The thing with SLB's films is that they're so much more than just a box office hit or miss. I feel like even though, economically speaking, he's had a few hits and a few misses (Saawariya being an obvious one, even though it was the best adaptation of my favourite novel, "White Nights" that I've ever seen.) His films are much more moving paintings than anything else. I've seriously seen no other director utilize colour, archetypal symbolism, costumes, dance, percussion, music... everything that makes life beautiful (including tragedy) is in his films. And I think THAT is what makes him such an amazing and legendary director despite all the controversy, the underratedness,the lack of audiences. His films are actually for people who would like to "make love with life" if you will. Very classic, soothing, yet soulfully disturbing. I'm guessing his type of art doesn't work in India... but internationally, I have to say, people of all ethnicities and backgrounds adore him. He's an international name.
The lavishness in his films also imitates life in a very artful and fruitful (if not money wise, than at least intelligence and emotional-wise 😆) way. So I think with this guy, it's really difficult to say what exactly is a hit and what is a miss with his films if we don't talk economically. Because all of his films are perhaps the best adaptations I've ever come across. His art moves you, makes you feel, compels you to think about the world we live in, and I think that's what's most important when it comes to achieving greatness as a director of any kind of film.
So I'm kind of disappointed that so many of his masterpieces didn't do well. It's so sad to see his films do poorly because audiences aren't curious enough to look at the underlying shadows of all the brilliant colours in his pictures.
19