is this karma? - Page 10

n another leader "da maharaja of kashmir" (being a hindu) handed over kashmir to india althought kashmir was a muslim majority area ??
according to cabinet mission plan.. which formed the basis of partition "The princely states of India would be permitted to accede to either dominion or attain independence."
Maharaja of kashmir initially did not want to join pakistan or india... so pakistan send their army to kashmir.. maharaja found he cld not resis the army.. so he asked india help.. India agreed to help if kashmir agrees to join india (rt decision.. why shld v worry abt other countries.. v have to develop india first). so kashmir becomes a state of india.. n indian army drives away pak army. but when only a part of kashmir was recovered UNcame in between n asked for ceasefire... the Un declaration was : Pakistan army shld first leave kashmir.. then indian army.. then people of kashmir can decide their future... n in all these 60 yrs.. pakistan did not leave control of POK.. so India never left control of remaining kashmir.. so so the people never got change to decide for themselves...

n iv u say dat hindus didnt take away d rights of muslims den y did dey widheld muslims share of 75 crores when dey knew dat r needs were really pressing at dat tyme n v desperately needed financial aid ??

ok.. when britan left india.. it divided the aseets based on the size of both countries created. n pakistan was supposed to get 75 crores.. now after partition as u said.. pakistan was in desp need of financial aid.. i agree to that.. but do u know what the desp reason was : it wanted to attack india (kashmir became part of india at that time). Now pls... do u consider us such fools that v give u money to help u attack us 😆 😆 ....
if u had continued with developing ur country instead of creating trouble for us.. v wld have gladly given u ur share.. but since it was a war.. which u guys started.. v were ready to do anything that wld help us win war.. n defeat u.. 😉

any more points sabika..

dont use wikipedia as a source for anything...the historian will shoot you down in your argument!

Originally posted by: miraclemun

dont use wikipedia as a source for anything...the historian will shoot you down in your argument!

means??...is it not good to use wiklipedia??....i found dis info ........so i posted it...!...tell me clearly....shud i delete dose links??

Originally posted by: anuradhasharma

means??...is it not good to use wiklipedia??....i found dis info ........so i posted it...!...tell me clearly....shud i delete dose links??

Dont delete anything...it just looks bad in a professional setting...I dont use wikipedia....I use other data bases for my research...its more reliable to not use wikipedia.

Originally posted by: miraclemun

Dont delete anything...it just looks bad in a professional setting...I dont use wikipedia....I use other data bases for my research...its more reliable to not use wikipedia.

thanks yaar !...i neverr knew dat!....dere r many other sites also...but i prefered wid wiklipidia...coz it was the first site to open...so i didnt wasted my time to search more !😆

Originally posted by: lakshmim_84

n another leader "da maharaja of kashmir" (being a hindu) handed over kashmir to india althought kashmir was a muslim majority area ??
according to cabinet mission plan.. which formed the basis of partition "The princely states of India would be permitted to accede to either dominion or attain independence."
Maharaja of kashmir initially did not want to join pakistan or india... so pakistan send their army to kashmir.. maharaja found he cld not resis the army.. so he asked india help.. India agreed to help if kashmir agrees to join india (rt decision.. why shld v worry abt other countries.. v have to develop india first). so kashmir becomes a state of india.. n indian army drives away pak army. but when only a part of kashmir was recovered UNcame in between n asked for ceasefire... the Un declaration was : Pakistan army shld first leave kashmir.. then indian army.. then people of kashmir can decide their future... n in all these 60 yrs.. pakistan did not leave control of POK.. so Indian never left control of remaining kashmir.. so so the people never got change to decide for themselves...

u r wrong gurll w88 read it...

when the sub continent was divided,the state was ruled by mahraja hari singh who was a tyrannical ruler.the people ov kashmir,at the tyme ov partition,felt that in view ov muslim majority population,the state ruler would accede to pakistan they would soon be out ov the clutches ov the oppressive dogra rule.but the hindu ruler didnt want to accede to pakistan.infact he wanted to accede to india inspite ov all the factors favouring state's accession to pak. soo a large scale muslim massacre was planned to turn the muslim majority into minority.

Originally posted by: luv4prc

u r wrong gurll w88 read it...

when the sub continent was divided,the state was ruled by mahraja hari singh who was a tyrannical ruler.the people ov kashmir,at the tyme ov partition,felt that in view ov muslim majority population,the state ruler would accede to pakistan they would soon be out ov the clutches ov the oppressive dogra rule.but the hindu ruler didnt want to accede to pakistan.infact he wanted to accede to india inspite ov all the factors favouring state's accession to pak. soo a large scale muslim massacre was planned to turn the muslim majority into minority.

🤣...is it also written in ur textbooks??

Originally posted by: luv4prc

u r wrong gurll w88 read it...

when the sub continent was divided,the state was ruled by mahraja hari singh who was a tyrannical ruler.the people ov kashmir,at the tyme ov partition,felt that in view ov muslim majority population,the state ruler would accede to pakistan they would soon be out ov the clutches ov the oppressive dogra rule.but the hindu ruler didnt want to accede to pakistan.infact he wanted to accede to india inspite ov all the factors favouring state's accession to pak. soo a large scale muslim massacre was planned to turn the muslim majority into minority.

Miss Sabika,

actually kashmir was going to be an independent nation. However, guirillas and pakistani army men from pakistan came and tried to take over kashmir...this is why hari singh had to ask for india's help...in order to get help they had to sign the accord of accession...this is the only way they could have gotten military aid from india because kashmir was not part of india then....so kashmir is a legitimate part of india, and there is proof....pakistan however violated international standards and attacked a foreign territory...have you read the accord of accession? it clearly says these things...and it made kashmir an integral part of india...

and what massacre are you talking about?

Originally posted by: luv4prc

u r wrong gurll w88 read it...

when the sub continent was divided,the state was ruled by mahraja hari singh who was a tyrannical ruler.the people ov kashmir,at the tyme ov partition,felt that in view ov muslim majority population,the state ruler would accede to pakistan they would soon be out ov the clutches ov the oppressive dogra rule.but the hindu ruler didnt want to accede to pakistan.infact he wanted to accede to india inspite ov all the factors favouring state's accession to pak. soo a large scale muslim massacre was planned to turn the muslim majority into minority.

mahraja hari singh who was a tyrannical ruler : In what way.. pls elaborate
ut the hindu ruler didnt want to accede to pakistan.infact he wanted to accede to india : then why did he not accede to india till pakistan army entered kashmir.. he himself declared to britishers that he wanted to remain independent.
nspite ov all the factors favouring state's accession to pak : the cabinet mission plan which was agreed by both pakistan n indian leaders only takes into account the decision of the king of that province.. if u wanted the wishes of people to be taken also.. then why didn't u oppose to it.
soo a large scale muslim massacre was planned to turn the muslim majority into minority : really.. pls give me some neutral link which supports ur claim.
even with all this india agreed to the UN declaration that said the wishes of people should be taken into account. n stopped her army from going further.. But as i said the above post.. pakistan did not withdraw her control from POk which was the first requirement of Un... so people were never given a choice.. now who did mistake here