No criticism about Ramayan characters, please!

RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#1
I have been reading a lot of criticism about the characters of Ramayan, and I don't think it is acceptable at all. It is a holy purana, and we should learn the morals from it, instead of questioning each and every motive/action of some of the characters. I would appreciate it if people can refrain from calling Vibhishan a Kul-Drohi, or Sugriva as a lustful man. And there are other examples also. An article in particular, called Truth of Sugriva, is very offensive. I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings, but remember, the Ramayana is a beautiful epic full to the brim with morals. If anyone doubts the motives or actions of some of the characters, then discuss it as a question, but don't outright say that so and so character is immoral!
Please tell me you opinion about this post. I hope I didn't offend anyone.
Edited by godisone - 16 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

1.6k

Users

5

Likes

2

Frequent Posters

246851 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#2

Originally posted by: godisone

I have been reading a lot of criticism about the characters of Ramayan, and I don't think it is acceptable at all. It is a holy purana, and we should learn the morals from it, instead of questioning each and ever motive/action of some of the characters. I would appreciate it if people can refrain from calling Vibhishan a Kul-Drohi, or Sugriva as a lustful man. And there are other examples also. An article in particular, called The Truth about Sugriva, is very offensive, and I don't want to see that kind of material again. Please! I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings, but remember, the Ramayana is a beautiful epic full to the brim with morals. If anyone doubts the motives or actions of some of the characters, then discuss it as a question, but don't outright say that so and so character is immoral!

Please tell me you opinion about this post. I hope I didn't offend anyone.

i differ from you wholeheartedly, true there are morals to be taught in ramayan but that does not mean that we cannot criticise the characters considering them as human beings, we cannot test them from different points of views instead of taking them as uni dimensional one,
we all respect ramayan and thats the reason we are here to discuss, but just because you "don't want to see that kind of material " u cannot ask us not to discuss the things we feel to discuss with opne mind, end of the day its an open discussion forum
may be although Bhibishan was virtuous and did what some one with sense would have done, ahd not he acted a bit selfish too? had he not broken ties with family and joined the enemy?
let everyone discuss what they want to and do not take any offense
diva82 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: its me tan

i differ from you wholeheartedly, true there are morals to be taught in ramayan but that does not mean that we cannot criticise the characters considering them as human beings, we cannot test them from different points of views instead of taking them as uni dimensional one,
we all respect ramayan and thats the reason we are here to discuss, but just because you "don't want to see that kind of material " u cannot ask us not to discuss the things we feel to discuss with opne mind, end of the day its an open discussion forum
may be although Bhibishan was virtuous and did what some one with sense would have done, ahd not he acted a bit selfish too? had he not broken ties with family and joined the enemy?
let everyone discuss what they want to and do not take any offense



Ah, but was it the enemy? When he knew it was the LORD himself.
Did he do the wrong thing, when his OWN brother became lustful, deceitful and STOLE someone elses wife?
Did he leave? Or was he kick out?

I can not remember where I read it, from which scriptures, but I can safely that the Lord can tolerate whatever things said about him, Good or bad, but he can't tolerate what is being said about his devotees.

So, I would be very careful, before things are said about vibshan, surgiva etc.
Remember to pray for forgiveness by saying Shri Ram.

Another point, IF Shri Ram asked his devotees "what do you want me to do about this person who has insulted you?" Do you know what the true devotees would say "Forgive them, prabhu, they are a part of you" because they understand that we have manifested from Him alone. That is why the Lord keeps them to his side. To be even a dear Friend of the Lord requires millions of merits from lot's of briths. So just imagine what category people like Vibshan and surgiva are.....

This is what Parlada did.
Edited by diva82 - 16 years ago
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: diva82



Ah, but was it the enemy? When he knew it was the LORD himself.
Did he do the wrong thing, when his OWN brother became lustful, deceitful and STOLE someone elses wife?
Did he leave? Or was he kick out?

I can not remember where I read it, from which scriptures, but I can safely that the Lord can tolerate whatever things said about him, Good or bad, but he can't tolerate what is being said about his devotees.

So, I would be very careful, before things are said about vibshan, surgiva etc.
Remember to pray for forgiveness by saying Shri Ram.

Another point, IF Shri Ram asked his devotees "what do you want me to do about this person who has insulted you?" Do you know what the true devotees would say "Forgive them, prabhu, they are a part of you" because they understand that we have manifested from Him alone. That is why the Lord keeps them to his side. To be even a dear Friend of the Lord requires millions of merits from lot's of briths. So just imagine what category people like Vibshan and surgiva are.....

This is what Parlada did.

hum, but your forgetting one thing, we are here coz we all are devotees of shree ram and we all like ramayan,but that does not mean that you can try to take away some other poeples freedoms of speech

and as i said, when people r discussing them, they r discussing the human characters, and i frankly dont think thats some thing evil done against devotees, but this is an open forum and you have as much righ to voice your thoughts as i do, so thank you for participating
diva82 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: its me tan

hum, but your forgetting one thing, we are here coz we all are devotees of shree ram and we all like ramayan,but that does not mean that you can try to take away some other poeples freedoms of speech

and as i said, when people r discussing them, they r discussing the human characters, and i frankly dont think thats some thing evil done against devotees, but this is an open forum and you have as much righ to voice your thoughts as i do, so thank you for participating



Well sorry, if you are a devotee, then one devotee would recognise another devotee.

