Originally posted by: lashy
😕 rajat doesnt need a mousch or a heavy costume to look 17.. he looks 17...(according to my sources atleast he's turning 16 in july).. and even if rajat isnt turning 16... he is 15 which is not far away from 17.. Wll shraddha, Rajat doznt look like a 16 or 17 yr old to me. Also, Prithvi is 13 or so in the show rite now..played by Rajat who looks like a 16-17 yr old to most of the ppl. So wen the serial takes a leap of 3 yrs wen Prithvi has to be shown as a 17 yr old..then too if Rajat keeps on playing the role it will be difficult to believe that the show has moved on with a leap. How will we believe that Prithvi has grown up? For most of the ppl it'll be the same person with the same looks.
i asked my husband who has never watched the serial, (photos or videos) to just take a guess at the actor's ages.. and he looked at rajat and guessed him to be 17-18 and mugdha to be 20 years old...
ok lets put it this way rajat looks more 17 than angad (or his replacement actor) would do anyday... 😊 I see it this way..itz easy to believe an older person playing tthe role of a younger character than a younger person playing the role of an older character. Most of the ppl still like SRK in a lover boy role in spite of the fact that he has crossed 40.
and as for your other question...
yes i watch this only for rajat-mugdha.😳. got another answer! i am a romantic person by heart😳.. i write romantic stories.. and watch romantic movies.. i get heartbroken when i see sad stories.😭. i was watching it only for these two and will stop when it stops 😭
i dont think the original king PRC was really as great as shown on TV 😕(there are definitely much greater sung/unsung heroes in Indian history) and i dont think the serial is an actual depiction of his life either... so historically it wouldnt make any meaning for me to watch it for information/knowledge purposes.. it would have to be pure entertainment only.. and for me the only entertainment in this serial is these two 😳and his friends 😆 got your answer lashy dear! but i was not pointing out at the knowledge/information point but the understanding of the character.