🏏 IPL 2026: Match 3, RR vs CSK at Guwahati 🏏
🏏 IPL 2026: Match 4, PBKS vs GT at New Chandigarh🏏
EK DIL & EK JAAN 30.3
Newyork (2009)..Did the movie humanize terrorists?
Coming Soon - Rama Official Teaser - Ramayana
Sonam Kapoor and Anand welcome their second baby boy
NAACH-GAANA 31.3
Who saved Yaman-The dragon
Originally posted by: rajnish_here
agree with u vibhision ji its nice idea... you can change ur title to "post your doubt on epic Ramayan here" if you wish, great job👏
Originally posted by: Vibhishna
I'll change the tilte. I couldn't come up with a better one. (Sorry if it seemed like stealing your title). I'll change it soon.
Originally posted by: Mandodari
Vibishna, I had a doubt. I know about Indra giving the chariot to Ramji for the final battle with Ravan. Was it okay for Ramji to accept a chariot because he was supposed to be a Vanavasi for 14 years without any kingly things? What is the explanation for that?
Originally posted by: Vibhishna
I'm trying to answer to the best of my ability. I had thought about it too. If Ram needed to be air borne, Hanuman could have done it. I think, the chariot was a necessity at that moment. Being a Vanvasi without kingly comforts - Ram did not own the chariot - it was given for that one battle and not for Ram to own. So, I think it was alright for Ram to accept it.