Sleet Of Emotional Quivers On RadhaKrishn Eternal Love-CC #3 - Page 112

Caught up finally and my thoughts are on the objective side now.

Can I be sadist and say that am glad kanha too suffered?? Pls allow me this one time to say this because this whole perception of our so called writers to make Radha listen to her instinct and her inner self was hogwash!! This rachna of God could have been so much better.

How is it that you make someone realize to her instinct or inner self by proving her wrong in front of everyone, by making her feel guilty, by making her feel low?? Was not there any other perception or story to make a pure soul realize that she is not listening to her inner self?????

She did right by moving away, she did right by thinking she is inferior because to do something good the God himself made her feel low! He corrected her mistake in front of everyone!!

It is so natural to think that whatever kanha says is right, whatever he does he does it with thorough thought, infact he was also thoughtful and thorough in removing her badhas!! Did he ever try to tell her why? Then why will she not think the way she did as she is completely purely human after all!!

So this track had two purpose - to make one realize that no matter what always trust your instinct and to make Radha completely pure and start her journey towards become the Radha whom the world worshipped and started taking her name before Kanha!

Boy I so wish they (the CVs) had perceived this differently!!

And for the first time I will actually give credits for the 30th April episode!! We cannot call Radha stubborn in this episode. If we see the situation she was in and how things moved, her feelings, her questions were all so apt and in place 👏 👏

In the krishnavani it was said that burai se burai ko mara nahin ja sakta, then my biggest question is how can you remove jealousy by invoking jealousy and how can you make someone realize their worth by making them feel low???

Kya perception hai CVs?????? :) :)

Originally posted by: RainFire125

Caught up finally and my thoughts are on the objective side now.

Can I be sadist and say that am glad kanha too suffered?? Pls allow me this one time to say this because this whole perception of our so called writers to make Radha listen to her instinct and her inner self was hogwash!! This rachna of God could have been so much better.

How is it that you make someone realize to her instinct or inner self by proving her wrong in front of everyone, by making her feel guilty, by making her feel low?? Was not there any other perception or story to make a pure soul realize that she is not listening to her inner self?????

She did right by moving away, she did right by thinking she is inferior because to do something good the God himself made her feel low! He corrected her mistake in front of everyone!!

It is so natural to think that whatever kanha says is right, whatever he does he does it with thorough thought, infact he was also thoughtful and thorough in removing her badhas!! Did he ever try to tell her why? Then why will she not think the way she did as she is completely purely human after all!!

So this track had two purpose - to make one realize that no matter what always trust your instinct and to make Radha completely pure and start her journey towards become the Radha whom the world worshipped and started taking her name before Kanha!

Boy I so wish they (the CVs) had perceived this differently!!

I think Gayatri it's a matter of perception. Some people will use reverse psychology to make themselves understood, others will try to reason with the person. Except it has been shown that Radha does not understand when you try to make her understand, so Krishna only does reverse psychology with her. But he too loves mysteries too much. He has never been direct, he takes turns, so it is normal that Radha's spirit of contradiction does not perceive things as they should be.

After saying that he deserves to suffer, yes and no.

Yes, because after all, as Balram said, it was he who allowed this injustice to Radha. So it is normal for him to suffer from the situation at first, to feel the emptiness and remember everything. But he says that's love too. He has his periods of "weakness", but on the other hand he only sees the final result.

No, because after that he will concentrate on his mission and it will be up to Radha to bear the burden of the separation alone. After Krishna will always be surrounded, but he will also feel the emptiness, but me as Radha (after that it's my way of seeing things).

Throughout history, the one who is most affected is Radha. What I reproach is that they didn't make it evolve, but now that they have definitively eliminated the 5 badha let's see how she will react now.

Originally posted by: ReadLo

I think Gayatri it's a matter of perception. Some people will use reverse psychology to make themselves understood, others will try to reason with the person. Except it has been shown that Radha does not understand when you try to make her understand, so Krishna only does reverse psychology with her. But he too loves mysteries too much. He has never been direct, he takes turns, so it is normal that Radha's spirit of contradiction does not perceive things as they should be.

After saying that he deserves to suffer, yes and no.

Yes, because after all, as Balram said, it was he who allowed this injustice to Radha. So it is normal for him to suffer from the situation at first, to feel the emptiness and remember everything. But he says that's love too. He has his periods of "weakness", but on the other hand he only sees the final result.

No, because after that he will concentrate on his mission and it will be up to Radha to bear the burden of the separation alone. After Krishna will always be surrounded, but he will also feel the emptiness, but me as Radha (after that it's my way of seeing things).

Throughout history, the one who is most affected is Radha. What I reproach is that they didn't make it evolve, but now that they have definitively eliminated the 5 badha let's see how she will react now.

Agreed that reverse psychology is one of the methods to teach something to a person however it's one of the most difficult method that needs to be employed with care as it can have adverse effects. As adverse as suicide. So in that context I would say that her reactions were perfect. By using this methods on her she was very low on her self esteem and that made her not listen to any reason and she wanted to leave. Which is again very logical. If it gets in your head that you are not worry for that person any reasoning does not work at that moment and that too if you try and tell that the person is an epitome of love. So what they showed as her reaction was right.

