech to come disguised as a golden deer and that Sita maya wud be kidnapped from that maya created by Ravan himself!!!! So Sita maya calls upon Agni Dev, & she is under the care and protection of Agni Dev, while it is Chaaya Sita (Sita's shadow) that is held captive by Ravan!!!!!
Now for it to make further sense, When Ravan had raped Nal-Kuber's wife, the son of Kuber (who is also the half-brother of Ravan), Nal-Kuber cursed Ravan that whenever he wud touch a woman against her will or force her in any matter, Ravan's head wud turn into ashes right then and there!!!!!
So you see if it was actually Sita maya, then Ravan wud have burst into ashes right then and there, but he touched a Shadow of Sita maya, so for this purpose Ramji tells Chaya Sita to call upon Agni dev to return his beloved Sita from Agni Dev back to HIM (Ramji)!!!!
Hope this helped you out dear!!!
Vibhishna thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail The Rang- Rasa Cronicles Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 16 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: desichica

Well here is my first question rather:

In Regards to todays epi:
When Ravan fell, all he said was Ram....in the Old Ramayan, Ravan upon falling on his demise he utters "Shree Ram"....this is to signify his acceptance of the Lord himself as re-incarnation of Shree Ram!!!!
Do you all remember when he first says to KKuncle and IJ that dont refer to Ram as Shree, b/c he says no1 is superior to Ravan in Tri-Lok???
Well i posted this query in todays update, but i dont think ne1 has noticed it...so wut better way then to ask right at our queries thread!!!
So was it said in today's epi by Ravan as Shree Ram...as i haven't watched the video...i'm basing only on updates and that's all???
Is it a blooper by Sagars, which is understandable???
Was it said in Valmiki/Tulsidas versions of Ramayan by Ravan as acceptance of Shree Ram as the Lord HIMSELF????
I hope some1 can clear my query.....i'm goin 🤪 not knowing if it was said by Ravan or not!!!!
Thanx guys!!!

In todays episode, Ravan said just the name "Ram". I don't think that Valmiki Ramayan or Tulsidas Ramayan depicts Ravan accepting Lord Ram as the Lord of the Universe. Only the details of Ravan getting hit by Ram's arrow and breathing his last were given if I'm not mistaken. I don't know if it is so in any other version of the Ramayan.
In many movies, drama, serials, it is depicted as Ravan dying after saying 'Ram' and sometimes, Ram gives darshan as Lord Vishnu just before he dies and he realises that it is Lord Narayan who has come as Ram and remembers his curse to be born thrice on earth and salutes him before he breathes his last.
desichica thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#30
Thanx so much Vibhishna...see i was basically confused from the Old Ramayan and New Ramayan, I didn't know if that was supposed to happen and take place and mentioned in Valmiki or Tulsidas version!!!!
But thanx for clearing my crazy questions!!!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".