JA: Totally unacceptable the 'HAREM' - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

26

Views

6.4k

Users

19

Likes

97

Frequent Posters

Autumn_Rose thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: yoga23priya


Jodha's palace is called as Marium Uz Zamani Palace and it is located in Agra. About Ruqaiya's Palace, One is located in Agra and other is in near Jamuna River.😊


Oh, I have been here countless times..wahan par Jodha ke jhumke bane hain in her kitchen.

But you know historians say its an error..

Guys that era was oppressive for women in general, the era where things like sati system existed which was abolished only in 1928. Hindu kings too had so many wives, the Harem is just a place where women of the palace live including Mahaangna and Jalal's mother. Why is this such an issue?

Edited by BreezeStar - 12 years ago
.HookandHybrid. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#22
Sorry but I di not understand what you meant to say.

Did not intend to hurt anyone's feeling.
helen_of_troy thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#23
information given by different members is very good
i got 2 know a lot of things
thanks for sharing 🤗
pooja-menon thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 12 years ago
#24
True..even I couldn't bear to think that Jodha will be placed there..
libran90 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#25
O come on people...just chill...ignore those bimbos...itna bhav woh log deserve nahi karte...jitna aap log de rahe ho...inn logo ka kaam sirf khud ko decorate karna hai and do kur kur...at present they are fanning their jealousy for Ruqaiya...later on they will fan their jealousy with Ruqaiya for Jodha...they are just sitting showpieces...nothing else
kiran_89 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#26
even i also want some other nice place 4 hr to stay after marriage..:)
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#27
Every era is oppressive of women, and in every country; it is only a matter of degree, and where you happen to have been born and to live. If you were a woman in Afghanistan today, life would be hell, but despite general conservatism, life there for women was quite civilised till the 1980s. If you were Savita Halappanar in Dublin, and had to die because the rigidly Catholic anti-abortion laws would not let you have an abortion even you were dying after a miscarriage, that would be murderous (legal) oppression. Whether it is domestic violence or being the commodity in the global flesh trade, it is the women who always suffer.

But coming to the issue at hand and to set the record straight, Sati was legally abolished in India much earlier, in 1836,under the then Governor General Lord William Bentinck. The two regions where it was most prevalent were Rajasthan and Bengal. it was unknown in Maharashtra, the Punjab, and the whole of South India. The whole spadework for its abolition was done by the great Bengali reformer, Raja Ram Mohan Roy, and the British agreed to the legislation to abolish it only after he assured them that there would be no general revolt against it. There was none, and the vile practice practically collapsed overnight. This was proof that the social backing for the abolition of Sati was already there.

As for the harem, I agree with you entirely, and I cannot understand all the fuss about it. As for the family viewing angle, so many of the scenes shown on prime time TV these days are infinitely more vulgar than a couple of girls looking like students of belly dancing, and not a squeak out of anyone.

Shyamala B.Cowsik

Originally posted by BreezeStar

Oh, I have been here countless times..wahan par Jodha ke jhumke bane hain in her kitchen.

But you know historians say its an error..

Guys that era was oppressive for women in general, the era where things like sati system existed which was abolished only in 1928. Hindu kings too had so many wives, the Harem is just a place where women of the palace live including Mahaangna and Jalal's mother. Why is this such an issue?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".