Odd division of property

CONTEST : IPL 2026 Prediction Game

Page

Next Last

tinoo

@tinoo

Rocker

Posted: 13 years ago

I found maasaa's division of property formula quite odd = six equal parts.

The traditional way to do it is to divide the property between bhairon and basant equally in half.

Then bhairon can divide his into three - jagya, anandi and suguna

and basant can give his to one - nandu.

Here it is like bhairon's camp gets four cuts and basant's camp gets two cuts.

Ofcourse it is kalyani devi's property and she can do what she wishes. But I just found it odd to divide by six.

Quote

Frequent Posters

vamita

@vamita

Voyager

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: tinoo
I found maasaa's division of property formula quite odd = six equal parts.

The traditional way to do it is to divide the property between bhairon and basant equally in half.

Then bhairon can divide his into three - jagya, anandi and suguna

and basant can give his to one - nandu.

Here it is like bhairon's camp gets four cuts and basant's camp gets two cuts.

Ofcourse it is kalyani devi's property and she can do what she wishes. But I just found it odd to divide by six.

I think she is giving equal parts to all including her grand children and her children...Nandu, Basant, Bhairav, Anandi, Jagya, Sugna...That is the way even my grandmother did...! Children and grand children...Doesn't matter how many children each of her child had...!

Edited by vamita - 13 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Picasso9

@Picasso9

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

Tinoo,

You are right. Normally that's howit happens, however a person can divide his property any which way he deems fit, even omitting a beneficiary if they want, or giving it all or part to charity, so there is no fixed rule as such.

In this case I think it's fair in a sense because Basant will still inherit from his biological dad so he is the one who actually benefits more.

I also thinks it is very very progressive of Dadisa to include the daughter/s in the inheritance. In a patriarchal society, this is commendable.

Edited by parri814 - 13 years ago

Quote

Tuttifrutti

@Tuttifrutti

Voyager

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

I am not happy with division..if Anandi is getting the share, sugna too...then why not Sumitra and Gehna,...they should be treated respectfully...DS have two beendnees ..last one... DS should have a one share for herself...imagine if she is kicked by all others in future and where she will stay...may be with jaggu dada😭

I think Gauri should demand her share also...if original daughter in law is given a share then parellel daughter in law also desrves one...😆

Quote

supriya

@priyahana

Explorer

Posted: 13 years ago

Jagya might have so many mistress and gauri is one. And gauri is not a legally to related to the family. Yeah she has an eye on their property and to get it she's using jagya... Anandi is jagya's wife and so the daughter in law. But gauri is just a keep and so dont have any rights on the family's property

Quote

TVmonk

@TVmonk

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

Yes, even I felt Sumitra and Gehna should be given their individual share. That way the property gets divided into many more parts and Jagya's share becomes that much less. And as it is finally Sumitra and Bhairon will give their share to Anandi and Suguna, that way the property will be among the well-deserving.

If Gauri gets her independent share, she may kick out Jagya from her life. Maybe Dadisa knows this as well.😆

Quote

Tuttifrutti

@Tuttifrutti

Voyager

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

After all ..they demanded their share for a very noble cause..wants to open a hospital in Mubai..nothing wrong...

Finally...DS please give some land worth a house to Makhan ...

Quote

Blue Rose

@uniquebluerose

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: bhach
I am not happy with division..if Anandi is getting the share, sugna too...then why not Sumitra and Gehna,...they should be treated respectfully...DS have two beendnees ..last one... DS should have a one share for herself...imagine if she is kicked by all others in future and where she will stay...may be with jaggu dada😭

I think Gauri should demand her share also...if original daughter in law is given a share then parellel daughter in law also desrves one...😆

Well yes what you say makes sense esp with Sumitra and Gehan but then i guess its more because she is sure her sons Bhairon and Basanth won't kick their wives or mother out!!! and if you think like that even Varun and Shagun should come in the cound...as her sons son is getting so can the great grand daughter and great grand son!!!!

and of course I think there will be problem Jagya will say he and Nandu are pothas and so the whole property should be divided into only two and he should get a bigger share!!!

@ bold Gauri is the illegal partner if Jagya not parallel daughter in law...after the divorce if Jagya and Gauri marry then probably yes she can be called the daughter in law!!!!

Quote

Blue Rose

@uniquebluerose

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: bhach
After all ..they demanded their share for a very noble cause..wants to open a hospital in Mubai..nothing wrong...

Finally...DS please give some land worth a house to Makhan ...

oh so opening a hospital is noble cause well let me fight with my dad and in laws and get my share and open a hospital a posh and costly one and churn money out of it!!!

after all i am doing it for noble cause!!!

Quote

persistence

@persistence

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#10

I think anandi is getting property (not gehna & sumitra) because anandi has become daughter of the house (just like jagya, nandu, basant, bahariv)...so, she gets it.

Quote

1 2

Odd division of property

Related Topics

Explore Topics