Interesting!!!! Is it really Moral? - Page 5

Originally posted by: Kai_Hiwatari

Where the hell was 😡 Kai 😡 when this debate was going on. 😡 ...i am always late to Cherry Princess's topic
Hey thks a lot
CherryPrincess 👏
Lashy 👏
Ching 👏
Universe_Megha 👏
Dee7 👏
Anu di (Kashimani) 👏
Sonali13 👏
Jyoti (Jattinder) 👏
Shrishu&Shristi 👏
Prc_Fan2007 👏
Mayuragulati 👏 for ur views 😳

ok...this is wht Kai thinks:
I do agree the path choosen by PRC may not be morally right but if he can achieve his goal this way...y not.
Choosing a straight forward will not yield u success ...then y can't do it the other way around.
That too when the person concerned here Bhimdev...always trys win over PRC by cheating.

In short Tit for tat 😉
One person can't be completly gud..if at all he has to survive 😳
cheers
❤️Kai❤️

agree wid u kai👏

Originally posted by: himmi

agree wid u kai👏

i agree and i believe that the definition of right and wrong, good and bad differ with time and place, ppl. and situations. it's relative. if we think of ramayan and mahabharat where they had set the idealistic behavior and morals for human beings, there too there was a room for debate. whenever i watch ramayan i think "why did the agni pariksha happen?", "why did ramji left sita when he knew she was innocent?" ,"why did lord krishna ask yudhistir to lie?" .. so why do we expect idealistic behavior from PRC? he was a human and a king like all others at tht time.

Originally posted by: mayuragulati

i agree and i believe that the definition of right and wrong, good and bad differ with time and place, ppl. and situations. it's relative. if we think of ramayan and mahabharat where they had set the idealistic behavior and morals for human beings, there too there was a room for debate. whenever i watch ramayan i think "why did the agni pariksha happen?", "why did ramji left sita when he knew she was innocent?" ,"why did lord krishna ask yudhistir to lie?" .. so why do we expect idealistic behavior from PRC? he was a human and a king like all others at tht time.

Hey Mayura, I love ur question.......... If we start on that there would be long really long debate. Even though Ram was considered as the best person ever born on earth, I just couldn't feel peace with the fact that he left sita just by hearing someone doubting her........ i was perfectly fine with agni-pariksha as that was done to prove to others how pavitra she is and he had full confidence in her....... i was happy......... but noone would be ever able to justify why he left her............ 😭And they are our Gods........ So, ofcourse Prithvi's act is really good when he was doing all that to save himself and his country......... Now I am at peace atleast for Prithvi......... 😛 for Ramayana?????? I dont think I would ever in my lifetime would find peace over there...... so I would just try to forget that........... 😕

btw, kai i m happy that u read our entire debate 😛 and reached good conclusion too 😛........ thanks for appreciating comments for my philosophical topics 😛 i m glad u like them 😳

even i want to thank many for giving me mental comfort with ur wonderful answers................... thank you guys.........i really mean it............. 😛

Originally posted by: mayuragulati

i don't feel he is wrong anywhere. how can he be? he's telling the mantri what he'll do next.... he's warned chitrangrao and mantri both but both of them could not stop him. prithvi ne na peeche se vaar kiya na dhoka diya. a fight is not always with talwars. lot of brainwork also go in....it's more of a thinking game i feel n prithvi also says the same.... till date nobody cud defeat prithvi nor physically nor mentally..

so that's not his fault tht chitrangrao is not using his brains..

his mantri told him langde baba cud be prithvi but he's not listening so it's not prithvi's fault..n his only motive here is to scare bheemdev n make him weak.. he will then attack gujrat..

Hei Mayura, I didn't really think it this way.....but thanks to bring it up; I totally agree with you!

So Cherry, you have started a good debate after all.....

Megha, you really contributed to extend the debate and so, we are getting so many more views now!

....what Prithvi's doing may not be justified completely as far as the defination of 'morality' goes.....but, as Mayura said - its a relative word as well....moral or not...depends on the facts that - how is the person and what's his goal!

....This is what we learn from mythologies; and we are seeing that Bhimdev and Prithvi....both are totally different as humans and both have different goals.....so, their acts have no comparisions!

Kai....jaago yaar....current PRC episodes boring hone ka complains chodo, aur aise interesting debates me hissa lo.....kabhi kabhi Anu di ko support ki zarurat hoti hei na 😉

I understand what u mean but i believe in 'eenth ka jawab pathhar se'.......i think bhimdev deserves it!!!!!