Created

Last reply

Replies

29

Views

2.4k

Users

11

Likes

49

Frequent Posters

RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago
#21
As for Kaikeyi, there are many different stories regarding her.

Valmiki Ramayan writes that Kaikeyi was always a slightly insecure, arrogant woman who was proud of her position as the favorite queen of Dasharatha. Although she was respectful to Kaushalya and Sumitra, there were instances where they had clashes too (unlike what TV serials generally show, with them being all lovey dovey). Kaikeyi did love Rama a lot, like her own son, but when Manthara poisoned her mind, she believed her easily because of her insecurity. She could not conceive the idea that Kaushalya might have more power than her in the palace if she became Rajamata, so she exiled Rama to protect her own position.

In Adhyatma Ramayana (and I think also Tulsidas), there is a far more ideal portrayal of Kaikeyi. TV serials generally base their depiction of Kaikeyi from this version, with her being very sweet, kind and caring towards everyone in the family, including her co-wives. In this version, Devi Saraswati sits on Manthara's tongue while she poisons Kaikeyi, or else Kaikeyi would never have believed her since she loved Ram so much.

In other versions, it is written that Kaikeyi exiled Rama not because she suddenly disliked him or had desire for the throne, but because she wanted Ravan to be killed. There is one story (which NDTV Ramayan showed in 2009) that Kaikeyi's maternal kingdom was once ravaged and plundered by Ravan, and that he'd raped many women too. To avenge the insult, Kaikeyi cursed him that her son would kill him. Since she considered Ram her son just as much as Bharat, she sent him on exile in order to kill Ravan.

One thing is true though. Kaikeyi cannot be compared to Ravan. She was not evil. She may have made some mistakes in her life, but she was never evil. Ravan committed many atrocities against women and sages, so it's foolish to excuse his actions by saying he was a "great" character and such a devout bhakt of Shiva. It doesn't matter. He still did many many sins.
rasyafan thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

As for Kaikeyi, there are many different stories regarding her.

Valmiki Ramayan writes that Kaikeyi was always a slightly insecure, arrogant woman who was proud of her position as the favorite queen of Dasharatha. Although she was respectful to Kaushalya and Sumitra, there were instances where they had clashes too (unlike what TV serials generally show, with them being all lovey dovey). Kaikeyi did love Rama a lot, like her own son, but when Manthara poisoned her mind, she believed her easily because of her insecurity. She could not conceive the idea that Kaushalya might have more power than her in the palace if she became Rajamata, so she exiled Rama to protect her own position.

In Adhyatma Ramayana (and I think also Tulsidas), there is a far more ideal portrayal of Kaikeyi. TV serials generally base their depiction of Kaikeyi from this version, with her being very sweet, kind and caring towards everyone in the family, including her co-wives. In this version, Devi Saraswati sits on Manthara's tongue while she poisons Kaikeyi, or else Kaikeyi would never have believed her since she loved Ram so much.

In other versions, it is written that Kaikeyi exiled Rama not because she suddenly disliked him or had desire for the throne, but because she wanted Ravan to be killed. There is one story (which NDTV Ramayan showed in 2009) that Kaikeyi's maternal kingdom was once ravaged and plundered by Ravan, and that he'd raped many women too. To avenge the insult, Kaikeyi cursed him that her son would kill him. Since she considered Ram her son just as much as Bharat, she sent him on exile in order to kill Ravan.

One thing is true though. Kaikeyi cannot be compared to Ravan. She was not evil. She may have made some mistakes in her life, but she was never evil. Ravan committed many atrocities against women and sages, so it's foolish to excuse his actions by saying he was a "great" character and such a devout bhakt of Shiva. It doesn't matter. He still did many many sins.



True whatever Kekai did it was through influence of Goddess Saraswati Kekai truly loved Ram
whatever you said about Kekai I had no idea never heard about it that she wanted Ravan killed and he destroyed her fathers kingdom and raped women. But Ravan was a cruel evil man even though he was a great shiv bhakt and a very educated person in fact the most intelligent person but then who said education and intelligence makes a person learned 😉 sometimes the opposite happens when that person's eyes are blinded by snobbishness and attitude

there are different versions of same stories I think because they are written by different persons and over different time period and through out 1000s of years
ekta15 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#23
@JanakiRaghunath

I have not read ramayana books of Valmiki and Tulsidas .
But I have read ramayan in text books which is a part of studies in 6th class in India .Also We are seeing Ramleela since childhood .Or hearing the stories from parents and my mom always reads Ramayana and Mahabharat books .She has two versions one of Tulsidas and other of Shakuntlam .
And acc to all ,Ravan had come to swayambar . Of course we don't have proofs but only thoughts and believes in which we want to.
Regarding Ravan ,There is a story where He did got curse by misunderstanding of Rishi . You can compare it like Rukmini in the form of lizard got ,we hear in 'Tara rani ki katha' in jagrans.
I would have shared but I only remember the story not names .I will ask my mom and share it tomorrow .
ekta15 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: rasyafan



True whatever Kekai did it was through influence of Goddess Saraswati Kekai truly loved Ram
whatever you said about Kekai I had no idea never heard about it that she wanted Ravan killed and he destroyed her fathers kingdom and raped women. But Ravan was a cruel evil man even though he was a great shiv bhakt and a very educated person in fact the most intelligent person but then who said education and intelligence makes a person learned 😉 sometimes the opposite happens when that person's eyes are blinded by snobbishness and attitude

there are different versions of same stories I think because they are written by different persons and over different time period and through out 1000s of years

