Rajaputra - origin and evolution

RatiG thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 17 years ago
#1

In the earliest Indian text (the Rig Veda dating back several millennia) the word jan refers to a tribe/people while the ruler or protector of that tribe is called the Ra-jan. The Rajan's wife is called the Rajani and his brothers, cousins, and nephews are called Rajanyas (also pronounced Rajanka). These Rajanyas provided the armed strength to protect the jan while the Rajan was their leader in war and an administrator/judge in times of peace.

In later times Rajan evolved into Raja (King), Rajani into Rani (Queen), and Rajanya into Rana (chieftain). Such changes were of course more immediate in the spoken languages like
Prakrit or Apabhramsa and slower in the classical language of Sanskrit. As an illustration, the Pratihar clan have recorded an inscription near modern Jodhpur (dated 837 CE), which refers to their queen as the Maharajni (great queen)…this rajni would be an Apabhramsa word from the original Sanskrit rajani. A second example, this time from the east, will further illustrate this process of word evolution. The Bhanja dynasty in Orissa issued copper-plate grants in the 9th Century that mention princes with the title of Ranak…again an Apabhramsa word between the Rajanka[1] of ancient times and the Rana of a later age[2].

As populations grew and tribal territories expanded into monarchies, the Rajanyas must have become landowners/rulers in their own right with the word Rana becoming a hereditary title. And when these Rajanyas became chieftains another word was needed for the mass of ordinary soldiers and nobles who were not chiefs—this new word was Kshatriya or warrior
[3]. It is in this later Vedic age that we read for the first time of the word Rajaputra (the Raja's son).

This is the right place to mention the historical personalities associated with the word Rajaputra. The famous founder of Buddhism, Siddharth, was a prince who left his family to contemplate the meaning of life. Since he never returned to become king after his father's death, he was always called Rajaputra Siddharth in all Buddhist texts. This was in the 7th Century BCE—more than eighteen centuries before the Turk-Rajput wars!

The second historic personality is Harshvardhan, the younger brother of Rajyavardhan, in the Kingdom of Thanesar. The elder brother became ruler of Kannauj in the 7th Century CE while Harshvardhan, as the junior prince, was called the Rajaputra Siladitya. Even after becoming king Harsh continued with the designation of Rajaputra until his position on the throne was secure...all this happened 600 years before the Turk-Rajput wars.


The break-up of the Maurya Empire in northwest India and the intrusion of foreign powers like the Yavans, Sakas, and Kushans, led to some interesting changes in the use of titles, which is described in this post.

Created

Last reply

Replies

18

Views

2.3k

Users

6

Likes

2

Frequent Posters

RatiG thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 17 years ago
#2
So while the big powers began using high-sounding titles, this also had its impact on the clan-states that were subject them (or resisted them). The map displays the location of these clans (all in small fonts) against the major powers (in big fonts)...as can be seen clearly they are mostly located in the western and northern parts of India while the northwest is under foreign rule.
This is beautiful silver coin of the Kuninda warrior clan, located in modern Himachal Pradesh. The legend in Prakrit (Brahmi script): "Rajnah Kunindasya Amoghabhutisya Maharajasya". Amoghabhuti was the ruler of the Kuninda warrior clan, and had taken the high-sounding personal title of Maharaja. However he continued with his traditional rank of being the head of the clan...which is Rajan. His leading clansmen would've been called Rajanyas, which as we know evolved into the title of Rana in the plains.

But in the Himalayan territories, where these republics survived for a longer period than in the plains, Rana has been preserved as a surname for a section of the Rajput population from Himachal to Nepal.


Land ownership

When discussing warriors and wars it is important to also understand the economics of war, particularly related to the changing ideas of land usage and ownership. In the republican age of the Rajan and his Rajanyas land was owned and protected by the entire community. In the age of monarchies and empires, land was privately owned but there was still a centrally organized government that could re-assign such land to others.
bhuvana3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#3
Lot of interesting info ratika...Thanks for sharing 😛
256747 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#4
Thnx! Did not know this 😊
chaitra86 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#5
thanks rati 😳 ..

so...is it like "kshatriyas" is more in general and rajputs are from royal family? 😕
256747 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#6
Not all Rajputs' are from Royal or Noble families,Chatty.. But,YES.. ALL Rajputs' are Warriors'!!! 😊
chaitra86 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#7
@tuhi..then who are kshatriyas.. 😕
256747 thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#8
Kshatriyas are a Warrior race,Chatty.. ALL Rajputs are Warriors.. & there-fore,are known as Kshatriyas! But,it is not necessary that all Rajputs' are Royal or Noble.. Infact,most aren't
chaitra86 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: lime ice

Kshatriyas are a Warrior race,Chatty.. ALL Rajputs are Warriors.. & there-fore,are known as Kshatriyas! But,it is not necessary that all Rajputs' are Royal or Noble.. Infact,most aren't

oh..ok thanks😃

prcns thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: lime ice

Kshatriyas are a Warrior race,Chatty.. ALL Rajputs are Warriors.. & there-fore,are known as Kshatriyas! But,it is not necessary that all Rajputs' are Royal or Noble.. Infact,most aren't

but didn't d name rajput came from rajaputra tht was created only to make distinction 4 d ruling clan from all other kshatriyas?😕 thts wht i knew, n thts wht this article also supports.

i had an idea tht 'warriors= kshtriyas', but 'rajputs= kshatriya + royal'. 😕

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".