Ka Double Standards - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

40

Views

3.5k

Users

18

Likes

230

Frequent Posters

nisha2010 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: yemi3006

Well.... if we are pointing out double standards...... what about Komal raging about wanting justice brought on Jai? ...... where was her sense of justice when she lied to police about the Kesar case?

Well.... surprise..... surprise..... P is the only consistent one insisting on justice on both issues (to what degree she will go with the hit & run case remains to be seen) ........


wat i feel sometimes is that principles r for others ,.either way ..................they can b broken as per one's own conviniace.........😆
damon_biteme thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: starlight123



This is just my opinion, but the difference is that the Professor stands for the truth and he is the one who has back flipped. We had that whole scene between Professor and Pratigya about fighting for the truth, no matter what the difficult path it is, but when it came to relationships which concerned the Prof he realised the importance of these relationships and the need to maintain them. At that time there was no thought for collateral damage but the truth and justice should prevail.



Star you caught my point why doesn't he think of collateral damage when it comes to the Thakurs why doesn't he think that relationships need to be mantained with also at the end of the day one of his daughter is marrioed into their family. if he is ready to bend his rule for the Mathurs why not for the thakurs and if he can't do it for the thakurs then he shouldn't do it for the mathurs.

Edited by krishna_chalbo - 14 years ago
Rahm thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: starlight123



This is just my opinion, but the difference is that the Professor stands for the truth and he is the one who has back flipped. We had that whole scene between Professor and Pratigya about fighting for the truth, no matter what the difficult path it is, but when it came to relationships which concerned the Prof he realised the importance of these relationships and the need to maintain them. At that time there was no thought for collateral damage but the truth and justice should prevail.



Exactly! At that time Amma and Shakti put Kesar's life in danger and killed her baby.

Jai put Adarsh's life in danger and nearly killed him. He's lucky he survived.

Professor said that truth and justice is above all to Prats when she decided to put her bro in law and mother in law in jail. So where is that truth and justice now? Jai deserved to be punished and they were basically washing his feet. UTTERLY RIDICULOUS!

This is why I find the Thakurs more digestible. At least they don't stand on some high horse and pretend to be the murthi of truth and justice. They are what they are and it's clear.

Saxes stand on high horses when it comes to Thakurs but anyone else they are willing to lick their feet.
Krishna_krishna thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#14
For Sucksena's everything is fair in their love with Mathur's & war with Thakur's.😡
Love-u-all thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: starlight123



This is just my opinion, but the difference is that the Professor stands for the truth and he is the one who has back flipped. We had that whole scene between Professor and Pratigya about fighting for the truth, no matter what the difficult path it is, but when it came to relationships which concerned the Prof he realised the importance of these relationships and the need to maintain them. At that time there was no thought for collateral damage but the truth and justice should prevail.



But there is difference between a road side accident and a premeditated brutal beating of a helpless woman, a wife--- and murdering her unborn..... - A MURDER.....- but this an accident by JM was without a motive, two different things. Besides JM could'nt be sent to jail because of his age and would have eventually gone free after a few weeks in juvenile rehabilitation.
Shashi2011 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: Krishna_krishna

For Sucksena's everything is fair in their love with Mathur's & war with Thakur's.😡


😲 yaaaaaaaaaa🤢
Rahm thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#17
Prag,

Jai's accident might not have been premeditated, but he left an injured bleeding Adarsh on the road side. He showed NO remorse whatsoever for what he did afterwards. WHAT is that? THAT is evil! How could he have not felt shame or fear for what he did? It's just as bad as Shakti only Adarsh got lucky and survived whereas the baby did not.
-Sheena- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC



But there is difference between a road side accident and a premeditated brutal beating of a helpless woman, a wife--- and murdering her unborn..... - A MURDER.....- but this an accident by JM was without a motive, two different things. Besides JM could'nt be sent to jail because of his age and would have eventually gone free after a few weeks in juvenile rehabilitation.



I dont know if you know that in India there are far too many cases where rash driving by young rich brats cause accidents where lives are lost mainly the poor. These rich brats get away with it because of their connection and money. They know they will get away with it because the victim are the poor, no one to stand for them and get them justice. This is a social evil that exists in India and needs to be addressed.

Crime is a crime no matter how it happened, and he did not break 1 but many rules. The worst was leaving the victim to die and driving off.

Any time in juvie would have been better than nothing. He would have learnt a valuable lesson in jail, especially being IG son
Edited by starlight123 - 14 years ago
damon_biteme thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: Rahm

Prag,

Jai's accident might not have been premeditated, but he left an injured bleeding Adarsh on the road side. He showed NO remorse whatsoever for what he did afterwards. WHAT is that? THAT is evil! How could he have not felt shame or fear for what he did? It's just as bad as Shakti only Adarsh got lucky and survived whereas the baby did not.



Rahm,
I was about to point that out that it was hit and run case. and we never saw him regretting the act infact if i remember he was very callous about it when he was mentioning it to his friends. You pointed it correct Aadarsh would be dead if Aman ahdn't taken him to the hospital. Wondering if Professor's stance would have been the same if Aadarsh was crippled for life. Also why didn't he ask what Aadarsh wanted to do with Jai as Aadarah was living with the consequences. Didn't he have the right to to decide whether he wanted to continue with the case or not. Like father like daughter. she never asked Kesar whether she wanted to file the FIR or not similar papa sucksena didn't think it was important to ask the victim again.As far Aadarsh who has been suspicious of Jai from the day he has seen him, stands upto his name an aadarsh beta supports dad irrespective of whether he is right or wrong.

Edited by krishna_chalbo - 14 years ago
Aeryn thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: krishna_chalbo



Komal has never been potrayed as a character who believes in what is right needs to be done. she has been potryed as a spoilt brat who only understands her benefit. she doesn't dwell into the what is right and what is wrong she selfishly only does what she thinks is correct so i wldn't consider as double standards but again that is my point of view.

Right there with you KC.
Komal isn't prats nor has she ever claimed or pretended to be.....she doesn't believe in doing things on a what's right or wrong basis.....she's protecting and standing up for those she loves.....so yes, I too, do not consider this as hypocrisy....
Whereas the prof is always parading around preaching to whoever wants to hear to stand by the truth no matter what.....but when he, himself is confronted to a delicate situation, gone is the stand by the truth motto ----That's blatant hypocrisy in my book
Edited by Aeryn - 14 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".