I am thoroughly enjoying this FF and the discussions among the protagonists. Just adding my two penny bit on the debate.Privatization per se is not a bad thing but the Government should know to what extent.An example that bears quoting here is of England and the wholesale privatization of their Railways, of the rolling stock and the tracks, under Margaret Thatcher. This lead to major issues later on because the private players who owned the tracks tried to monopolize them and others could not run their trains on those tracks. Having realized this blunder the government had to buy back the tracks.There are certain spheres where the government has to keep essential controls, a PPP model can be looked at where certain parts can be privatized. It is simple, if public transport is privatized then the private players will essentially be looking at profit and would not provide services on loss making routes, also the fare needs to be controlled. So if some privatization has to be done then the regulatory framework has to be strong and no private player should be allowed to monopolize a service. The government has a social responsibility to provide such services to all citizens even in remote places.One example closer home is privatization of the State Road Transport Services in Madhya Pradesh which has been very unsuccessful. People are held to ransom by the private transporter eg. if a bus has to start at 6:00 a.m. the transporter will not start till the bus is full and that might take however long, as especially in villages or small mofussil towns there are not enough passengers to fill buses on time. so the passenger never knows when the bus will start and the journey finish. On the other hand a state transport bus will start on time and the passenger is assured of reaching wherever he has to on time and not be at the mercy of the transporter...just one example of fulfilling social responsibility, as everything is not about profit.Health, transport, education, infrastructure, law and order maintenance are core activities of the State and the State cannot abdicate its duties. Yes efficiency and effectiveness can always improve.
Am glad you brought up road transportation here. It's something I have been researching for a friend of mine who wants to study traffic patterns and transport infrastructure [read KSRTC here] in a popular tourist destination. Karnataka Road transport revolutionized the concept of public transport system which started a decade ago. This is happening well within the boundaries of government and even with changes, the body of governance has been slowly improving. Sure, there are still many issues regarding the local transportation but it isn't all that difficult anymore to travel. Many, like me, have stopped relying on trains even for long distance travel [since even after commissioning new trains, there haven't been many added in popular routes] and take bus instead.
I saw something interesting while traveling this weekend. A train had its entire body covered, except the parts where there are train number, train name, bogie name and destination name, with advertisement for a locally manufactured soap. Amidst the pink soap and soap dabbas, it was almost impossible to figure out the needed information. My father generally asked the station master [he at one time commuted on train daily] and the station master said that it was one way to make profits. By leasing out space ON train!! I think it was first started in Laloo Prasad Yadav era where he leased out inside of train wall for advertisements.
Regulatory bodies are what is needed whenever we talk about privatization. You have a strong point there when you talk about PPP model where partial privatization would help but will not fully eradicate the issue. But it would be a great starting point.
Thanks a lot for the comment!
44