Ekta Kapoor reads my post and copies in her Chandrakanta :D - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

49

Views

3.7k

Users

9

Likes

58

Frequent Posters

Neenzm thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#11
Hi guys just watched the colors chandrakanta. I don't know how to describe it. What was that??? Too much ladies drama. I m sure it will be another saas bahu saga. No soothing music like our pyp chandrakanta. Upar se hadh to tab ho gyi (sorry using hindi) jab Virendra ka item song aa gya. Kya hai yeh, kuch bhiii??? Mujhe to lead cast ki acting bhi zyada achi nhi lagi. No offences. This ck matches no where with life ok chandrakanta
NandiniRaizadaa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#12
Its a totally Ekta Kapoor typical Mama's boy hero type show
It has nothing to do with the novel really and has that age old typical Ekta storyline which she has shown in shows like Naagin etc

Evil Witch and Hero's step mother kills Heroine's mother and heroine needs to avenge her mother. Hero is devoted to his step mother and does what she says. However he falls in love with the heroine but evil stepmother uses her so called power over the hero and manipulates the situation so that misunderstandings are created and Hero ends up hating the heroine


Think you have seen/ heard of it before...? I certainly have 😆


1115557 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: NandiniRaizadaa

Its a totally Ekta Kapoor typical Mama's boy hero type show

It has nothing to do with the novel really and has that age old typical Ekta storyline which she has shown in shows like Naagin etc

Evil Witch and Hero's step mother kills Heroine's mother and heroine needs to avenge her mother. Hero is devoted to his step mother and does what she says. However he falls in love with the heroine but evil stepmother uses her so called power over the hero and manipulates the situation so that misunderstandings are created and Hero ends up hating the heroine


Think you have seen/ heard of it before...? I certainly have 😆


Sounds like Naagin S1 story with super ugly leads?!
1115557 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: Neenzm

Hi guys just watched the colors chandrakanta. I don't know how to describe it. What was that??? Too much ladies drama. I m sure it will be another saas bahu saga. No soothing music like our pyp chandrakanta. Upar se hadh to tab ho gyi (sorry using hindi) jab Virendra ka item song aa gya. Kya hai yeh, kuch bhiii??? Mujhe to lead cast ki acting bhi zyada achi nhi lagi. No offences. This ck matches no where with life ok chandrakanta

It was a super duper torture on our sane minds.
I was fainting after I managed to sit through 1 hr of this nonsense, hoping for some miracles though I knew right from the promo stage that this one gonna suck so bad.
The acting is SO bad and the vfx is so cringeworthy that I had to play games in my phone to help me endure the torture for 1 hr.
Costumes?! My oh My, itna ghatiya costumes koi princess or any other royals padhta hai kya!
They looked horrendously cheap!!
Also I dunno why EK is obsessed with hiring ugly lead actors .
What point she wants to prove?
Here toh the lead actress is ugly to the point of being qualified to play a Rakshasi instead of princess Chandrakanta.
Also she's extremely pathetic as an actress so I don't know really how...I mean HOW Madhurima got casted as Chandrakanta?!
I never liked her from the very beginning but I hoped to see some miracles from her regarding her acting but she disappointed me.
She was good as Tanu in KumKum Bhagya but she flops as Chandrakanta.
Vishal is UGLY,UGLY,UGLY and nothing else.
His tandaav was ROFLMAO and topped KVB's tandaav shown a few weeks back in Naagin 2.
Ekta needs to fire her choreographers responsible for these tandaav nrityas(read item numbers) like right now.
Indian Tv has stooped to a new low with Chandrakanta.
Let's pray that we might see some good supernatural shows instead of this rubbish

VABHAM thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#15
OMG!!such strong negative reactions from everyone!!😲😆
Thank god i have nt watched ekta's ck😎
n now wouldnt even dare to watch at gunpoint!!😆

But yes, what i saw of the promos, Ck's clothes r real tacky n Ekta's Virendra🤢...Vishal Singh's body language n costumes look so funny n yucky!!
Isnt Ck supposed to be a young princess??Bt Madhurima looks much older for the part n her voice n dialogue delivery absolutely flat👎🏼
OriginalJuhi_04 thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 8 years ago
#16
Guys, if you want to bash any show or character then do it but don't bash or insult the actors calling them ugly, pathetic or rakshas. It's mean to say that. I do my find anything wrong with Madhurima casted as Chandrakanta. She is beautiful and talented actress. Vishal is also fine. I don't get what's wrong with people to bash an actor on their looks like Shivani Tomar, Karthika Nair, Aditi Gupta and now Madhurima Tuli and Vishal Aditya Singh. Jitna show aur concept ko vash karna hai karo par actors ko bash na karo.

