Yes SG can say Kunal try to force him saying Rohit had a fight.
But wasn't Thakral suppose to prove that Kunal wasn't driving the car.how would of look now he says Kunal did it
Even if Kunal had no proof, next hearing when Thakral presents that Kunal is the one who"murdered' Rohit well surprise surprise, 15 people can testify that Kunal was at home
KUNAL can say it was his trick to show that Thakral just wants to take revenge from them and that is why even though Kunal was at home, he produced FAKE evidence. So how can court be sure if evidence against Siddhi are valid and not fake presentation by Thakral?