(*SPOILER*) And if Dumbledore’s ________ - Page 3

Originally posted by: lakshmi ram

guys,if a wizard is dead his wand will b destroyed right?but there is no mention of dumbledore's wand as far as i noe.
also "severus.........please ...." can also be "severus......please kill me"
maybe he n snape had some plan or the other
also when dumbledore body(so called body bcoz its not shown)erupted into flames,harry feltthat he saw a phoenix rise n fly away.(remember phoenix tears have healin powers.)if dd wasn't dead n only injured what if the fawks had healed him!
also remember that phoenix lament that they all heard!everyone thought that it was fawks lamentin over dd's death but it cud have meant something else.
also dd wuoldn't let hary to call ne1 elso apart from snape!that wou;d have been bcoz it was some sort of plan o something! 😉

this is only my hope! 😳

I just have one thing that I was wondering about Fwakes, I dunno if it makes sense.. Dumbledore was killed by a spell, not by some sword or something.. So, how could Fawkes' tears heal that.. Fawkes didn't even know where Dumbledore was hit, and there weren't any wounds to be healed.. The lament might have done something.. But, I don't see it being possible..

That's just my thoughts tho.. 😛

And, I agree with Mick. I believe that Dumbledore is dead, and ir might as well have been a plan between Dumbledore and Snape..
About, Dumbledore and Snape being polyjuiced, I don't see it possible.. Dumbledore wouldn't kill anyone, no matter how bad they are.. But, they might be bound in Unbreakable Vow, though I don't see that happening either.. Dumbledore trusts Snape completely, and he wouldn't do any kind of "vow" to make sure that he's right..
And, about Voldemort's wand being a horcrux, like avonia said, I don't think it's likely, since anyone can use it.. And, I don't think Voldemort is that stupid to do that (although he is stupid😡 😆 )...
I dunno, but it's just my thought..

Yeah, maybe the idea of the wand is not right as you said...but the one of the Unbreakable Vow I still think it could be right...After all, Snape was one of the best Voldemort's Dead Eaters and a Vow could have made Dumbledore much more sure about Snape's loyalty! But the possibility that he hasn't made a Vow could be right too. We'll se in the 7th book, because i'm still sure, no I am more sure than ever, that we'll find out something in the last book.
If I thnk that all our doubts will be resolved just in this book, the very last book, well I feel very anxious and nosy...but unfortunately we have to wait a lot of time.... 😭 😭 😭

Yeah, I know what you mean. Two years is a lot of time to wait.. I'm feeling as anxious as anyone here.. But, it's soo sad it's the last book, and that we have to wait that long 😭.. But, I think it might be worth it.. And, atleast there are other things to look forward to, like the fourth movie... 😊

Yeah, for fortune, we've got the movies!!
I'm looking forward to the 4th, and more for the 5th and 6th...
But...you said two years, is it sure that we've to wait so much? I hope we'll have to wait for less time than 2 years!!

Originally posted by: achal

I just have one thing that I was wondering about Fwakes, I dunno if it makes sense.. Dumbledore was killed by a spell, not by some sword or something.. So, how could Fawkes' tears heal that.. Fawkes didn't even know where Dumbledore was hit, and there weren't any wounds to be healed.. The lament might have done something.. But, I don't see it being possible..

That's just my thoughts tho.. 😛

achal , i mentioned earler that dd might have been only badly hurt.

remember book5 when harry was running after bellatrix in MOM?he aimed a cruciatus curse on her but he failed.she mentioned that one must MEAN an unforgivable curse 4 it to work well.
what if snape did not mean his avada kedavra on dumbledore?so it migt not have worked the way the usual killing curse works.

also it was not the way the usual avada kedavra works.remember frank bryce ?he was killed by voldemort n was killed b4 he hit the floor once AK wa casted on him.
but dumbledore's case was different.he remained suspended in air 4 sum time b4 fallin down the staircase.

isn't it all bit tooo unusual?its this unusualness bcoz of which i tend to believe dd is not gone

Yeah, I kno what you mean, and I guess you're right.. He might not be dead.. But, the what about the portrait. The portriat only shows DEAD headmasters and headmistress.. But, it have been a mistake..
And, then there's the wand thing again.. And, nothing about his wand has been mentioned in the book..
I dunno, I'm totally confused about whether Dumbledore is dead or not..But, I hope he's not..

Originally posted by: mick

Yeah, for fortune, we've got the movies!!
I'm looking forward to the 4th, and more for the 5th and 6th...
But...you said two years, is it sure that we've to wait so much? I hope we'll have to wait for less time than 2 years!!

I dunno it you read this or not, but it says about the 7th book being realeased on 07-07-07... And, also in one of the interviews (or was it something else) J.K Rowling said somthing like "the book will take me two years to write"...

Originally posted by: avonia

I dont think that making a horocrux out of his wand would have been a good idea, because other people can use your wand even if they can not use it as well as you can, it has happened before; Harry could most prob. use they wand better than anyone else, he does have the brother...Somene had to have kept his wand so not to much dark magic is protecting it and anyone could have snapped it...
Dumbuldore says that he keeps trophies of a sort and objects that are highly connected to the wizarding worlds history (which is also one of the two owls Harry did not pass)

That is where Hermyone is going to play a main role