Bigg Boss 19: daily Discussion Thread- 1st Sept 2025.
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 01 Sep 2025 EDT
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 26
CASE IN COURT 31.8
UMAR KHAYID 1.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 2, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Bacha chor is such an incompetent lawyer🤦♀️
Why she gets bollywood movies
In this gen Cliff wali legacy maut will not happen
Happy Birthday wat_up 🎂
I wanted Abheera’s fate for Akshara
Janhvi Kapoor In Talks For Chaalbaaz Remake
Celebs pictures during Ganesh Festival
Mrunal Thakur Called Mean Girl
Jee Le Zaraa Is Happening
Originally posted by: godisone
I have been reading a lot of criticism about the characters of Ramayan, and I don't think it is acceptable at all. It is a holy purana, and we should learn the morals from it, instead of questioning each and ever motive/action of some of the characters. I would appreciate it if people can refrain from calling Vibhishan a Kul-Drohi, or Sugriva as a lustful man. And there are other examples also. An article in particular, called The Truth about Sugriva, is very offensive, and I don't want to see that kind of material again. Please! I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings, but remember, the Ramayana is a beautiful epic full to the brim with morals. If anyone doubts the motives or actions of some of the characters, then discuss it as a question, but don't outright say that so and so character is immoral!
Please tell me you opinion about this post. I hope I didn't offend anyone.
Originally posted by: its me tan
i differ from you wholeheartedly, true there are morals to be taught in ramayan but that does not mean that we cannot criticise the characters considering them as human beings, we cannot test them from different points of views instead of taking them as uni dimensional one,we all respect ramayan and thats the reason we are here to discuss, but just because you "don't want to see that kind of material " u cannot ask us not to discuss the things we feel to discuss with opne mind, end of the day its an open discussion forummay be although Bhibishan was virtuous and did what some one with sense would have done, ahd not he acted a bit selfish too? had he not broken ties with family and joined the enemy?let everyone discuss what they want to and do not take any offense
Ah, but was it the enemy? When he knew it was the LORD himself.
Did he do the wrong thing, when his OWN brother became lustful, deceitful and STOLE someone elses wife?
Did he leave? Or was he kick out?
I can not remember where I read it, from which scriptures, but I can safely that the Lord can tolerate whatever things said about him, Good or bad, but he can't tolerate what is being said about his devotees.
So, I would be very careful, before things are said about vibshan, surgiva etc.
Remember to pray for forgiveness by saying Shri Ram.
Another point, IF Shri Ram asked his devotees "what do you want me to do about this person who has insulted you?" Do you know what the true devotees would say "Forgive them, prabhu, they are a part of you" because they understand that we have manifested from Him alone. That is why the Lord keeps them to his side. To be even a dear Friend of the Lord requires millions of merits from lot's of briths. So just imagine what category people like Vibshan and surgiva are.....
This is what Parlada did.
hum, but your forgetting one thing, we are here coz we all are devotees of shree ram and we all like ramayan,but that does not mean that you can try to take away some other poeples freedoms of speech
Originally posted by: its me tan
hum, but your forgetting one thing, we are here coz we all are devotees of shree ram and we all like ramayan,but that does not mean that you can try to take away some other poeples freedoms of speech
and as i said, when people r discussing them, they r discussing the human characters, and i frankly dont think thats some thing evil done against devotees, but this is an open forum and you have as much righ to voice your thoughts as i do, so thank you for participating
Originally posted by: its me tan
i differ from you wholeheartedly, true there are morals to be taught in ramayan but that does not mean that we cannot criticise the characters considering them as human beings, we cannot test them from different points of views instead of taking them as uni dimensional one,we all respect ramayan and thats the reason we are here to discuss, but just because you "don't want to see that kind of material " u cannot ask us not to discuss the things we feel to discuss with opne mind, end of the day its an open discussion forummay be although Bhibishan was virtuous and did what some one with sense would have done, ahd not he acted a bit selfish too? had he not broken ties with family and joined the enemy?let everyone discuss what they want to and do not take any offense
Before Vibhishan left Lanka, he had conversed with his mother before deciding what to do. Should he join Shri Ram or not? She had told him that since Ravan exiled him, there was nothing wrong in joining Shri Ram. #1, because he had to follow Ravan, who was his elder brother's, command (and the command was to leave Lanka), and #2, if a King was doing adharm, it was the duty of his subjects to right the wrong, and since Vibhishan counted as Ravan's subject, he had to do what he could to save the family name and honor, even if it meant having a hand in killing Ravan. It wasn't because he wanted to be a king. It was because Ravan was sacrificing his sons, nephews, and subjects for one woman. If no one stood against him, the whole kingdom would have been destroyed and EVERYONE would have been blameworthy, not only Ravan. Plus, after Ravan died, Vibhishan, in his grief, refused to accept the kingship of Lanka, and Shri Ram had to lecture him on a King's Dharma to make him accept the kingship of Lanka. I think Vibhishan is completely blameless, because although he was in a big dilemma regarding his family, he did what he had to do.
Ah, but was it the enemy? When he knew it was the LORD himself.
Did he do the wrong thing, when his OWN brother became lustful, deceitful and STOLE someone elses wife?
Did he leave? Or was he kick out?
I can not remember where I read it, from which scriptures, but I can safely that the Lord can tolerate whatever things said about him, Good or bad, but he can't tolerate what is being said about his devotees.
So, I would be very careful, before things are said about vibshan, surgiva etc.
Remember to pray for forgiveness by saying Shri Ram.
Another point, IF Shri Ram asked his devotees "what do you want me to do about this person who has insulted you?" Do you know what the true devotees would say "Forgive them, prabhu, they are a part of you" because they understand that we have manifested from Him alone. That is why the Lord keeps them to his side. To be even a dear Friend of the Lord requires millions of merits from lot's of briths. So just imagine what category people like Vibshan and surgiva are.....
This is what Parlada did.
Originally posted by: godisone
And I also agree that people have freedom of speech, but how far does that go when regarding the Lord? Do people really have freedom of speech to say what they like about God?
Originally posted by: its me tan
r the people actually talking against the Lord?let people discuss what they want, at the end of the day its your faith and it depends on you onlyand i did not take offense in your post coz you were trying to point out something which you did not likebut i did take offense in a particular sentence, i did not like it and i honely did not expect that sentence coming form youelse i am fine with ur topic, i am open for all sorts of discussions people do and i just want all sorts of discussions to happen, that only will make interactions better.