Posted:
Does anyone find Shagun's statements and actions contradictory š I DO . In flashback, she says to Raman that their son Adi can't live without her so she is taking him with her, then she sends him to hostel š Then why taking him with her ? š she sent him to hostel knowing the boy can't live without her š then she had to leave him with Raman naa, at least the guy could have been with his one parent.
Going by the flashback scene, Shagun didn't want to have a second child, Its Raman who wanted to have another child rather a daughter. She made it clear '' you wanted Ruhi ''. Shagun who was selfish enough to leave a six months old chid just because she cannot take care of her all the time and her new lifestyle wont allow her to do so is now seeking her child's custody after 5 years š I liked what the lawyer asked her , she who left a six months child has suddenly remembered the existence of her child after 5 years š such newly found motherly feeling š¤
Shagun seems to be a confused and contradictory,she left the kid she wanted to be with her and now she is behind the kid she didn't want to have š Some may argue she has developed soft corner for Ruhi over the years but what about Aditdy ? has her affection for Aditya been reduced ? Why doesn't she think of getting Adi home ?so now she has motherly feeling for Ruhi but not for Adi ? š
Anupamaa
Tu Juliet Jatt Di
Naagin 7
