Cvs! Krishna's true feelings are out...... - Page 2

Originally posted by: anusarkar

Underlined. You might be right ,but I have my doubts.

Anu

Originally posted by: anusarkar

Hello Naz,

I am not here to please biased Krishna supporters like you and your friends. You guys do not refrain to degrade Pratigya . If you have the right to discuss about Pratigya,then why do I have to answer to you when I discuss about krishna, I will write what I feel and I feel Krishna is not right for Pratigya.

My philosophy is never to bow down to any one in any condition. My philosophy is that every woman should be financially independant irrespective of their marital status The way you get pissed @ posts criticizing Krishna,I get pissed @posts where Pratigya is criticized.

Anu

Originally posted by: carisma2

Anu,

Discussions against pratigya were not carried out to bash her or call her evil. If you feel something wrong is said about Pratiga then come into the thread and have a discussion.

K is feeling sorry for his OLD dad working. He does not know his is evil - he is pretending to work so that shaktia can work. you missed out the bit where he said i want to work but because of the kanooni ghair kanooni stuff i cant.

Anu you read somethig about Pratigya....... But then you just get your own back by bashing Kriishna. This is a revenge game you are playing. If you are a true pratigyan - then discuss Pratigya and defend her in the discussion topic. Rather than making revenge threads.

But anyway it's useless to talk on this topc with you.

You completely misunderstand krishna's character. All that was said abt P was that the way she spoke was inappropriate... there are better ways of saying it.

FORUM MEMBERS PLEASE... IF YOU DO NOT LIKE THIS THREAD.. AND YOU KNOW THESE KRISHNA BASHING THREADS IS NOT THE FIRST NOR WILL IT BE THE LAST, BECAUSE IF WE SAY THE TRUTH ABOUT PRATIGYA PEOPLE JUST TAKE IT OUT ON KRISHNA... SO AVOID THESE THREADS AND COMMENTING IN IT.

AS THE NEGATIVITY IT CREATES IS HUGE!

Originally posted by: dhakarn

dear anuji,

u know i am a stounch supporter of MKAP and Kriya and ofcourse love krishna/arhaan and u very well know that i love pratigya too with almost the same passion................but here i have to disagree.........i think u r not understanding K's character.....he gets angry and says horroundous things...but he forgets it quickly....there is no dirt in his mind.......and pratigya knows this......he is showing compassion only to his father and pratigya...............and its this quality that makes him human.............so don't bash him by saying that feeling sad/bad for his dad is wrong.............every son is entitled to think so...........and with K, who is such a worse son, we should be glad that he is thinking along the lines of work for the sake of his dad rather than complain..............so what if he doesn't listen to P? is he her slave to do her bidding? exactly as P is not his slave to do as he orders her................kriya does things for each other bec they 'love' each other..............see here krshna is going to lie.......but his intentions r good.........if u remember the scene chandu tells him to do the dirama for 1 week and just give some money at home(by borrowing from friends, not by doing gundagiri) to make sakthi take back his resolution and they will find a suitable job in the mean time...............see, he is willing to do anything for his father even if it means going against his wishes.................same as he has been doing for pratigya................and why does P has to leave him? husband and wife won't just turn their back on each other for silly matters..............here They r soul mates too..............P knows very well that krishna just don't mean anything he says when he is angry......and K is always known to look for the easy way out unless he wants it badly............like how he got P's love..........but that doesn't mean P has to threaten him with her absence in his life everytime he is not doing what she wants him to do.............

Originally posted by: anusarkar

Hello Dhakarn,

First of all,nice to see you back. Thanks......di 😊I mostly post threads on issues close to my heart and one of them is woman rights which includes treatment of women and domestic violence. This forum is a homogeneous forum where most members are Krishna fans and seriously I have no problem with that. I am not here to please anyone with my opinion nor to bash anyone. I expect the same thing for me. But I do have the right to express my feelings. I see posts after posts where Pratigya is bashed for every single reason. Why is that allowed? I am beginning to think that this forum is krishna oriented and I been a voice for Pratigya is not accepted. That is a single reason I refrain myself in commenting in any threads because I know there is no point in having a conversation with biased fan. But I know you are not one of them. So, I am taking the time to explain you what I think.

