Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Love CC#10/DT Nt Pg#41 - Page 43

Originally posted by: stormborn

She said dada....matlab grandfather

.....inka level hi kuchh alag hai behen.....

pardada banke bhi radha ke saath rashleela manayega aur krishna kaveri narmada pata nehi kaunsi kaunsi shaadiya karta rahega

Krishnaa?🤣

Originally posted by: stormborn

Really lol !!

Though I really enjoyed the show before krishna's marriage proposal started the destruction. And then after Ugrapad and Vrishavan made the dealing of Radha as a sack of potatoes while Krisna acted as a middleman in the bazaar, everything got ruined.

I would have preferred if Radha became the villain Bahu i.e. If she married Ayan with the intention of destroying the Ugrapada family.

Originally posted by: vyapti

Krishnaa?🤣

Yah. Their jodi name would also be krish-naa 😉

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

I'm guessing they're not going to show what Vyasa wrote. That she was raped by Balam. Krishna then married her.

At least better than Lakshmana who was turned into a vamp.

These poor women get no justice after their deaths, either.

You really think they will even have slightest of idea that this is written in the texts?

Mahabharata to they got anything ye Harivanshpuranam that too something not directly mentioned but is hidden and implied dikhaayenge

Plus inka to Balram comedy k siwa kuchh nhi karta hai

But pata nhi marriage ka koi reason to Hona chahiye warna ye Amar premi kisi aur se kyu shaadi karega

Originally posted by: stormborn

Yah. Their jodi name would also be krish-naa 😉

Swastik Krishna can be named Krish-Naa.

Krish=Short form of Krishna

Naa=No/Not/Negation

Swastik Krishna=Opposite of Krishna.

The best scene was when Rukmini says that aap(Krishna), main aur Radha hum teenon ek saath rahenge, and Krishna bas teenon😀😀😀😀

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

The best scene was when Rukmini says that aap(Krishna), main aur Radha hum teenon ek saath rahenge, and Krishna bas teenon😀😀😀😀

Did he really say that? 😂 The funniest part is Rukmini is nowhere to be seen, poor jambhavati had to turn negative and satyabhama is almost as if she has put on the mr.india watch that's why no one can see her. 😂 It's just Radha, Radha and Radha in Dwarka now.

Originally posted by: stormborn

Behen yeh toh MB tak thik tarah se pareh nehi aur aap kahan kahan se rarely known scriptures laa rahe hai.....

Those kind of things need one to be properly educated and well researched about the ancient scriptures. All that these makers know is to show vastraharan-rashleela-marriage in an infinite loop.

Yeah. But they certainly know about Lakshmana. What they did to her character is unforgivable. Posthumous character rape.

Originally posted by: vyapti

Even Vyasa wrote/had to write that metaphorically.

If the cvs show that then lawsuits shall be filed against them.

That is prob true. Really, reading the epics and analyzing should be part of K12 education, but I doubt even teachers would dare call it what it was. Violent rape.

Originally posted by: Life_Is_Dutiful

I don't think they will show that because I don't think the writers have even read any of the puranas. They're busy creating their own puraan.

Prob is these same fangirls will be on Quora in a couple of years, arguing Radha lived in Dwaraka.

After Swastik MBH and SPK, some crazy chick on Quora claimed Panchali and Karna had an affair and produced a son called Drokarna😆