Claps for the creatives!!

BOWS DOWN to the creatives of Balika Vadhu for giving us such a HUGE reason to be proud of our beloved show.Fans of all the shows crib at how the creatives spoil the moral essence of their loved characters in their ratrace for trps.But we, the 'LUCKY LOT' feel proud of our cvs.They are as mature and sensible as we all expect them to be.

There's one apt quote I remember here..."The real magic of discovery lies not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes ". Today BV creatives have made a new discovery.Many shows have tried to reach this territory but stumbled upon either on the hands of trps or the concern about the orthodox nature of our society.But BV creatives have dared to be different.They have dared to stand against not just evil but regressive thinking as well.

Thankyou CVs for giving us this beautiful show and time and again proving our trust on you correct.YOU GUYS JUST ROCK!! ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️

Agree this. Don't like such one dimensional vilification of a parallel lead. That too on a nobler concept of forgiveness (or its denial). The cvs were artful enough in keeping the character arrogant, 'demanding' and self absorbed even in the hour of his supposed 'awakening' -realised over a 'shock' reveal. The behaviour, which may justify/warrant refusal, is itself contradictory to the original shock which has caused him to introspect, as well, his initial lament for his huge lapses. Then again, while other person had always been forgiving even when not asked, to the extent of being accused of a passive doormat bearing, she has become cognitive of the umpteen unpaid accounts, and ill timed that it may turn son of her adopted family in out right negativity, unacceptable or not reconciled! That too, when only one thing he is pleading for is his family?

Looks like, cvs are embarking on a plot of Anandi-Shiv melding/solidarity in face of twin trials of villain 'Jagya' and scathing Cm. But where went Anandi's healing touch- if not for a consistently wrong friend- then at least for a consistently benevolent family, which stays duty bound to shun their son?!