Posted:
dnt beat me but i really feel it is wrong for any son to just assert he has the right on the wealth, as long as it in my name , and i am alie ican do whatever, it translates to hissa only on death or upon wealth!!
sajjan built his own bussiness he does it mosttly alone , shakti hleps him and since he dsnt really get paid then yes ok i can even buy the fact that he can say i have contributed to this wealjth increase- doesnt really mean thats justifed too but it is more near to truth
as for k, well he was never in the bussiness, got money to start a hotel and has an independent bussiness which he really doesnt use to add to his dads wealth so in that sitiuation how on earth is it his right?
generally speaking, i dnt get the mentaltiy, how come the kids have a right just coz they are the kids, it is the will of the person who has made the property that he ghives to shoever he wants!! well in this regard, i get it that k shakti are irked and want a share but i still feel just by birth it dnst make it liableto get property
Music Corner
Current Affairs
Anupamaa
Udne Ki Aasha
Shiv Shakti
Hindi TV Shows
