Originally posted by: sukhminderkaur7
not agree,puting a sindhoor in fore head & consumate is not considered a marriage in the eyes of law even our hindu law,high courts & even supreme court of india emphasize on ceremonial marriage in the pressence of witnesses,so in my point of view sahiba & daljeet's marriage is not a valid marriage in the eyes of law..so whether daljeet has signed divorce papers or not is immaterial...but on the other hand though ranveer force sahiba to marry & she give her consent & their marriage was a ceremonial marriage...by performing anand karaj & in the pressence of his & her family members...so marriage of ranveer & sahiba is a valid marriage legally.
looked like you forgot that they signed the marriage papers in front of francise and the advocate alongside witnesses before going tolondon in search of ranveer . so , isnt that legal ?