vegetarianism Vs the Non-vegentarianism

charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
Alright so we have been flirting the diplomatic waters for some time and in the midst of it all, I realized how productively I waste time here , often sneaking during the work hour. But in all it's been a lovely experience and enriching to exchange so many opinions. So Kudos everyone.
Snapping out of the gush-fest, this is probably my first ever debate topic. Now before you eye-roll about this century old topic. Lets take this above the usual religious nomenclature and merit it solely on philosophical, biological and food chain basis. It would be interesting to see what and how both these lifestyles contribute to human evolution.

I don't know if this is repetitive but I am clearly not vying the two against each other but just trying to find their selling points.

Can we please and pretty please not bring any religious sentiments . Also respect the individual opinion and their choices.

Created

Last reply

Replies

23

Views

2.4k

Users

11

Likes

36

Frequent Posters

return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#2

Human beings were hunter gatherers first. Early humans relied heavily on meat supplemented by gathered berries. Agriculture and pure vegetarianism came later. By nature humans are carnivores/omnivores in the food chain. Biologically our bodies are designed to consume and digest meat. Unlike many pure herbivores we are unable to digest many plant celluloses. Meat supplemented with plenty of fruits and vegetables for other nutrients is an ideal lifestyle for humans. Meat is desirable due to high protein and iron content. However, vegetarian diets can provide these through pulses, grains, beans, milk, spinach etc.

The cons of meat consumption in the modern era are

- Overconsumption

- Factory farming and inhumane practices

- Inherent pain and suffering to animals for our needs

- Issues with high cholesterol, blood pressure and heart disease due to consumption of fatty meat or excessive consumption

- Tendency to lack healthy intake of fruits and vegetables

- Susceptibility to salmonella, swine disease, mad cow, and other such animal borne diseases

- The challenge of GMO and other technologies to increase production

The cons of vegetarianism in the modern era are

- Overconsumption

- Tendency to lack healthy intake of iron and protein

- Unsustainable farming practices that deplete land quality and cause erosion

- Economic challenges of rural agrarian economies

- Chemicals and pesticides used to in agriculture leech into soils, ground water systems and affect ecosystems

- The challenge of GMO and other technologies to increase production

- Plants are also living and do suffer pain, albeit differently from animals (this point can be disputed)

I'm sure there are more, this is by no means exhaustive. I think no matter what diet we follow philosophically, we humans put a burden on earth. We should have the freedom to choose our diets. As far as possible one should try to ensure their meat and vegetables comes from sustainable sources that is humane and has minimal impact on the environment. Unfortunately, this is accessible only to the elite right now due to cost constraints. Lower income people have no choice but to eat what is obtained most cheaply. Some people are not even in a position to choose vegetarian or non vegetarian - they eat what they get.

charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
Brilliant as usual Hades!
Let me try to bring some more insight to what you mentioned. I am intrigued when you suggest that biologically our body is designed for eating meat.
I take your point about cellulose but there are few major points which peg our body suited more towards vegetarianism. The intestine length is longer than a general carnivorous animal , this increase gives humans an edge to break down fibers and absorb plan based food.
The digestive acids are weaker in humans in comparison to the meat eating animals.
As much as we have evolved our limbs are not perfect for shredding or killing animals. Our ancestors had to invent the weapons or use stones for killing, no natural assistance.
Meat eating seems to have started after scavenging the dead remains of animals.
Agriculture as you mentioned started later but it was that which encouraged rearing of animals and the subsequent use as food.

Food chain - I don't know how humans influence the food chain. I see that if we remove humans from the order, it will still continue to remain stable. I doubt there is a specie which is dependent on us.

If the proteins nutritional value can be achieved by pulses etc than that makes meat a replaceable part of our diet. Not a natural supplement.