Like now we have different views and thoughts ,Rishi muni or people of before would have different ...now we are reading their thoughts also as facts ,thats it .Isn't it??😉😉

@Rasyafan : Me too liking to read different stories here .
rasyafan thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: ekta-avinafan

Like now we have different views and thoughts ,Rishi muni or people of before would have different ...now we are reading their thoughts also as facts ,thats it .Isn't it??😉😉

@Rasyafan : Me too liking to read different stories here .



exactly 👍🏼👍🏼
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: ekta-avinafan

@JanakiRaghunath


I have not read ramayana books of Valmiki and Tulsidas .
But I have read ramayan in text books which is a part of studies in 6th class in India .Also We are seeing Ramleela since childhood .Or hearing the stories from parents and my mom always reads Ramayana and Mahabharat books .She has two versions one of Tulsidas and other of Shakuntlam .
And acc to all ,Ravan had come to swayambar . Of course we don't have proofs but only thoughts and believes in which we want to.
Regarding Ravan ,There is a story where He did got curse by misunderstanding of Rishi . You can compare it like Rukmini in the form of lizard got ,we hear in 'Tara rani ki katha' in jagrans.
I would have shared but I only remember the story not names .I will ask my mom and share it tomorrow .



I don't think we can claim anything as truth or fact. 😊 Who knows what happened in the treta yuga? Some people tend to take only Valmiki as the ultimate source, since he was a contemporary of Rama, while others believe other versions. It just depends on personal beliefs and what God means to us. Some prefer to view Rama as all human, while others like to think he had divine knowledge during his incarnation. We cannot say one is false and the other is fact. We don't have that right.

As far as Valmiki and Tulsidas go, Ravan did not come to Sita's swayamvar. Tulsidas does mention that Ravan tried to lift the dhanush once (possibly before Sita's birth since he was so old) and failed, but he never came for the swayamvar itself. It is other sources that have Ravan coming to Sita's swayamvar. I think Kamban Ramayana might have that story, but I'm not sure. Valmiki, Ramcharitmanas, and Adhyatma Ramayana have Ravan seeing Sita for the first time in Panchavati only.
harianant thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#27


Ravan was not able to touch the Shiv Dhanush. This is mentioned in the Ramcharitmanas. The verse is highlighted below:-


In the Valmiki Ramayan no swayamvar was announced. Rama went with Vishwamitra to Mithila where Janaka was performing a yagnya. Vishwamitra informed Janaka of Rama's willingness to see such a great Dhanush. Then Janaka informed the story of the dhanush and the what his intentions are. Sita is an ayOnija and Janaka determined to give her in marriage to only that person who could lift the Shiva dhanush and string it.

Valmiki Ramayan is the story of Lord Ram in this Yug. However the Ramcharitmanas covers the stories of Lord Ram from various Kalpas.

In Ramayana, there is a mention in a conversation between Sitaji and Ravana at Ashok vatika when Ravana was trying to tempt Sitaji to accept him by stating his valour deeds.Then Sitaji reminded him that if he was so strong and wanted Sitaji to be his bride why didn't he stringed Shiv danshus at her swamywar.On this Ravana got humiliated and went away from Ashoke vatika.Another reference comes from the King Janak's words at Sitaji's swamywar when all the kings tried out there hands but failed to move the Shivji's bow.Janakji stated - "I think that the earth has become vacant of warriors, where all the kings as well as demons in forms of kings have come to my court and failed to pass this test."This also indicates that demon kings participated in Swamywar but in form of noble kings



Edited by harianant - 12 years ago
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago
#28
^^ Yes, that is true. I mentioned before that in Ramcharitmanas, there is a mention of Ravan trying to lift Shiv Dhanush but failing. However, this did not happen during Sita's swayamvar. It happened much before. Ramcharitmanas mentions that even before Sita's swayamvar, various Gods and demons came in the guise of humans to try and lift the Shiv dhanush. Ravan too came, but not for the swayamvar.
In Valmiki Ramayan, there was no swayamvar like you said. Ravan did not know about Sita until he was informed by one of his spies from the Dandakaranya. When he saw her in Panchavati, it was his first time seeing her.
ekta15 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#29
I will say frankly that its being very difficult for me to believe even after reading it (Bcoz I have been reading that since childhood ,you see)but
I am going to read it in Ramayana we have in home for sure and will share my views .


harianant thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#30

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

^^ Yes, that is true. I mentioned before that in Ramcharitmanas, there is a mention of Ravan trying to lift Shiv Dhanush but failing. However, this did not happen during Sita's swayamvar. It happened much before. Ramcharitmanas mentions that even before Sita's swayamvar, various Gods and demons came in the guise of humans to try and lift the Shiv dhanush. Ravan too came, but not for the swayamvar.

In Valmiki Ramayan, there was no swayamvar like you said. Ravan did not know about Sita until he was informed by one of his spies from the Dandakaranya. When he saw her in Panchavati, it was his first time seeing her.


Yes exactly . You're right. In the Ramcharitmanas this happened much before the Swayamvar.
However, there are many other versions which describe that Ravan was present at the Swayamvar. This may have happened in a different Ram avatara probably.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".