Can a persons bad actions be justified ?

kriti07 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#1
Can Akaashs actions be sympathised or emphathised with time over and over again just because he had 30 years of impoverished life that he was denied his basic name and rights.

Then every criminal also has a BG story and commits crimes and he needs to be sympathised with and his actions defended.

I agree Akaash was denied lots of things due to Radhas action but still his bad actions and behaviour can never be justified when all the entire faimly tried bringing him into the family fold.

Created

Last reply

Replies

10

Views

3.1k

Users

10

Likes

17

Frequent Posters

jyoti06 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Master Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 12 years ago
#2
A person can hv bad history but that does not mean his inhuman acts will b given forgiveness in the name of his so called past history .. Every person who commits a murder or rape or extortion hv a bad history in their childhood because no person is born evil ... so if law starts sympathising with all because of their past history , then the world will b filled with criminals only ...

Akash might hv a unfair past but that does not give him the right to do inhuman acts like what he did in hospital with Gayatri on her death bed

He needs to redeem himself and only then I can sympathise with him
maha9 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#3
not at all dear. if he try to be good then there is a chance
Chitra_11 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: jyoti06

A person can hv bad history but that does not mean his inhuman acts will b given forgiveness in the name of his so called past history .. Every person who commits a murder or rape or extortion hv a bad history in their childhood because no person is born evil ... so if law starts sympathising with all because of their past history , then the world will b filled with criminals only ...

Akash might hv a unfair past but that does not give him the right to do inhuman acts like what he did in hospital with Gayatri on her death bed

He needs to redeem himself and only then I can sympathise with him




Well said Jyo👏
nusratjahan505 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#5
Sometimes bad action can be justified which is the product of situation but not bad intention to destroy others happiness in the name of revenge.
gafulu14 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Commentator Level 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#6
well said , same way ish has to understand too, she does not have bad past but still she is playing bad n usker sky by talking bad about situation
ann5 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#7
exactly, his behaviour can never be justified...he will be hurt yes but demanding all these conditions and being so irrational can never be right...if radha's character as being portrayed as a humble good mother, then these are the values that she has tried i am sure to instill in akaash as any mother will instill in their children...so no his actions can and never be justified...
1HappyGrl thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#8
Nice question. We may certainly understand why Akash behaves the way he does, sympathize with him on some level, and be able to explain why he does what he does. But, IA, understanding him and being able to explain his behavior/choices does not and cannot absolve or excuse the way he behaves/the choices he makes. He's still accountable for the way he handles his anger and pain, no matter how much we may understand what's motivating him.
Edited by 1HappyGrl - 12 years ago
gmhatcher thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#9
I'm going to take the less traveled route and say "yes" every person can garner sympathy and empathy for their actions, however sympathizing and empathizing does not absolve one of wrong doing.
I can understand hardships that someone has faced in life but that doesn't mean that that person should not be held accountable.
Aakash had a rough childhood (got it, feel bad for Aakash the child). That doesn't mean that Aakash the adult is off the hook for bad behavior. Unless he has a mental deficiency that makes him unable to distinguish right from wrong ( in which he case he shouldn't be allowed to roam free), everything that Aakash the Adult has done from pushing G3 to following Ishika's bad advice belongs squarely in Aakash's lap. He's an adult and needs to begin to act like one. If this is how he really thinks people with money act and he thinks that a bank account makes it okay to behave this way he really needs to grow up. If Aakash were written in a way that allowed for him to sympathize and empathize there would be no show.
In some strange way I think Aarti and Yash are just as reckless with their big heartedness as Aakash is confused about what he really wants.
See I just sympathized with everyone but they all need to "straighten up and fly right".
Edited by gmhatcher - 12 years ago
gmhatcher thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#10
Sorry got side tracked...answers still "yes" Jean Val Jean stole a loaf of bread (stealing bad) to feed his starving niece and was hounded for it for over 1500 pages. But feeding his niece using any means necessary right.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".