I feel the pros and cons are more because of misuse of humans than anything else. Agree there are those who do not get a chance to decide their meal. Hence it becomes even more important for the privileged lot to understand the food dynamics and maybe not burden the Mother earth.


return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
Genie - I would say we are omnivores. We have neither full fledged carnivore or herbivore traits. Our diet is to be a mix in between.
charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Genie - I would say we are omnivores. We have neither full fledged carnivore or herbivore traits. Our diet is to be a mix in between.


But what does omnivores means -what is the percentage divide? It cannot be 50% for both. I just feel calling humans omnivores is a good compromise , not an answer.

But yeah I get what you say, our eating habits have become more acclimatized with evolution , need and desire. So we may have picked on either because of our experience.

I find it fascinating that for a race which prides on being most evolved and intelligent we are the most ambiguous about our eating habits.
return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: charminggenie


But what does omnivores means -what is the percentage divide? It cannot be 50% for both. I just feel calling humans omnivores is a good compromise , not an answer.

But yeah I get what you say, our eating habits have become more acclimatized with evolution , need and desire. So we may have picked on either because of our experience.

I find it fascinating that for a race which prides on being most evolved and intelligent we are the most ambiguous about our eating habits.



To be honest I don't know the divide. I've seen healthy to unhealthy extremes in pure vegetarians as well as carnivores. Rather than meat vs. veggies the divide of our diet should be proteins, fats, carbs, nutrients per healthy recommended doses (which also keeps changing with each study 😆)

We pride ourselves on being most evolved - but most humans cannot survive wilderness on our own. The cockroach survived what killed the dinosaurs and will survive our nuclear winter as well. So who's the real boss? Who's really evolved for life on earth?

We pride ourselves on being most intelligent - but our dogs and cats understand what we say, but we don't get what they say. Most animals run upland before a tsunami or start running first in case of forest fires - but we are the last to realize imminent danger. Who's really intelligent?

I think we humans have just nicely deluded ourselves into believing we are special.
McNinja thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#7

Anatomically, biologically humans share more traits with herbivores than we do with carnivores. The alkalinity of our saliva, the level of acidity in our stomach, the type of teeth we have etc point to us being more of herbivores. We've been conditioned to eat meat, more now considering how easy it is to access and store. It's like, carnivores can't live without their meat, herbivores can't live without their plants, while humans can usually wing it on either end..may not be healthy, but feasible.

I might be reaching here, I think being an omnivore might be better off for us in the survival of the fittest scheme of things if faced with a food scare. The body depends on stored fat as a major energy source, especially if faced with starvation, and some of the best fat comes from both veg and non-veg sources...the likes of nuts, seeds, eggs, and fish.

I don't agree with the notion that being one way or the other is healthier. The health aspect comes from the quality of the foods you get and the quality of your diet. We're perfectly capable of being healthy omnivores. Someone said "let them eat cake", I say let them eat chicken. And cake 😆

I'm interested in what people think of humans drinking animal milk. I read a lot about why humans shouldn't consume dairy, namely milk, during my "milk is the anti-christ" phase but I'm yet to be convinced by either side.

charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#8
Ninja Ranger🤗
Ah yeah the diary products.I guess the fact that they are not necessarily essential for a healthy diet and can be easily replaced , hence the flak. The marketing of Diary products for some of the health benefits is highly misquoted and over exaggerated. Like- the main component Calcium is grossly over estimated also the fact that not many can stomach the products and can cause many digestive diseases.

Though i like the egg in my cake and on my plate.

mr.ass thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#9
chicken mutton fish beef pork squid turkey prawn I ate em all!

Non Veg FTW
DianaPrince thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#10
i'll speak in my case
i am a vegetarian since the past 4 years-no eggs,meat, even in cakes ,biscuits all

i tend to eat a lot -cause veg things digest more quickly as compared to meat products
i also eat a lot cause i exercise a lot, really a lot

occasionally i feel lack of energy then i drink some energy drink

i don't know,i feel happier being a vegetarian



Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".