A very good discussion between Gayatri and Cynthia.👏 You both touched each and every point which is evoking many questions in the minds of the viewers. By keeping her ignorant from her Divinity, keeping her in confusion and every now and then making her more human with many fallacies and most importantly Krishna hiding his divinity and power from Radha while killing the demons and devils, provoking her when she was in anger, invoking all her weaknesses to reach it's higher level only to eliminate it from her in the later stage after her suffering in it, what type of divinity it is?

The Arthanariswar roop won't rightly fit in this context, because --

The male half stands for Purusha and the female half is Prakriti. Ardhanareeshvara harmonizes the two conflicting ways of life: The spiritual way of the ascetic as represented by Shiva, and the materialistic way of the world symbolized by Parvati. It conveys that Shiva and Shakti are one and the same. Ardhanareeshvara symbolizes male and female principles cannot be separated, the concept of “Ardhanareeshwara” as it aspires to resolve the paradox of opposites into a unity, not by negation, but through positive experiences of life. The matching of opposites produces the true rhythm of life!

Here, Krishna and Radha are not different, they are one in love, love is the binding factor as well as the main essence of their being. To magnify the importance of love, the cvs brought this thought Arthanariswar, but they lost the main essence of love here, here there is no Purush and Prakriti, both are an important part of Prakriti, with their divinity, with their godliness, they defined, developed and dissolved themselves in that Divine Love as Eternal One!

Originally posted by: RainFire125

Caught up finally and my thoughts are on the objective side now.

Can I be sadist and say that am glad kanha too suffered?? Pls allow me this one time to say this because this whole perception of our so called writers to make Radha listen to her instinct and her inner self was hogwash!! This rachna of God could have been so much better.

How is it that you make someone realize to her instinct or inner self by proving her wrong in front of everyone, by making her feel guilty, by making her feel low?? Was not there any other perception or story to make a pure soul realize that she is not listening to her inner self?????

She did right by moving away, she did right by thinking she is inferior because to do something good the God himself made her feel low! He corrected her mistake in front of everyone!!

It is so natural to think that whatever kanha says is right, whatever he does he does it with thorough thought, infact he was also thoughtful and thorough in removing her badhas!! Did he ever try to tell her why? Then why will she not think the way she did as she is completely purely human after all!!

So this track had two purpose - to make one realize that no matter what always trust your instinct and to make Radha completely pure and start her journey towards become the Radha whom the world worshipped and started taking her name before Kanha!

Boy I so wish they (the CVs) had perceived this differently!!

As far as I know, Krishna loved his Radha with adoration, never tried to search for vikars or badhas in her , and as far as he was in Brindavan, spent every minute blissfully with her and with each and every Brindavan Wasi. CVS presenting this story from a different angle, making Radha with all sorts of fallacies, and making Krishna a preacher and teacher only to her , only for her, which is not convincingly correct.

Suta❤️ please prepare a new nest for us to chirp/ chat every now and then with stirred emotions!🤗

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Agree with your opinion Gayatri, esp the Bold words. 🤗

As far as I know, Krishna loved his Radha with adoration, never tried to search for vikars or badhas in her , and as far as he was in Brindavan, spent every minute blissfully with her and with each and every Brindavan Wasi. CVS presenting this story from a different angle, making Radha with all sorts of fallacies, and making Krishna a preacher and teacher only to her , only for her, which is not convincingly correct.

Especially the method M ... I dont at all go along with this kind of a method... this is not how you can get through a person whom you adore as you say. For that matter am glad that to all her questions kanha really did not have an answer. Atleast as per the plot the CVs got the dialog right.

Originally posted by: RainFire125

Agreed that reverse psychology is one of the methods to teach something to a person however it's one of the most difficult method that needs to be employed with care as it can have adverse effects. As adverse as suicide. So in that context I would say that her reactions were perfect. By using this methods on her she was very low on her self esteem and that made her not listen to any reason and she wanted to leave. Which is again very logical. If it gets in your head that you are not worry for that person any reasoning does not work at that moment and that too if you try and tell that the person is an epitome of love. So what they showed as her reaction was right.

Yes, Radha's reactions were very accurate. That's why I said it awakened his spirit of contradiction. It's not easy to do reverse psychology. The person receiving it must be receptive and this is not always the case.

Radha, despite some aspects, has always been someone who follows the stream flow, so we could never have seen her understand anything about Krishna because of the way he tries to learn things.

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Agree with your opinion Gayatri, esp the Bold words. 🤗

As far as I know, Krishna loved his Radha with adoration, never tried to search for vikars or badhas in her , and as far as he was in Brindavan, spent every minute blissfully with her and with each and every Brindavan Wasi. CVS presenting this story from a different angle, making Radha with all sorts of fallacies, and making Krishna a preacher and teacher only to her , only for her, which is not convincingly correct.

That's why I said Krishna teaches through her. I posted it in the other discussion

"Let me explain. Krishna is the one who wrote this, so he holds all the cards, Radha completes it, it has been shown several times that he often does all the things on his side, and that Radha is just a spectator and gets to the point he expects from her. She completes the lines and Krishna puts the finishing touches..."