No positivity? - Page 2

Well its not only case of child marriage but also infidelity. Jagya handled his second marriage in worst way and still demanding something for leaving a girl who is almost fed up with him and with his so called second wife.

Originally posted by: -ASTHA-

Well its not only case of child marriage but also infidelity. Jagya handled his second marriage in worst way and still demanding something for leaving a girl who is almost fed up with him and with his so called second wife.

I dont think positivity missing in serial as DS who was against second marriage of her daughter (sugna) now excited about second marriage of her DIL(anandi) Isnt it a positive change? DS who arranged second marriage of basant with gehna who is just few years elder than anandi dont want any old groom for anandi. Isnt it a positive change? And most important thing entire family standing with DIL instead of their only Ladla. Ist that a great change??

Negative thing I only find in this serial is anandi not filing case against illegal marriage.

These kind of things happens in society where first wife has to suffer on the name of child marriage, sacha pyar and many more reason.

Here with child marraige they r opposing infidelity. For child marraige anandi is suffering like hell and for infidelity they have to make life of gauri and jagya tough. So everything is in balance.

Maybe you are right in some way.

I agree with you Astha they they have shown many positives things! I agree with the topic maker that the message against child marriage would have been louder & clearer had they not insisting on J-G being as negative as they are right now. Why can't they just show J-A distancing emotionally, Gauri being a nice girl & the Singhs, not accepting Gauri actually, but neither disowning Jagya.

Jagya's fault is not that he fell out of love for Anandi & married Gauri. His fault is the way the whole situation is being handled.

Just my opinion. Having said that, it is equally true that the producers & directors if BV have really brought many things to light which were not earlier known...& their contribution to the societal relaisation at large is commendable👏

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

They could have made this show meaningful as well. Anandi could have studied medicine and taking care of the hospital. In medical college itself, she could have met some suitable guy. While Jagya nd Gauri carried on with their lives.

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

True! Can't believe anyone says "more interested in disco than own husband" I mean is a wife a slave or something that she can't even go out one night without husband? We've seen her taking heaps of care of Jogia before all through marriage and even morning after. A wife should not be expected to be around 24/7 only because that is not expected of men! This is just role reversal!

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

Why cant they make Jagya to have a good job , earn well and generally have a happy life with or without Gauri? Why to make him unsuccessful all the time? Do they want to show that Jagya has failed in his duties as a husband to anandi and thus should be punished endlessly?

On the one hand they say that child marriages are bad. On the otherhand they say that Jagya should be with anandi only and he will be destroyed if he does not. They are showing that Jagya is being punished, humiliated and turning into complete negative character for making his child marriage a failure.

If the cvs want to show child marriages do not work out sometimes, then they should show Jagya and Gauri in somewhat positive light. By making the case only for anandi, they are just showing that child marriages can be successful if the parties dont abandon each other. They are infact supporting child mariiage of Jagya and anandi.

We all have love and sympathy for anandi and they should not think giving happiness to anandi is equal to giving unhappiness to Jagya. It becomes self contradictory.

wanna see anadi with new guy...cant see her back side