Coming to the topic, Colors CK is so horrible with she being called daasi and naukrani. If that's not enough she is also shown cleaning the king's(Shiv Dutt's father) shoes with her dupatta. SD of Life Ok ranted for weeks that he will make CK his daasi but in Colors version CK is actually a daasi in SD's palace. Very soon, cvs will show CK as a daasi for Irawati and Virendra. 7-8 year old boy being betrothed to a 1-2 month old baby girl was another shocking thing. Can't they show the kids almost of the same age?
Edited by angel_juhi04 - 8 years ago
1115557 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: VABHAM

OMG!!such strong negative reactions from everyone!!😲😆

Thank god i have nt watched ekta's ck😎
n now wouldnt even dare to watch at gunpoint!!😆

But yes, what i saw of the promos, Ck's clothes r real tacky n Ekta's Virendra🤢...Vishal Singh's body language n costumes look so funny n yucky!!
Isnt Ck supposed to be a young princess??Bt Madhurima looks much older for the part n her voice n dialogue delivery absolutely flat👎🏼

Madhurima's voice is too rough that I at first thought she had sore throat at the time of shooting.
Then I realised her voice is like that 🥱
True, her dialogue delivery is very flat
But she's somewhat better than Vishal as an actor.
Madhurima is not only looks old, but overall she's not beautiful enough to play the role.
Madhurima could've done justice to the role of Iravati instead

1115557 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: angel_juhi04

Guys, if you want to bash any show or character then do it but don't bash or insult the actors calling them ugly, pathetic or rakshas. It's mean to say that. I do my find anything wrong with Madhurima casted as Chandrakanta. She is beautiful and talented actress. Vishal is also fine. I don't get what's wrong with people to bash an actor on their looks like Shivani Tomar, Karthika Nair, Aditi Gupta and now Madhurima Tuli and Vishal Aditya Singh. Jitna show aur concept ko vash karna hai karo par actors ko bash na karo.

Coming to the topic, Colors CK is so horrible with she being called daasi and naukrani. If that's not enough she is also shown cleaning the king's(Shiv Dutt's father) shoes with her dupatta. SD of Life Ok ranted for weeks that he will make CK his daasi but in Colors version CK is actually a daasi in SD's palace. Very soon, cvs will show CK as a daasi for Irawati and Virendra. 7-8 year old boy being betrothed to a 1-2 month old baby girl was another shocking thing. Can't they show the kids almost of the same age?

Don't know about Additi Gupta and Karthika Nair, but the other actors you've mentioned gets bashed due to their pathetic acting skills.
I thought Madhurima Tuli was a good actor, but surprisingly, she's not.
She was much better off in KumKum bhagya as Tanu.
And nobody can stop me from calling Vishal ugly.
He's UGLY, UGLY, UGLY.
And his acting is also super bhangaar so what Do I say.
There are actors like Irrfan Khan and Nawazuddin Siddique whose acting skills force us to overlook their average looks .
Infact, I'm an ardent fan of this 2 actors just because of their acting only.
Vishal Aditya Singh has a constipated face and he's SO ugly that I vomited when I saw him.
I find everything wrong in the decision to cast Madhurima and Vishal as Chandrakanta and Virendra.
I don't like PYP CK also, but just that Ekta has managed to make a product much worse than PYP CK so PYP CK scored an easy win.
It's simply now the comptetition of who's the uglier Chandrakanta, Kritika Kamra or Madhurima Tuli?


