Originally posted by: SaacheeSyna
Possible
But then I don't get why is it shown that the second scenario means ..he hasn't changed at all...I mean yes..shooting him and everything would have been wrong...but he took his keys and not a gun...and I feel as a husband he has every right and also is his duty to make sure that the one who tormented his wife, should apologize to her...
I know Krishna is a changed man...but don't want him to change so much that he says to pratigya to forget the incident...
No matter how much he is changed...I want that inherent aggression and passion in him...
Ofc..if he indulged in hitting Radhe..then he is back to square one..but if he did not..then as Naz pointed out he will be labelled "Jhoru ka Ghulam"..in a way..Krishna is damned if he does, damned if he don't..
My input though..a violence always remains a violence..it cannot be condoned based on circumstance..that is what CV's are trying to impute..if u remember..Krishna was beating that thief black n blue..but P and Aman will talk about law..meaning that Violence is not done..if the CV's continue that path ..then Violence will be stopped ..
I agree, A hubby is oath bound to protect the honor and dignity of his wife..which can be achieved by intimidation ..and making him apologize in front of every one...This way..we get the "EXPLOSIVE SITUATION" too ..An humiliated Radhe will be smarting for revenge and will becom a willing tool in the destruction process of KRIYA..