Posted:
Usually I bounce off my views on the episode relying on Zuby's analysis,but I don't find her here and have a pressing question. Thus could not help creating a new topic😉.
Keeping the episode analysis for later,can someone more expert in this supernatural genre please tell me- Is talking to the spirit same as talking to the dead body ??!!.
Why did he have to go near the dead body to hear them talk?? If the spirit is inside the body,then the man should be alive? He is dead because he lacks the spirit. Maybe my concept is heavily influenced by the movies I see on this theme- none of these so called psyche's go to a morgue to converse with spirits. So why was the ETF testing the authenticity of his claims by bringing him to a dead body and asking him to speak to it??!
Second doubt- I understand that the eye witness concocted this extremely far fetched story to expose the truth without endangering himself. It was a nice,creative way no doubt but wasn't there alternatives.? Never heard of anonymous calls??. Policemen by law have to investigate any claim made by such calls even if they suspect it is hoax. If someone called recounting a high profile murder- they would have anyways investigated and he would have been spared getting examined by a psychiatrist !!
For me the episode was like a pack of cards. Very well decorated,but crumbled quite soon 😊
