EPILOGUE
Some one noticed quietly everything..
yes him..
the murderer..
had he not taken that step..
Khushi would have been suffering now also.
Yes, he was indeed a murderer at the eyes of law and order..
but he felt..
if by killing one person if the lives of several people,
who are your own,
are saved from misery is it very wrong??
To save many innocent people if one guilty is punished is it wrong??
He was just the medium..
to end the suffering,
someone has to survive and make way for others to survive..he was the dark horse..
he was the saviour of six families whom he saved from further ruin.
Was he really wrong in the given circumstances??
Was he??
Or had he done the thing which should have been done long ago,
to kill the tree that bore that poisonous fruit??
Was he actually right??
Or
At fault??
wouldn't he be more of a criminal had he not done the deed?
In the court of this world Sanyukta was not a criminal cause her crimes were hidden..her crimes were unseen..
she didn't left a trace..except the ruins..
Is not JUSTICE delayed means JUSTICE denied??
In the court of this world He was wrong..
But..
In the assembly of God..in the court of God..who was punishable??
In the court of God who was at fault???
Today when a girl is raped and tortured to death for six men..
and if someday her father kills them..will he be a criminal??
To avenge is wrong??
Will he be not more at fault if he let loose those men who tortured her
and led her way to death??
For the loved ones..
if avenges is it heinous??
Not as heinous as it had been done by the crime..the root for avenge
Is not REVENGE a kind of wild JUSTICE??
We live in a world where we wait and wait for JUSTICE..
but alas..
most of the times we are disappointed..
most of the criminals flock around and does even more heinous crimes..
as they knew JUSTICE in terms of LAW and ORDER is Blind..
T H E E N D
214