OriginalJuhi_04 thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 8 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: Luna99

Don't know about Additi Gupta and Karthika Nair, but the other actors you've mentioned gets bashed due to their pathetic acting skills.
I thought Madhurima Tuli was a good actor, but surprisingly, she's not.
She was much better off in KumKum bhagya as Tanu.
And nobody can stop me from calling Vishal ugly.
He's UGLY, UGLY, UGLY.
And his acting is also super bhangaar so what Do I say.
There are actors like Irrfan Khan and Nawazuddin Siddique whose acting skills force us to overlook their average looks .
Infact, I'm an ardent fan of this 2 actors just because of their acting only.
Vishal Aditya Singh has a constipated face and he's SO ugly that I vomited when I saw him.
I find everything wrong in the decision to cast Madhurima and Vishal as Chandrakanta and Virendra.
I don't like PYP CK also, but just that Ekta has managed to make a product much worse than PYP CK so PYP CK scored an easy win.
It's simply now the comptetition of who's the uglier Chandrakanta, Kritika Kamra or Madhurima Tuli?



If you are here to bash actors and call them names don't comment on my post. Its a request. You can't call anyone ugly. You are simply breaking the forum rules and disrupting the peace of this forum. There is never any fight on this forum but your comments will seriously attract people from this forum and other forums. If you don't like any of the shows why even bother to comment? I guess you are the most beautiful girl in the entire universe that you find Kritika and Madhurima ugly. Stop being childish in your comments please. Your comments can seriously put our forum in trouble where people can report us for for bashing actors. No one is ugly and bhangaar but its the show which is ruining their talents. Also its not necessary for the heroines to always be thin with honey like voice. I love how Madhurima looks with proper weight and with a strong voice. There is something called decency in criticizing someone instead of commenting on their looks. You even bashed on Gaurav's looks and called Life Ok's Chandrakanta as bhangaar.
Edited by angel_juhi04 - 8 years ago
1115557 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: angel_juhi04


If you are here to bash actors and call them names don't comment on my post. Its a request. You can't call anyone ugly. You are simply breaking the forum rules and disrupting the peace of this forum. There is never any fight on this forum but your comments will seriously attract people from this forum and other forums. If you don't like any of the shows why even bother to comment? I guess you are the most beautiful girl in the entire universe that you find Kritika and Madhurima ugly. Stop being childish in your comments please. Your comments can seriously put our forum in trouble where people can report us for for bashing actors. No one is ugly and bhangaar but its the show which is ruining their talents. Also its not necessary for the heroines to always be thin with honey like voice. I love how Madhurima looks with proper weight and with a strong voice. There is something called decency in criticizing someone instead of commenting on their looks. You even bashed on Gaurav's looks and called Life Ok's Chandrakanta as bhangaar.

Have I anyways say Madhurima is fat?
Can you tell me why you're interpreting my comments about Madhurima being ugly as I've called her fat?
Madhurima's facial features aren't suitable for playing a young princess.
She's good in modern roles, but she's not pretty enough to play Chandrakanta.
If you want to see who can justify the role of princess, you need to see Pooja Sharma as Draupadi in Mahabharat.
She channeled both the innocence and fierceness of Draupadi perfectly.
Also you may need to see Kashmira Irani's performance as Draupadi in Dharmakshetra.
She also did play her role perfectly.
Being a princess is not just about looks but acting also.
You need to have grace and grandeur to play a princess like Chandrakanta.
Both Kritika and Madhurima lacks these aspects also along with being not beautiful enough.
Madhurima's voice is rough and scratchym
Same goes with the Virendras too
Aham Sharma or Gautam Rode would've been perfect.
They've the required looks, grandeur and acting style to justify the role of Virendra
I wonder why instead of creating a quality product, Ekta chose to compete with Life Ok Chandrakanta.
Also her competition has no meaning as she chose such bad leads for her Chandrakanta that now people are choosing Kritika and Gaurav over her leads.
Honestly, the battle of Chandrakantas officially end in a tie with the 2 sets of Chandrakantas and Virendras being locked in a battle of whose the worse pair.🤢
You may live in your own bubble, crushing on ugly Chandrakantas and vomitworthy Virendras.
I'm off to watch the DD Version.
That'll heal everything.

Edited by Luna99 - 8 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".