Dhakarn ,I understand krishna's character very well. He is a person who believes that his wife is his property. He and only he has the right to treat his wife the way he wants too. He feels it is OK for him to say harsh things and verbally abuse her. But its not OK for others. He needs to understand that she is not his property and it is not OK to verbally abuse her in any condition whether it is him or his family. agree with u there....but he has been always like that and i don't think we have a problem with this attitude of his when he is in a romantic mood.......same goes when he is in an angry mood.........he thinks she is his and that's why he takes his feelings out on her, be it love, anger, confusion, frustration.....anything.........and if u remember P does the same to him, when she is upset with anything/anyone she takes her feelings out on him.........bec they consider each other his/hers.........with no price tag attached..........and isn't that why we have fallen in love with kriya....😳

Please remember loving someone does not give the very person the right to abuse. he is not abusing her.........abuse is a strong word......he is not purposefully abusing her..........he is reacting to the tension and confusion around him.........i think their 'taking out their feelings on one another' thing is a true mark of love in their unique relationship.........just my POV

We are all humans. You said Krishna's reaction and attitude makes him a human. Yes, he is a human ofcourse. So is Sajjan ,Shakti ,Amma, Komal etc. They are all thakur's and their feelings are all the same . None of them can control their anger and they are hard core criminals. So what kind of humans are they ? They are humans with animal instinct. There is a fine line. So where does it leave Krishna? This is where the power to differentiate between good and evil comes to question. There is always a choice.but he doesn't know the real face of his father yet......so if he thinks he has to support his father whom he loves the most in the world after P isn't wrong His decision to support his dad by lying to Pratigya is the wrong choice and decision he will take. He will realize that when Pratigya's heart is broken. I know once a heart is broken it never goes back to the same place. Krishan will realize this ,because his betrayal will hurt her tremendously.betrayal ? its not betrayal...betrayal is something u do to hurt and cause damage to the person who trusts in u purposefully with no remorse...he is just cooking up a lie for a week so that he can make sakthi go to work and help SS and also he has plans to look for a job meanwhile.........and if u saw the promo he is feeling guilty in lying to P...........so how is this betrayal?

Marraige should never be a slavery for anyone. But I do feel that Pratigya is a slave in the Thakur house. She does not even go to see her parents anymore because asked her not to. This is wrong. If the son is allowed to live with his parents after marraige, a daughter should have equal rights to visit her parents anytime she wants. I love here the way we Americans live. After marraige the couple moves to their own paradise not with any parents. This is how we americans live. There are indian families who live here as if they are living in India, After marraige there is a reason why the couple should be left alone for sometime because it gives them the space to understand each other better. Too much interference creates unneccesary problems. well, in india these types of joint family system prevails............and if u notice, the undercurrent of love btn the thakurs is evident even when they r arguing or trying to kill each other........and family is family, no replacement........just bec u r married don't mean u have to go away from ur parents or siblings or grandparents......P is not going now, ok , but do u think if she chooses to visit them K will say no to her.....? no , he will definitely say 'go P, go'............. i come from a huge joint family..........the great grand mother of my grandmother and the great grand mother of my grand father r cousins and we all ( u can imagine the number) live in and around our village in several houses separated by just 5 mins or 10 mins by walk(only bec there is a limit to the number of persons to live in one house).......and even today whenever there is a function (however small) we all will gather at the respective houses and the feeling is great even as u would be seeing them day in and day out......so i think there is no problem in living in a joint family.........just my POV...........

Dhakarn,I am married for 14 years with a person who is not an indian.He is a caucasian. It takes lot of love, understanding and commitment . There is no place for lies, pretences, betrayal etc. The problem with Kriya marraige is that they do not communicate with eachother. Physical attraction does not last for ever. What they need to do at this point is make their priorities straight. Pratigya has her priorities straight. She is only in the Niwas because of Krishna. Now Krishna needs to make his priorities straight . Its his parents or his wife. why do a man has to choose either his parents or wife? why can't he choose both? and i think he is not choosing anyone here, anyway always it has been P barring two occasions..... Because Pratigya's life is in danger in the Niwas. he doesn't know that....... I am personally requesting the Cvs to start the Pratigya Niwas Track. The Thakur Niwas is a hell and want Pratigya out of there. I really do not care if she leaves with or without Krishna. The thakur's are in a mission to hurt DILs and now its Ps turn.

Anu

Originally posted by: anusarkar

Hello Dhakarn, You have to understand that I do not casually comment on any character traits . I always critically analyze the character with a lawyers point of view. When I use the word abuse, I am referring to the way abuse is been described in the book of law. And krishna's behavior towards Pratigya is considered as abuse. He verbally abuses her and he seriously needs to stop.Also, could you clarify what you meant by Pratigya is barring occasions? Anu