He says that the Prithviraj Raso is fake????.....and that it doesn't provide us with the accurate story about prithviraj chauhan.............
Weird guy.........š
I PMed him back, and asked him what sources he considers to be legit...........
And I asked, "how can you prove them to be more significant than a primary source.........cuz we gotta admit.........the raso is the most direct account of prc's life.........the other historical records are merely interpretations and assumptions"...
What do you guys think???