Posted:
Why cant they make Jagya to have a good job , earn well and generally have a happy life with or without Gauri? Why to make him unsuccessful all the time? Do they want to show that Jagya has failed in his duties as a husband to anandi and thus should be punished endlessly?
On the one hand they say that child marriages are bad. On the otherhand they say that Jagya should be with anandi only and he will be destroyed if he does not. They are showing that Jagya is being punished, humiliated and turning into complete negative character for making his child marriage a failure.
If the cvs want to show child marriages do not work out sometimes, then they should show Jagya and Gauri in somewhat positive light. By making the case only for anandi, they are just showing that child marriages can be successful if the parties dont abandon each other. They are infact supporting child mariiage of Jagya and anandi.
We all have love and sympathy for anandi and they should not think giving happiness to anandi is equal to giving unhappiness to Jagya. It becomes self contradictory.
On the one hand they say that child marriages are bad. On the otherhand they say that Jagya should be with anandi only and he will be destroyed if he does not. They are showing that Jagya is being punished, humiliated and turning into complete negative character for making his child marriage a failure.
If the cvs want to show child marriages do not work out sometimes, then they should show Jagya and Gauri in somewhat positive light. By making the case only for anandi, they are just showing that child marriages can be successful if the parties dont abandon each other. They are infact supporting child mariiage of Jagya and anandi.
We all have love and sympathy for anandi and they should not think giving happiness to anandi is equal to giving unhappiness to Jagya. It becomes self contradictory.
Geet - Hui Sabse Parayee
Seher Hone Ko Hai
