First hearing:
They showed Kunal at his rhetorical bestđ.Well to be honest they did start the case of well, Kunal presented a good defense that did leave Thakral speechlessđ.But Kunal to ensure that no 'mai ka laal' would screw you up in court could you not have atleast gone to the engagement venue , collected proofs to support your case.Brought the manager as witness and have him testify that no windows panes were shattered, no plates were broken.But no he did nothing.đ
Second hearing:
See if you had bothered to go and collect information from the venue you would have come to know about Siddhi being there instead having Thakral tell you that.And Siddhi you should have spoken to Kunal about this and Ritcha knowing about your divorce case.Well on the witness stand as a lawyer you were a pathetic and as a wife all I can say was too much of tearsđĄ,but the I excused you then and will now too.It still hasn't got unbearable.
Third case hearing:
Seriously Siddhi who would have trusted Thakral with the contractđĄ? The thakrals themselves dont trust each other then why would youđ?
Fourth Case hearing:
A slight reprise , you lost your main witness but still managed to get your act straight and also almiost managed to extract a confession from Ritcha.Thakral and his actingđĄ but I enjoyed it.đ
Fifth hearing:
Ok Thakral did play a dirty clever game, but what about thinking on your feetđĄ? Why did you not cross examine the witness , grill him thoroughly.Why did you not try implicate Thakral , you may not have proved him wrong atleast you could have had the judge not make up his mind.Thankfully for you , the judge knew you so on your plea he withheld his judgement for another date.
Things went down hill from now on.Lets trace that historic journey.
The CCTV miracle finally dawns on the Chopra duo, its even more ridiculous because when Kunal fought Neha's case his winning evidence was a CCTV footage yet he never thought of it till nowđ?
They get the CD , still they make no copy depite knowing that the Thakral's will stop at nothing to destroy evidence.đĄ
Siddhi madam succesfully got herself kidnapped, and the CD miraculously is still at home despite having to be authenticated at a forensic labđ.And Kunal the majnu is ready to give up the CD in exchange for his beloved's life!! Taaliya Taaliya...đđđ
Then came the cat and mouse chase and the shooting.So now they lost the CD.And they gave up hope on the case too.They decided to sit cry and console each other and wait for a miracleđđ.What they could have done, well to list a few:
Gone back to the hotel in vain hope that maybe they still have a copy, if they did they would have known that Rohit came by to get the hard disk earsed.Used the security team memeber as a witness , he could have claimed there was indeed a CD and also state what he saw in it.And in addition tell about Rohit and his demand.
Gone back to the forensic lab , procured a duplicate of the authentication report, this would have proved the existence of the CD in question.
Submitted the FIR Kunal filed when Siddhi went missing, submitted the statement issued to the hospital by Siddhi at the hospital.The inpector should have been bought to court , he could have talked about the arrest and simultaneous escape Rohit.Above all the inspector could have submitted the taped phone conversation between the kidnappers and Rohit.This would have directly linked the Thakrals to the crime.đ
The police had reached the site of shootout , they would have collected forensic evidence from there.This could have been submitted.
They could have tried to get the receptionist from the Gujrat hotel to testify that 4 people came searching for SINAL.
What's pathetic is that , we daily see people who have committed crime openly infront of hundreds of witnesses still sometimes manage to get acquitted becuase of good lawyering skills , I am not saying this is right , but when truth is on your side why not apply your brains a bit and win.