I personally don't think I am anywhere near where what Surgiva, vidshana is etc, I think I have many lifetimes before I get even there, as I have lot's of negative tendenices and desires. And I can tell you one thing, devotees like surgiva and vibshan would say

"yes, this is right. This body has to be criticise, and the more it is, the more the ego of this body will be hit and the more I, the SELF, will be pushed towards the Lord"

And they are not human characters. They were/are real people.

I am sorry, it was my duty as a fellow devotee to alert, rest is up to you. My God forgive you and blesses you.
Edited by diva82 - 16 years ago
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: its me tan

i differ from you wholeheartedly, true there are morals to be taught in ramayan but that does not mean that we cannot criticise the characters considering them as human beings, we cannot test them from different points of views instead of taking them as uni dimensional one,
we all respect ramayan and thats the reason we are here to discuss, but just because you "don't want to see that kind of material " u cannot ask us not to discuss the things we feel to discuss with opne mind, end of the day its an open discussion forum
may be although Bhibishan was virtuous and did what some one with sense would have done, ahd not he acted a bit selfish too? had he not broken ties with family and joined the enemy?
let everyone discuss what they want to and do not take any offense

I'm sorry if you were offended. That was not my intention at all, but all I mean is that it is not at all wrong to discuss the motive of a character in a Ramayan, and why they did what they did, but don't you think it is wrong to outright say so and so character is immoral, because he did so and so? I know, I probably sound confusing right now, but I just think some constructive criticism should be used when discussing a person from a purana. I know it's very easy to talk about them as if from a story, but the Ramayana is not a fictional story. It really happened, and the characters in it are real, and they're devotees of Lord Rama (most of them). I just don't think we should talk so freely about Lord Ram's devotees as if they're characters from some fictional story. There are always things we will doubt whether it was or was not against Dharma, and that is not wrong as long as it's done constructively, but to outright say so and so is an adharmi, when he is known as a devotee of Lord Ram, is not appropriate.
And I don't think Vibhishan acted selfishly at all. He was never after the kingship of Lanka. He only wanted the family name to stay pure and the people of Lanka to stay safe.

Before Vibhishan left Lanka, he had conversed with his mother before deciding what to do. Should he join Shri Ram or not? She had told him that since Ravan exiled him, there was nothing wrong in joining Shri Ram. #1, because he had to follow Ravan, who was his elder brother's, command (and the command was to leave Lanka), and #2, if a King was doing adharm, it was the duty of his subjects to right the wrong, and since Vibhishan counted as Ravan's subject, he had to do what he could to save the family name and honor, even if it meant having a hand in killing Ravan. It wasn't because he wanted to be a king. It was because Ravan was sacrificing his sons, nephews, and subjects for one woman. If no one stood against him, the whole kingdom would have been destroyed and EVERYONE would have been blameworthy, not only Ravan. Plus, after Ravan died, Vibhishan, in his grief, refused to accept the kingship of Lanka, and Shri Ram had to lecture him on a King's Dharma to make him accept the kingship of Lanka. I think Vibhishan is completely blameless, because although he was in a big dilemma regarding his family, he did what he had to do.

RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: diva82



Ah, but was it the enemy? When he knew it was the LORD himself.
Did he do the wrong thing, when his OWN brother became lustful, deceitful and STOLE someone elses wife?
Did he leave? Or was he kick out?

I can not remember where I read it, from which scriptures, but I can safely that the Lord can tolerate whatever things said about him, Good or bad, but he can't tolerate what is being said about his devotees.

So, I would be very careful, before things are said about vibshan, surgiva etc.
Remember to pray for forgiveness by saying Shri Ram.

Another point, IF Shri Ram asked his devotees "what do you want me to do about this person who has insulted you?" Do you know what the true devotees would say "Forgive them, prabhu, they are a part of you" because they understand that we have manifested from Him alone. That is why the Lord keeps them to his side. To be even a dear Friend of the Lord requires millions of merits from lot's of briths. So just imagine what category people like Vibshan and surgiva are.....

This is what Parlada did.

You are completely right, and I especially like the sentence where you said, "the Lord can tolerate whatever things said about him, Good or bad, but he can't tolerate what is being said about his devotees."

RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#8
And I also agree that people have freedom of speech, but how far does that go when regarding the Lord? Do people really have freedom of speech to say what they like about God?
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: godisone

And I also agree that people have freedom of speech, but how far does that go when regarding the Lord? Do people really have freedom of speech to say what they like about God?

r the people actually talking against the Lord?
let people discuss what they want, at the end of the day its your faith and it depends on you only
and i did not take offense in your post coz you were trying to point out something which you did not like
but i did take offense in a particular sentence, i did not like it and i honely did not expect that sentence coming form you
else i am fine with ur topic, i am open for all sorts of discussions people do and i just want all sorts of discussions to happen, that only will make interactions better.
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: its me tan

r the people actually talking against the Lord?
let people discuss what they want, at the end of the day its your faith and it depends on you only
and i did not take offense in your post coz you were trying to point out something which you did not like
but i did take offense in a particular sentence, i did not like it and i honely did not expect that sentence coming form you
else i am fine with ur topic, i am open for all sorts of discussions people do and i just want all sorts of discussions to happen, that only will make interactions better.

Oh, I'm sorry if one of my sentences offended. I didn't mean to hurt anyone's feelings. But anyway, thanks for taking part in the discussion.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".