CHITRAREKHA??? MARRIED PRC? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

33

Views

2.8k

Users

22

Frequent Posters

bezella thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#21
i meant shame ON them......!
miraclemun thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#22
It doesnt matter if he had one wife or 7 wives...and even if he did have 7 wives, the sagars can choose not to show them at all...this is because he is famous for marrying sanyo...so they kept that track....even when you watch mahabharat the chopras dont show you all of shri krishna's wives, only rukmani.....and arjun also had many wives, but they only showed 2 of his wives....

personally, i dont think the sagars will even mention anyone except for sanyo as his wife, because if they do show his other wives, the viewers will hate them forver and their trps will go down!

-M Shah
suchasa thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#23
arre yaar imagine if PRC was really lusty and treated women badly do u think he wld have been potrayed in history as illustrous, noble,kind hearted and all

u just refer to any books of history and u will find that anybody who remembers him does so with great honour,he is till day amongst the great patriots of the country

if this person was charecterless and womeniser do u think ppl wld have remeberd him more with his virtousness and patriotism and all.well i dont think so,bcoz although he may have been regarded as a great warrior ppl(historians especially) wld have definitely put forward this aspect of his also.the fact that such crap is available only in some articles online proves it wrong.i am not saying that all th info available online is wrong,BUT PLS GUYS DONT MAKE UR JUDGEMENTS ON SSUCH GREAT PEOPLE JUST BY SOME CRAP INFO THATS AVAILABLE ONLINE



Barbie3143 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#24

womanizer!!!!!!! who shah Jahan!!!!!!!!!!?

are you sure about it???

miraclemun thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#25
Yes miss Barbie3143,

Shah Jahan was a very big womanizer...mumtaz mahal was wife # fourteen...and he had numerous affairs with concubines and court dancers...he also had a an affair with his own daughter...i got this information from the book, Taj Mahal the true story, and it is written by historian P.N. Oak, who reseached about this info all his life...none of this info is from wikipedia...i dont trust wikipedia at all to find historical info.

you can check out the info online if you want and the historian's views

-M SHAH
lakshmim_84 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#26
this is the story if chitrarekha. She was a beautiful dancer from india.. she was kidnapped by muslim invaders n they sold her as a slave to ghori. Ghori's brother hussein started loving her.. n she too liked him. but ghori also started liking her n wanted to marry her so he tried to kill hussein.. they both escaped n took refuge under prc... ghori attacked prc n in that battle hussein dies.. when chitrarekha hears this she commits suicide. they had a son ... ghori pleaded to prithvi to let him have hussein's son.. n promised to look after him.. so prithvi agrees n sends the son to ghori ... but later on prithvi finds ghori is ill treating him... n then he saves the kid from ghori.
nishkala thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: lakshmim_84

this is the story if chitrarekha. She was a beautiful dancer from india.. she was kidnapped by muslim invaders n they sold her as a slave to ghori. Ghori's brother hussein started loving her.. n she too liked him. but ghori also started liking her n wanted to marry her so he tried to kill hussein.. they both escaped n took refuge under prc... ghori attacked prc n in that battle hussein dies.. when chitrarekha hears this she commits suicide. they had a son ... ghori pleaded to prithvi to let him have hussein's son.. n promised to look after him.. so prithvi agrees n sends the son to ghori ... but later on prithvi finds ghori is ill treating him... n then he saves the kid from ghori.


thanks Lakshmi,is this raso version😕
merry911 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: sandeep_skul

No its not true....
by prithvirajraso we know that prithvi loves sayon...
and if we see the books which written at prithvis time then only book is pritvirajraso ....
and if the king is characterless then how he can extend his kingdom and how he got delhi throne ....
i didnt say that prithvi had only one wife .. i think he has more than one wife...

He may had more than one wife but that didn't mean that he was a characterless person. This was a comman pratice then and mainly to have friendly relationship with the neighbouring kingdoms.

I have said that before in prev posts that if Prithvi was such a characterless person to drink and spend most of his time in haram (this word came after muslims arrived) that how could he be able to expend his empire so much.

And then why people praise him so much, I mean the Rajasthani songs on his bravery and immortal love.

This part of history I think is been tempered by the muslim leaders who came to rule Delhi after PRC to degrade him.

merry911 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: suchasa

arre yaar imagine if PRC was really lusty and treated women badly do u think he wld have been potrayed in history as illustrous, noble,kind hearted and all

u just refer to any books of history and u will find that anybody who remembers him does so with great honour,he is till day amongst the great patriots of the country

if this person was charecterless and womeniser do u think ppl wld have remeberd him more with his virtousness and patriotism and all.well i dont think so,bcoz although he may have been regarded as a great warrior ppl(historians especially) wld have definitely put forward this aspect of his also.the fact that such crap is available only in some articles online proves it wrong.i am not saying that all th info available online is wrong,BUT PLS GUYS DONT MAKE UR JUDGEMENTS ON SSUCH GREAT PEOPLE JUST BY SOME CRAP INFO THATS AVAILABLE ONLINE



Very well said.👏Totally agree with you.

NIFT thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#30
Hey not true. PRC was not at all characterless.I also read this article it was from some stupid Pakistanis, not true. do not believe it...

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".