Suryavanshi Rajputs??? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

33

Views

13.8k

Users

9

Likes

3

Frequent Posters

islandboy401 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: vidushi ?


hey kshatriyas n rajputs is same thing



Actually, no.........it isn't the same thing..................

The word "Kshatriya" refers to the warrior clan.......................

It is one of the four hindu clans.....................

The Kshatriya clan has three subdivisions:

1. Suryavanshi (Descendants of the sun)
2. Chandravanshi (Descendants of the moon)
3. Agnivanshi, or Rajputs (Descendants of fire)

Thus, a Rajput is a subdivision of the Kshatriya clan.............however...........they are not the same thing...........The word "Kshatriya" can refer to any of the three subdivisions...........while the word "Rajput" can only refer to the Agnivansh...
Edited by islandboy401 - 17 years ago
256747 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#22
Ya well.. I am a Suryavanshi Rajput.. DUNNO what that means 😕 😕 ..but,that is what I am
Aanchu.. thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#23
i am also a rajput look what i found
Bhatia LITERALLY Means Blood / Son of Bhati's/Bhatti's


The Bhatias are Bhati (or Bhatti) comprised mainly of Kshatriya or warrior clans and are believed to have originated from the Jaisalmer area of Rajasthan. Due to continuous war with the Mughals and severe drought in the region, almost all the Bhatias emigrated with their animals and families settling down in places such as Kutch, Hyderabad, Thatta, Nasarpur etc. Bhatias started adopting the local language and culture and were in the long run identified as Kutchi Bhatias, Punjabi Bhatias etc.

In 1947, with the onset of Partition, numerous Bhatias left the newly formed Islamic Republic of Pakistan to settle down in the Republic of India. It may be noted that most of the Bhatias are found in the states surrounding Rajasthan, in Kutch/Sindh in the West, Punjab in the North, and Madhya Pradesh in the East and also the capital of India (New Delhi).

cool na
akhl thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#24
Such topics interest me a lot. 😊
The descendants of Ram are also descendants of Surya because Ram was a descendant of Surya i.e. Vivasvan (Sun god).
vidu♥rt thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: islandboy401



Actually, no.........it isn't the same thing..................

The word "Kshatriya" refers to the warrior clan.......................

It is one of the four hindu clans.....................

The Kshatriya clan has three subdivisions:

1. Suryavanshi (Descendants of the sun)
2. Chandravanshi (Descendants of the moon)
3. Agnivanshi, or Rajputs (Descendants of fire)

Thus, a Rajput is a subdivision of the Kshatriya clan.............however...........they are not the same thing...........The word "Kshatriya" can refer to any of the three subdivisions...........while the word "Rajput" can only refer to the Agnivansh...


so wat
v blong 2 same family
dont v😉
akhl thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#26
Some members here have written that they are Suryavanshis. Let me say something more about them.😊
All people in the world have descended from one of the following sages: -
Marichi, Atri, Angira, Pulastya, Pulah, Kratu, Bhrigu, Vashishth, Daksh, Kardam.

Suryavanshis have descended from Marichi.
akhl thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: monu1101

Suryavanshi's are also believed to be descendants of Lord Rama.



Monu,
Descendants of Lord Rama are Suryavanshis. But it is not necessary that all Suryavanshis are the descendants of Lord Rama.
To give an example, the descendants of Shatrughna(Rama's brother) are also Suryavanshis.
Edited by akhl - 17 years ago
islandboy401 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: akhl



Monu,
Descendants of Lord Rama are Suryavanshis. But it is not necessary that all Suryavanshis are the descendants of Lord Rama.
To give an example, the descendants of Shatrughna(Rama's brother) are also Suryavanshis.



Yup, that is 101% true....................Suryavanshis can be descendants of any of the four brothers....

lol..........this gets even better.............

Ram and all his brothers had two sons each.........so that's eight sons..........so.....a suryavanshi can be a descendant of any of those 8.......lol.........it gets really complex........

avi, do the scriptures mention anything about the origin of "suryavanshi rajputs".......or the reasoning behind how that name was derived...


Edited by islandboy401 - 17 years ago
islandboy401 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: vidushi ?


so wat
v blong 2 same family
dont v😉



yes, we do😛
Edited by islandboy401 - 17 years ago
akhl thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#30

Originally posted by: islandboy401

Ram and all his brothers had two sons each.........so that's eight sons..........so.....a suryavanshi can be a descendant of any of those 8.......lol.........it gets really complex........[/quote]
Not only from these eight. Suryavanshis are the descendants of Surya. The children of Ram, Bharat, Laxman, Shatrughan are not the only descendants of Surya; there are more. Rama came many generations after Surya. If we consider the generation tree with root at Surya, then one branch of this tree connects Dashrath to Surya. There may be other branches as well.


You are saying that agnivanshi khatriyas are called as rajputs. Vidushi is saying that kshatriya and rajput mean the same thing.
Actually, it is correct that agnivanshi khatriyas are called as rajputs by some groups. It is also correct that the words kshatriya and rajput mean the same thing. You may wonder how it is possible when we know that there are suryavanshi and chandravanshi kshatriyas as well. The answer lies in the phrase "by some groups" that I have put in bold.
Consider the word rajput. It is modified form of rajaputra, which means "son of a king". In those days, sons of kings were also (in most of cases) warriors. And we know that kshatriya means warrior class. Therefore, rajput means kshatriya. There are some groups who believe that all kshatriyas at present are from agni. For them, kshatriya means agnivanshis. In other words, for them, rajput means agnivanshis.
Why do they believe that all kshatriyas are agnivanshis? This is because of the story, which says that Parshuram killed kshatriyas. There is a story, which says that sage Vashishth did a fire sacrifice. As a result, a youth came out of the fire. All kshatriyas i.e. rajputs after that descended from that youth.
The belief that all rajputs at present are from agni has become so prevalent that many think it to be true. In fact, there are many people who believe that rajput means agnivanshi even thought they are not aware why exactly rajput means agnivanshi. At the start, only those who believed that all kshatriyas are agnivanshis called rajputs as agnivanshi.
The belief that all rajputs are agnivanshis spreaded but the belief that all kshatriyas are agnivanshis did not spread that much even though people who spreaded these beliefs considered kshatriya = rajput. This is why, at present, there are people who believe that there are non-agnivanshi kshatriyas and the same people also believe that there are only agnivanshi rajputs.
Now, let us go back to the story of Parshuram killing all kshatriyas. As per scriptures, it is a wrong concept. Parshuram did not kill all kshatriyas. When Parshuram rid Earth of kshatriyas 21 times, then he spared Ikshvaku vanshis because his mother was very closely related to Ikshvaku clan. Therefore, it is wrong belief that Parshuram killed all kshatriyas and the belief that all rajputs are agnivanshis is based on this wrong belief.
Ikshvaku himself was a suryavanshi. Ikshvaku's father was Vaivasvat Manu and Vaivasvat Manu's father was Vivasvan(i.e. Surya or Sun god).

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".